From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Add missing vfio_unregister_group_dev() call
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:35:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz69amRXgm5ZTKrg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005141717.234c215e.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:17:17PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > index 41bba40feef8f4..9003145adb5a93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > @@ -1615,6 +1615,7 @@ static void intel_vgpu_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vgpu->attached))
> > return;
> >
> > + vfio_unregister_group_dev(&vgpu->vfio_device);
> > vfio_put_device(&vgpu->vfio_device);
> > }
> >
> >
> > base-commit: c72e0034e6d4c36322d958b997d11d2627c6056c
>
> This is marked for stable, but I think the stable backport for
> existing kernels is actually:
Yes probably, this patch won't apply so if anyone wants to see it in
the stable series they need to follow the process to send the reworked
version.
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Add missing vfio_unregister_group_dev() call
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:35:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz69amRXgm5ZTKrg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005141717.234c215e.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:17:17PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > index 41bba40feef8f4..9003145adb5a93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > @@ -1615,6 +1615,7 @@ static void intel_vgpu_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vgpu->attached))
> > return;
> >
> > + vfio_unregister_group_dev(&vgpu->vfio_device);
> > vfio_put_device(&vgpu->vfio_device);
> > }
> >
> >
> > base-commit: c72e0034e6d4c36322d958b997d11d2627c6056c
>
> This is marked for stable, but I think the stable backport for
> existing kernels is actually:
Yes probably, this patch won't apply so if anyone wants to see it in
the stable series they need to follow the process to send the reworked
version.
Jason
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Add missing vfio_unregister_group_dev() call
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 08:35:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yz69amRXgm5ZTKrg@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221005141717.234c215e.alex.williamson@redhat.com>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 02:17:17PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > index 41bba40feef8f4..9003145adb5a93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> > @@ -1615,6 +1615,7 @@ static void intel_vgpu_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(vgpu->attached))
> > return;
> >
> > + vfio_unregister_group_dev(&vgpu->vfio_device);
> > vfio_put_device(&vgpu->vfio_device);
> > }
> >
> >
> > base-commit: c72e0034e6d4c36322d958b997d11d2627c6056c
>
> This is marked for stable, but I think the stable backport for
> existing kernels is actually:
Yes probably, this patch won't apply so if anyone wants to see it in
the stable series they need to follow the process to send the reworked
version.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-06 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-29 17:48 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt: Add missing vfio_unregister_group_dev() call Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-29 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-29 17:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-09-29 20:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2022-09-30 1:47 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] " Tian, Kevin
2022-09-30 1:47 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-09-30 1:47 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-09-30 6:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-30 6:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-09-30 21:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-09-30 21:31 ` Alex Williamson
2022-09-30 21:31 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-05 20:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-05 20:17 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-05 20:17 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-05 22:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-05 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-05 22:03 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-06 11:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-06 11:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-06 11:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-06 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Williamson
2022-10-06 18:31 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-06 18:31 ` Alex Williamson
2022-10-10 23:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-10-10 23:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-10 23:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-19 9:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Wang, Zhi A
2022-10-19 9:40 ` Wang, Zhi A
2022-10-19 9:40 ` Wang, Zhi A
2022-10-19 10:13 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tian, Kevin
2022-10-19 10:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-19 10:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-10-06 11:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-10-06 11:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-06 11:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-10-05 21:16 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gvt: Add missing vfio_unregister_group_dev() call (rev2) Patchwork
2022-10-05 21:38 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yz69amRXgm5ZTKrg@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.