Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] x86/fpu: Drop @perm from guest pseudo FPU container

[Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>]

On Tue, Apr 01, 2025 at 10:16:47AM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>On 3/18/2025 8:31 AM, Chao Gao wrote:
>> -static void fpu_init_guest_permissions(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
>> +static void fpu_lock_guest_permissions(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
>>   {
>>   	struct fpu_state_perm *fpuperm;
>>   	u64 perm;
>> @@ -218,8 +218,6 @@ static void fpu_init_guest_permissions(struct fpu_guest *gfpu)
>>   	WRITE_ONCE(fpuperm->__state_perm, perm | FPU_GUEST_PERM_LOCKED);
>>   	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
>> -
>> -	gfpu->perm = perm & ~FPU_GUEST_PERM_LOCKED;
>>   }
>
>With the removal, the function no longer requires a struct fpu_guest argument
>as it now operates solely on the group leader's FPU state.

Good catch! I will drop the fpu_guest argument.

>
>Thanks,
>Chang