* Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon?
@ 2021-12-22 9:54 Lukas Bulwahn
2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Bulwahn @ 2021-12-22 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vaibhav Hiremath, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman,
greybus-dev
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-staging
Dear Vaibhav, dear Johan, dear Alex, dear Greg,
I have seen that the greybus arche driver has been under heavy
development in 2016 and 2017 with some further clean-up in 2019.
However, so far, the config GREYBUS_ARCHE for this driver still
depends on the out-of-tree config USB_HSIC_USB3613, with a proper
exception made for compile testing (with COMPILE_TEST).
Will this USB_HSIC_USB3613 config and driver still be added in the
mainline kernel in the near future, so that the config dependencies
are consistent in mainline?
Or, are the further out-of-tree additions still maintained for the
current kernel and will stay out of tree? Is this arche driver not
needed anymore and can be dropped?
Best regards,
Lukas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon?
2021-12-22 9:54 Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? Lukas Bulwahn
@ 2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-22 10:10 ` Lukas Bulwahn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-12-22 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lukas Bulwahn
Cc: Vaibhav Hiremath, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, greybus-dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-staging
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:54:41AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> Dear Vaibhav, dear Johan, dear Alex, dear Greg,
>
> I have seen that the greybus arche driver has been under heavy
> development in 2016 and 2017 with some further clean-up in 2019.
>
> However, so far, the config GREYBUS_ARCHE for this driver still
> depends on the out-of-tree config USB_HSIC_USB3613, with a proper
> exception made for compile testing (with COMPILE_TEST).
>
> Will this USB_HSIC_USB3613 config and driver still be added in the
> mainline kernel in the near future, so that the config dependencies
> are consistent in mainline?
Do you have this hardware? If so, we can add the driver, but given that
I did not think the chip ever actually shipped, it didn't make much
sense.
> Or, are the further out-of-tree additions still maintained for the
> current kernel and will stay out of tree? Is this arche driver not
> needed anymore and can be dropped?
Do you want to drop it as it is causing problems for you? It's a good
example driver for those wanting to create a greybus host controller
driver so it's nice to have in the tree, unless you have a different one
that should be merged instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon?
2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2021-12-22 10:10 ` Lukas Bulwahn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Bulwahn @ 2021-12-22 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: Vaibhav Hiremath, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, greybus-dev,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-staging
On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:58 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:54:41AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > Dear Vaibhav, dear Johan, dear Alex, dear Greg,
> >
> > I have seen that the greybus arche driver has been under heavy
> > development in 2016 and 2017 with some further clean-up in 2019.
> >
> > However, so far, the config GREYBUS_ARCHE for this driver still
> > depends on the out-of-tree config USB_HSIC_USB3613, with a proper
> > exception made for compile testing (with COMPILE_TEST).
> >
> > Will this USB_HSIC_USB3613 config and driver still be added in the
> > mainline kernel in the near future, so that the config dependencies
> > are consistent in mainline?
>
> Do you have this hardware? If so, we can add the driver, but given that
> I did not think the chip ever actually shipped, it didn't make much
> sense.
>
> > Or, are the further out-of-tree additions still maintained for the
> > current kernel and will stay out of tree? Is this arche driver not
> > needed anymore and can be dropped?
>
> Do you want to drop it as it is causing problems for you? It's a good
> example driver for those wanting to create a greybus host controller
> driver so it's nice to have in the tree, unless you have a different one
> that should be merged instead?
>
Greg, I just stumbled over this code due to some janitorial workwith
./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py in the kernel repository and wondered
if it is worth keeping this in the kernel tree. I do not have the
hardware, nor do I need it and the driver code to it.
Of course, the repository is full of other dead code*... so, if you
know the current state of this driver, it just remains in staging, and
is actually a good example for educational purposes, we are all fine
:)
*... This is not a complaint, but my task description for me as kernel
janitor to submit clean-up patches for the various places of the dead
code.
Thanks for your quick response,
Lukas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-22 10:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-12-22 9:54 Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? Lukas Bulwahn
2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-12-22 10:10 ` Lukas Bulwahn
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.