From: yann.morin@orange.com
To: Christian Stewart <christian@aperture.us>
Cc: Thomas Perale <thomas.perale@mind.be>,
Fiona Klute <fiona.klute@gmx.de>,
Buildroot Mailing List <buildroot@buildroot.org>
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/containerd: fix build with toolchain without Gold linker
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:41:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6MyS48IVKJ8vhsC@yd-6wlzhs3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+h8R2qR95DDHn45tqUG57rSCRWpfWkVU2sd2GxpCDhkkzrr_w@mail.gmail.com>
Christian, All,
On 2025-02-05 01:20 -0800, Christian Stewart spake thusly:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025, 12:29 AM < [1]yann.morin@orange.com> wrote:
> So, I guess you only actually suggested moving setting -fuse-ld=bfd and
> -Wl,--no-pie flags into pkg-golang, right?
> My thinking is that we always want Go to have fuse-ld set to the correct "ld" we are using. So it makes sense to set this in
> pkg-golang.
> This way any new packages that have dynamic linking (cgo) will also pick up the fix as needed.
OK, that is for -fuse-ld=bfd. That makes sense.
What about -Wl,--no-pie, then? Does it also make sense to have in the
infra as well?
> When I initially needed -fuse-ld=bfd for filebeat, I did not feel very
> confident that we should do it unconditionally. Indeed, none of the
> {host-,}golang-package packages we had at that time needed it at all. So
> I concluded that filebeat was special (it was already special in a few
> other respects, so meh).
> It is just because it uses cgo, or am I wrong?
TBH, I just banged on it until it build and run. If cgo is the reason we
need to pass -fuse-ld=bfd, then that should be part of the condition,
no? i.e., something like (in pkg-golang.mk):
ifeq ($$(BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_GO_TARGET_CGO_LINKING_SUPPORTS),y)
ifeq ($$(BR2_aarch64),y)
$(2)_EXTLDFLAGS += -fuse-ld=bfd
endif # AArch64
endif # CGO linking
Or can we just pass it unconditionally, even if it is actually not going
to be used? I.e. do we need any condition at all, evem the AArch64 one?
If we want to introduce that assignment in the infra, we need to get as
much insights as possible to explain it, and we need to get affirmative
statements as to how we should set it.
I guess my patch adding FOO_EXTLDFLAGS would not change, but Fiona will
need that info if she is to respin a fix for containerd's build failure.
[--SNIP--]
> Still, I believe there should be a way for packages to be able to pass
> arbitrary extldflags, and thus the variable should be exposed.
> Yes, that variable should be exposed, I agree. It's useful to be able to pass extra ld flags as needed.
ACK, thanks for the feeback!
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
--
____________
.-----------------.--------------------: _ :------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | __/ ) | /"\ ASCII RIBBON |
| | Software Designer | _/ - /' | \ / CAMPAIGN |
| +33 638.411.245 '--------------------: (_ `--, | X AGAINST |
| yann.morin (at) orange.com |_=" ,--' | / \ HTML MAIL |
'--------------------------------------:______/_____:------------------'
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 14:32 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package/containerd: fix build with toolchain without Gold linker Fiona Klute via buildroot
2025-02-04 14:47 ` yann.morin
2025-02-04 18:36 ` Fiona Klute via buildroot
2025-02-04 20:29 ` Fiona Klute via buildroot
2025-02-04 21:23 ` Christian Stewart via buildroot
2025-02-05 8:03 ` Arnout Vandecappelle via buildroot
2025-02-05 8:29 ` yann.morin
2025-02-05 9:20 ` Christian Stewart via buildroot
2025-02-05 9:41 ` yann.morin [this message]
2025-02-05 9:42 ` Arnout Vandecappelle via buildroot
2025-02-05 10:24 ` Fiona Klute via buildroot
2025-02-05 10:33 ` Arnout Vandecappelle via buildroot
2025-02-05 11:40 ` Fiona Klute via buildroot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6MyS48IVKJ8vhsC@yd-6wlzhs3 \
--to=yann.morin@orange.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=christian@aperture.us \
--cc=fiona.klute@gmx.de \
--cc=thomas.perale@mind.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.