From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: elver@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] asm-generic: Add memory barrier dma_mb()
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YotyNJeTxQMk/eat@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523113126.171714-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:31:25PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The memory barrier dma_mb() is introduced by commit a76a37777f2c
> ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ensure queue is read after updating prod pointer"),
> which is used to ensure that prior (both reads and writes) accesses
> to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent MMIO write.
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> # for asm-generic
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
FWIW, this looks sane to me so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
I'll leave the final say to Will, as I assume this'll go via the arm64 tree and
he'll be the one picking this.
Mark.
> ---
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 11 ++++++-----
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> index b12df9137e1c..832b5d36e279 100644
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -1894,6 +1894,7 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
>
> (*) dma_wmb();
> (*) dma_rmb();
> + (*) dma_mb();
>
> These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
> of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
> @@ -1925,11 +1926,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
> The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership
> before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
> us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
> - can see it now has ownership. Note that, when using writel(), a prior
> - wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes
> - have completed before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper
> - writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used
> - here.
> + can see it now has ownership. The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and
> + a dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed
> + to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before
> + writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide
> + this guarantee and must not be used here.
>
> See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on
> relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst file for
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index fd7e8fbaeef1..961f4d88f9ef 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
> #define wmb() do { kcsan_wmb(); __wmb(); } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef __dma_mb
> +#define dma_mb() do { kcsan_mb(); __dma_mb(); } while (0)
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef __dma_rmb
> #define dma_rmb() do { kcsan_rmb(); __dma_rmb(); } while (0)
> #endif
> @@ -65,6 +69,10 @@
> #define wmb() mb()
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef dma_mb
> +#define dma_mb() mb()
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef dma_rmb
> #define dma_rmb() rmb()
> #endif
> --
> 2.35.3
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: elver@google.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] asm-generic: Add memory barrier dma_mb()
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 12:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YotyNJeTxQMk/eat@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523113126.171714-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:31:25PM +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> The memory barrier dma_mb() is introduced by commit a76a37777f2c
> ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Ensure queue is read after updating prod pointer"),
> which is used to ensure that prior (both reads and writes) accesses
> to memory by a CPU are ordered w.r.t. a subsequent MMIO write.
>
> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> # for asm-generic
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
FWIW, this looks sane to me so:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
I'll leave the final say to Will, as I assume this'll go via the arm64 tree and
he'll be the one picking this.
Mark.
> ---
> Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 11 ++++++-----
> include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 8 ++++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> index b12df9137e1c..832b5d36e279 100644
> --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
> @@ -1894,6 +1894,7 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
>
> (*) dma_wmb();
> (*) dma_rmb();
> + (*) dma_mb();
>
> These are for use with consistent memory to guarantee the ordering
> of writes or reads of shared memory accessible to both the CPU and a
> @@ -1925,11 +1926,11 @@ There are some more advanced barrier functions:
> The dma_rmb() allows us guarantee the device has released ownership
> before we read the data from the descriptor, and the dma_wmb() allows
> us to guarantee the data is written to the descriptor before the device
> - can see it now has ownership. Note that, when using writel(), a prior
> - wmb() is not needed to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes
> - have completed before writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper
> - writel_relaxed() does not provide this guarantee and must not be used
> - here.
> + can see it now has ownership. The dma_mb() implies both a dma_rmb() and
> + a dma_wmb(). Note that, when using writel(), a prior wmb() is not needed
> + to guarantee that the cache coherent memory writes have completed before
> + writing to the MMIO region. The cheaper writel_relaxed() does not provide
> + this guarantee and must not be used here.
>
> See the subsection "Kernel I/O barrier effects" for more information on
> relaxed I/O accessors and the Documentation/core-api/dma-api.rst file for
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> index fd7e8fbaeef1..961f4d88f9ef 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@
> #define wmb() do { kcsan_wmb(); __wmb(); } while (0)
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef __dma_mb
> +#define dma_mb() do { kcsan_mb(); __dma_mb(); } while (0)
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef __dma_rmb
> #define dma_rmb() do { kcsan_rmb(); __dma_rmb(); } while (0)
> #endif
> @@ -65,6 +69,10 @@
> #define wmb() mb()
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef dma_mb
> +#define dma_mb() mb()
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef dma_rmb
> #define dma_rmb() rmb()
> #endif
> --
> 2.35.3
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-23 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-23 11:31 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Fix kcsan test_barrier fail and panic Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:31 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] asm-generic: Add memory barrier dma_mb() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:31 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:35 ` Marco Elver
2022-05-23 11:35 ` Marco Elver
2022-06-16 23:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16 23:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-17 10:18 ` Marco Elver
2022-06-17 10:18 ` Marco Elver
2022-06-19 9:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-19 9:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-20 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-20 21:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-05-23 11:38 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-05-23 11:38 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-23 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: kcsan: Support detecting more missing memory barriers Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:31 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2022-05-23 14:16 ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-14 3:20 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-06-14 3:20 ` Kefeng Wang
2022-06-21 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-21 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-06-23 19:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: Fix kcsan test_barrier fail and panic Will Deacon
2022-06-23 19:31 ` Will Deacon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-05-23 11:26 Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] asm-generic: Add memory barrier dma_mb() Kefeng Wang
2022-05-23 11:26 ` Kefeng Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YotyNJeTxQMk/eat@FVFF77S0Q05N \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.