From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com, tony@atomide.com,
kishon@ti.com, nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] memory: omap-gpmc: check for nand node name instead of just compatibility
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:03:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YboRyR+SqBV03cY0@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208124611.16843-3-rogerq@kernel.org>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> We have added new compatibles for controller so just checking for
> "ti,omap2-nand" compatible is not enough. Check for "nand" node name
> as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index 624153048182..9f0062a262db 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -2183,7 +2183,8 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
> }
> }
>
> - if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand") ||
> + of_node_name_eq(child, "nand")) {
It would be better to stick with compatible strings. You can match
against a match table. This should be 'nand-controller' really if this
binding had a proper split between the controller and nand chips.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
Cc: krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com, tony@atomide.com,
kishon@ti.com, nm@ti.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] memory: omap-gpmc: check for nand node name instead of just compatibility
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 10:03:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YboRyR+SqBV03cY0@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211208124611.16843-3-rogerq@kernel.org>
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> We have added new compatibles for controller so just checking for
> "ti,omap2-nand" compatible is not enough. Check for "nand" node name
> as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> index 624153048182..9f0062a262db 100644
> --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c
> @@ -2183,7 +2183,8 @@ static int gpmc_probe_generic_child(struct platform_device *pdev,
> }
> }
>
> - if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand")) {
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(child, "ti,omap2-nand") ||
> + of_node_name_eq(child, "nand")) {
It would be better to stick with compatible strings. You can match
against a match table. This should be 'nand-controller' really if this
binding had a proper split between the controller and nand chips.
Rob
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-15 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-08 12:46 [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Add compatible for AM64 Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti, gpmc: " Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] memory: omap-gpmc: Add support for GPMC on AM64 SoC Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] memory: omap-gpmc: check for nand node name instead of just compatibility Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` Roger Quadros
2021-12-15 16:03 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-12-15 16:03 ` Rob Herring
2021-12-17 7:35 ` Roger Quadros
2021-12-17 7:35 ` Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: arch_k3: Select GPMC device driver Roger Quadros
2021-12-08 12:46 ` Roger Quadros
2021-12-15 16:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: memory-controllers: ti,gpmc: Add compatible for AM64 Rob Herring
2021-12-15 16:03 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YboRyR+SqBV03cY0@robh.at.kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rogerq@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.