All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alex.popov@linux.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] arm64: entry: use stackleak_erase_on_task_stack()
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 17:42:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnKs2E2t+coe2h3w@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427173128.2603085-14-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:31:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On arm64 we always call stackleak_erase() on a task stack, and never
> call it on another stack. We can avoid some redundant work by using
> stackleak_erase_on_task_stack(), telling the stackleak code that it's
> being called on a task stack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	alex.popov@linux.com, keescook@chromium.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/13] arm64: entry: use stackleak_erase_on_task_stack()
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 17:42:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YnKs2E2t+coe2h3w@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220427173128.2603085-14-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 06:31:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On arm64 we always call stackleak_erase() on a task stack, and never
> call it on another stack. We can avoid some redundant work by using
> stackleak_erase_on_task_stack(), telling the stackleak code that it's
> being called on a task stack.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Alexander Popov <alex.popov@linux.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-04 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-27 17:31 [PATCH v2 00/13] stackleak: fixes and rework Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] arm64: stackleak: fix current_top_of_stack() Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-04 16:41   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 16:41     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:01     ` Kees Cook
2022-05-04 19:01       ` Kees Cook
2022-05-04 19:55       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:55         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-05  8:25         ` Will Deacon
2022-05-05  8:25           ` Will Deacon
2022-05-08 17:24   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-08 17:24     ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-10 11:36     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-10 11:36       ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] stackleak: move skip_erasing() check earlier Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-08 17:44   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-08 17:44     ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-10 11:40     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-10 11:40       ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] stackleak: remove redundant check Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-08 18:17   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-08 18:17     ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-10 11:46     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-10 11:46       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-11  3:00       ` Kees Cook
2022-05-11  3:00         ` Kees Cook
2022-05-11  8:02         ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-11  8:02           ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-11 14:44           ` Kees Cook
2022-05-11 14:44             ` Kees Cook
2022-05-12  9:14             ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-12  9:14               ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-15 16:17               ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-15 16:17                 ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-24 10:03                 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-24 10:03                   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 22:09                   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-26 22:09                     ` Alexander Popov
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] stackleak: rework stack low bound handling Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] stackleak: clarify variable names Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-08 20:49   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-08 20:49     ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-10 13:01     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-10 13:01       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-11  3:05       ` Kees Cook
2022-05-11  3:05         ` Kees Cook
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] stackleak: rework stack high bound handling Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-08 21:27   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-08 21:27     ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-10 11:22     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-10 11:22       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-15 16:32       ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-15 16:32         ` Alexander Popov
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] stackleak: rework poison scanning Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-09 13:51   ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-09 13:51     ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-10 13:13     ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-10 13:13       ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-15 17:33       ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-15 17:33         ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-24 13:31         ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-24 13:31           ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-26 23:25           ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-26 23:25             ` Alexander Popov
2022-05-31 18:13             ` Kees Cook
2022-05-31 18:13               ` Kees Cook
2022-06-03 16:55               ` Alexander Popov
2022-06-03 16:55                 ` Alexander Popov
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] lkdtm/stackleak: avoid spurious failure Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] lkdtm/stackleak: rework boundary management Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-04 19:07   ` Kees Cook
2022-05-04 19:07     ` Kees Cook
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] lkdtm/stackleak: prevent unexpected stack usage Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] lkdtm/stackleak: check stack boundaries Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] stackleak: add on/off stack variants Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] arm64: entry: use stackleak_erase_on_task_stack() Mark Rutland
2022-04-27 17:31   ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-04 16:42   ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2022-05-04 16:42     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-05-04 19:16 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] stackleak: fixes and rework Kees Cook
2022-05-04 19:16   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YnKs2E2t+coe2h3w@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.popov@linux.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.