All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@kapio-technology.com
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	kuba@kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:59:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzPwwuCe0HkJpkQe@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a4549d645f9bbbf41e814f087eb07d1@kapio-technology.com>

Sorry for the delay, was away.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:33:10AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote:
> On 2022-09-21 09:15, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > 	bridge fdb add `mac_get $h2` dev br0 blackhole
> 
> To make this work, I think we need to change the concept, so that blackhole
> FDB entries are added to ports connected to the bridge, thus
>      bridge fdb add MAC dev $swpX master blackhole
> 
> This makes sense as the driver adds them based on the port where the SMAC is
> seen, even though the effect of the blackhole FDB entry is switch wide.

Asking user space to associate a blackhole entry with a bridge port does
not make sense to me because unlike regular entries, blackhole entries
do not forward packets out of this port. Blackhole routes and nexthops
are not associated with a device either.

> Adding them to the bridge (e.g. f.ex. br0) will not work in the SW bridge as
> the entries then are not found.

Why not found? This works:

 # bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 self local
 $ bridge fdb get 00:11:22:33:44:55 br br0
 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 master br0 permanent

With blackhole support I expect:

 # bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 self local blackhole
 $ bridge fdb get 00:11:22:33:44:55 br br0
 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 master br0 permanent blackhole

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@kapio-technology.com
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:59:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzPwwuCe0HkJpkQe@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a4549d645f9bbbf41e814f087eb07d1@kapio-technology.com>

Sorry for the delay, was away.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:33:10AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote:
> On 2022-09-21 09:15, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > 	bridge fdb add `mac_get $h2` dev br0 blackhole
> 
> To make this work, I think we need to change the concept, so that blackhole
> FDB entries are added to ports connected to the bridge, thus
>      bridge fdb add MAC dev $swpX master blackhole
> 
> This makes sense as the driver adds them based on the port where the SMAC is
> seen, even though the effect of the blackhole FDB entry is switch wide.

Asking user space to associate a blackhole entry with a bridge port does
not make sense to me because unlike regular entries, blackhole entries
do not forward packets out of this port. Blackhole routes and nexthops
are not associated with a device either.

> Adding them to the bridge (e.g. f.ex. br0) will not work in the SW bridge as
> the entries then are not found.

Why not found? This works:

 # bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 self local
 $ bridge fdb get 00:11:22:33:44:55 br br0
 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 master br0 permanent

With blackhole support I expect:

 # bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 self local blackhole
 $ bridge fdb get 00:11:22:33:44:55 br br0
 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 master br0 permanent blackhole

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@kapio-technology.com
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Yuwei Wang <wangyuweihx@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 09:59:14 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzPwwuCe0HkJpkQe@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a4549d645f9bbbf41e814f087eb07d1@kapio-technology.com>

Sorry for the delay, was away.

On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 10:33:10AM +0200, netdev@kapio-technology.com wrote:
> On 2022-09-21 09:15, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > 	bridge fdb add `mac_get $h2` dev br0 blackhole
> 
> To make this work, I think we need to change the concept, so that blackhole
> FDB entries are added to ports connected to the bridge, thus
>      bridge fdb add MAC dev $swpX master blackhole
> 
> This makes sense as the driver adds them based on the port where the SMAC is
> seen, even though the effect of the blackhole FDB entry is switch wide.

Asking user space to associate a blackhole entry with a bridge port does
not make sense to me because unlike regular entries, blackhole entries
do not forward packets out of this port. Blackhole routes and nexthops
are not associated with a device either.

> Adding them to the bridge (e.g. f.ex. br0) will not work in the SW bridge as
> the entries then are not found.

Why not found? This works:

 # bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 self local
 $ bridge fdb get 00:11:22:33:44:55 br br0
 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 master br0 permanent

With blackhole support I expect:

 # bridge fdb add 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 self local blackhole
 $ bridge fdb get 00:11:22:33:44:55 br br0
 00:11:22:33:44:55 dev br0 master br0 permanent blackhole

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-28  6:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 207+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26 11:45 [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 0/6] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB) Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45 ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45 ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45 ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag to extend locked port feature Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-27 11:30   ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 11:30     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 11:30     ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 13:17     ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 13:17       ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 13:17       ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 13:54       ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 13:54         ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 13:54         ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-28 11:24       ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-28 11:24         ` netdev
2022-08-28 11:24         ` netdev
2022-08-28 11:21     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-28 11:21       ` netdev
2022-08-28 11:21       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:09     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 11:09       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:09       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:43     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 11:43       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:43       ` netdev
2022-08-29 14:02     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 14:02       ` netdev
2022-08-29 14:02       ` netdev
2022-08-29 16:12       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 16:12         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 16:12         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 16:26         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 16:26           ` netdev
2022-08-29 16:26           ` netdev
2022-08-30 14:19         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-30 14:19           ` netdev
2022-08-30 14:19           ` netdev
2022-09-03 14:27           ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-03 14:27             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-03 14:27             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 15:19   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 15:19     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 15:19     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-28 10:23     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-28 10:23       ` netdev
2022-08-28 10:23       ` netdev
2022-08-29  7:52       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29  7:52         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29  7:52         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29  8:04         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29  8:04           ` netdev
2022-08-29  8:04           ` netdev
2022-08-29  9:51         ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-29  9:51           ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-29  9:51           ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-29  9:32     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29  9:32       ` netdev
2022-08-29  9:32       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:01     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 11:01       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:01       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:34     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 11:34       ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:34       ` netdev
2022-08-26 11:45 ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 2/6] net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-27 15:46   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 15:46     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 15:46     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 15:52     ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 15:52       ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-27 15:52       ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-08-28 11:27     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-28 11:27       ` netdev
2022-08-28 11:27       ` netdev
2022-08-27 18:34   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 18:34     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 18:34     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-26 11:45 ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 3/6] drivers: net: dsa: add locked fdb entry flag to drivers Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45 ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 4/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: allow reading FID when handling ATU violations Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45 ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 5/6] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: MacAuth/MAB implementation Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45 ` [Bridge] [PATCH v5 net-next 6/6] selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-26 11:45   ` Hans Schultz
2022-08-27 18:21   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 18:21     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-27 18:21     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-28 12:00     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-28 12:00       ` netdev
2022-08-28 12:00       ` netdev
2022-08-29  7:40       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29  7:40         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29  7:40         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29  8:01         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29  8:01           ` netdev
2022-08-29  8:01           ` netdev
2022-08-29 11:32           ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 11:32             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 11:32             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 12:04             ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 12:04               ` netdev
2022-08-29 12:04               ` netdev
2022-08-29 14:37               ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 14:37                 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 14:37                 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 15:08                 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 15:08                   ` netdev
2022-08-29 15:08                   ` netdev
2022-08-29 16:03                   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 16:03                     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 16:03                     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-08-29 16:13                     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 16:13                       ` netdev
2022-08-29 16:13                       ` netdev
2022-09-03 14:47                       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-03 14:47                         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-03 14:47                         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-07 21:10                         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-07 21:10                           ` netdev
2022-09-07 21:10                           ` netdev
2022-09-08  7:59                           ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-08  7:59                             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-08  7:59                             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-08 11:14                             ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-08 11:14                               ` netdev
2022-09-08 11:14                               ` netdev
2022-09-08 11:20                               ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-09-08 11:20                                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-09-08 11:20                                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-09-09 13:11                                 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-09 13:11                                   ` netdev
2022-09-09 13:11                                   ` netdev
2022-09-11  0:13                                   ` [Bridge] " Vladimir Oltean
2022-09-11  0:13                                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-09-11  0:13                                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-09-11  9:23                                     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-11  9:23                                       ` netdev
2022-09-11  9:23                                       ` netdev
2022-09-12  9:08                                       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-12  9:08                                         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-12  9:08                                         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-20 21:29                                         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-20 21:29                                           ` netdev
2022-09-20 21:29                                           ` netdev
2022-09-21  7:15                                           ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-21  7:15                                             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-21  7:15                                             ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-22 20:35                                             ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-22 20:35                                               ` netdev
2022-09-22 20:35                                               ` netdev
2022-09-27 15:19                                               ` [Bridge] " Petr Machata
2022-09-27 15:19                                                 ` Petr Machata
2022-09-27 15:19                                                 ` Petr Machata
2022-09-23 11:34                                             ` netdev
2022-09-23 11:34                                               ` netdev
2022-09-23 11:34                                               ` netdev
2022-09-23 12:21                                               ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-23 12:21                                                 ` netdev
2022-09-23 12:21                                                 ` netdev
2022-09-23 12:01                                             ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-23 12:01                                               ` netdev
2022-09-23 12:01                                               ` netdev
2022-09-27  8:33                                             ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-27  8:33                                               ` netdev
2022-09-27  8:33                                               ` netdev
2022-09-28  6:59                                               ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-09-28  6:59                                                 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-28  6:59                                                 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-28  7:29                                                 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-28  7:29                                                   ` netdev
2022-09-28  7:29                                                   ` netdev
2022-09-28  7:47                                                 ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-28  7:47                                                   ` netdev
2022-09-28  7:47                                                   ` netdev
2022-09-28  8:46                                                   ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-28  8:46                                                     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-28  8:46                                                     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-28 10:16                                                     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-28 10:16                                                       ` netdev
2022-09-28 10:16                                                       ` netdev
2022-09-28 10:19                                                     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-28 10:19                                                       ` netdev
2022-09-28 10:19                                                       ` netdev
2022-09-29 22:26                                                     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-29 22:26                                                       ` netdev
2022-09-29 22:26                                                       ` netdev
2022-09-21 19:53                                         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-09-21 19:53                                           ` netdev
2022-09-21 19:53                                           ` netdev
2022-08-29  8:55         ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29  8:55           ` netdev
2022-08-29  8:55           ` netdev
2022-08-29 16:07     ` [Bridge] " netdev
2022-08-29 16:07       ` netdev
2022-08-29 16:07       ` netdev
2022-09-03 14:49       ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2022-09-03 14:49         ` Ido Schimmel
2022-09-03 14:49         ` Ido Schimmel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YzPwwuCe0HkJpkQe@shredder \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dqfext@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@kapio-technology.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangyuweihx@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.