* Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? @ 2021-12-22 9:54 Lukas Bulwahn 2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Lukas Bulwahn @ 2021-12-22 9:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Vaibhav Hiremath, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, Greg Kroah-Hartman, greybus-dev Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-staging Dear Vaibhav, dear Johan, dear Alex, dear Greg, I have seen that the greybus arche driver has been under heavy development in 2016 and 2017 with some further clean-up in 2019. However, so far, the config GREYBUS_ARCHE for this driver still depends on the out-of-tree config USB_HSIC_USB3613, with a proper exception made for compile testing (with COMPILE_TEST). Will this USB_HSIC_USB3613 config and driver still be added in the mainline kernel in the near future, so that the config dependencies are consistent in mainline? Or, are the further out-of-tree additions still maintained for the current kernel and will stay out of tree? Is this arche driver not needed anymore and can be dropped? Best regards, Lukas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? 2021-12-22 9:54 Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? Lukas Bulwahn @ 2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2021-12-22 10:10 ` Lukas Bulwahn 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-12-22 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lukas Bulwahn Cc: Vaibhav Hiremath, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, greybus-dev, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-staging On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:54:41AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > Dear Vaibhav, dear Johan, dear Alex, dear Greg, > > I have seen that the greybus arche driver has been under heavy > development in 2016 and 2017 with some further clean-up in 2019. > > However, so far, the config GREYBUS_ARCHE for this driver still > depends on the out-of-tree config USB_HSIC_USB3613, with a proper > exception made for compile testing (with COMPILE_TEST). > > Will this USB_HSIC_USB3613 config and driver still be added in the > mainline kernel in the near future, so that the config dependencies > are consistent in mainline? Do you have this hardware? If so, we can add the driver, but given that I did not think the chip ever actually shipped, it didn't make much sense. > Or, are the further out-of-tree additions still maintained for the > current kernel and will stay out of tree? Is this arche driver not > needed anymore and can be dropped? Do you want to drop it as it is causing problems for you? It's a good example driver for those wanting to create a greybus host controller driver so it's nice to have in the tree, unless you have a different one that should be merged instead? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? 2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2021-12-22 10:10 ` Lukas Bulwahn 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Lukas Bulwahn @ 2021-12-22 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Vaibhav Hiremath, Johan Hovold, Alex Elder, greybus-dev, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-staging On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:58 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2021 at 10:54:41AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote: > > Dear Vaibhav, dear Johan, dear Alex, dear Greg, > > > > I have seen that the greybus arche driver has been under heavy > > development in 2016 and 2017 with some further clean-up in 2019. > > > > However, so far, the config GREYBUS_ARCHE for this driver still > > depends on the out-of-tree config USB_HSIC_USB3613, with a proper > > exception made for compile testing (with COMPILE_TEST). > > > > Will this USB_HSIC_USB3613 config and driver still be added in the > > mainline kernel in the near future, so that the config dependencies > > are consistent in mainline? > > Do you have this hardware? If so, we can add the driver, but given that > I did not think the chip ever actually shipped, it didn't make much > sense. > > > Or, are the further out-of-tree additions still maintained for the > > current kernel and will stay out of tree? Is this arche driver not > > needed anymore and can be dropped? > > Do you want to drop it as it is causing problems for you? It's a good > example driver for those wanting to create a greybus host controller > driver so it's nice to have in the tree, unless you have a different one > that should be merged instead? > Greg, I just stumbled over this code due to some janitorial workwith ./scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py in the kernel repository and wondered if it is worth keeping this in the kernel tree. I do not have the hardware, nor do I need it and the driver code to it. Of course, the repository is full of other dead code*... so, if you know the current state of this driver, it just remains in staging, and is actually a good example for educational purposes, we are all fine :) *... This is not a complaint, but my task description for me as kernel janitor to submit clean-up patches for the various places of the dead code. Thanks for your quick response, Lukas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-22 10:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-12-22 9:54 Addition of config USB_HSIC_USB3613 soon? Lukas Bulwahn 2021-12-22 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2021-12-22 10:10 ` Lukas Bulwahn
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.