From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 3/3] igb: Get rid of spurious interrupts
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:58:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6pMPhn5Igl212kd@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210-igb_irq-v1-3-bde078cdb9df@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:19:37AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> When running the igc with XDP/ZC in busy polling mode with deferral of hard
> interrupts, interrupts still happen from time to time. That is caused by
> the igc task watchdog which triggers Rx interrupts periodically.
>
> That mechanism has been introduced to overcome skb/memory allocation
> failures [1]. So the Rx clean functions stop processing the Rx ring in case
> of such failure. The task watchdog triggers Rx interrupts periodically in
> the hope that memory became available in the mean time.
>
> The current behavior is undesirable for real time applications, because the
> driver induced Rx interrupts trigger also the softirq processing. However,
> all real time packets should be processed by the application which uses the
> busy polling method.
>
> Therefore, only trigger the Rx interrupts in case of real allocation
> failures. Introduce a new flag for signaling that condition.
>
> Follow the same logic as in commit 8dcf2c212078 ("igc: Get rid of spurious
> interrupts").
>
> [1] - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=3be507547e6177e5c808544bd6a2efa2c7f1d436
>
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I am not an igb expert (nor do I have such a device), but after
reading the source a bit this seems reasonable.
I suppose perhaps a better direction in the future would be to
convert the driver to the page pool, but in the meantime the
proposed change seems reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] igb: Get rid of spurious interrupts
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:58:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6pMPhn5Igl212kd@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210-igb_irq-v1-3-bde078cdb9df@linutronix.de>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:19:37AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> When running the igc with XDP/ZC in busy polling mode with deferral of hard
> interrupts, interrupts still happen from time to time. That is caused by
> the igc task watchdog which triggers Rx interrupts periodically.
>
> That mechanism has been introduced to overcome skb/memory allocation
> failures [1]. So the Rx clean functions stop processing the Rx ring in case
> of such failure. The task watchdog triggers Rx interrupts periodically in
> the hope that memory became available in the mean time.
>
> The current behavior is undesirable for real time applications, because the
> driver induced Rx interrupts trigger also the softirq processing. However,
> all real time packets should be processed by the application which uses the
> busy polling method.
>
> Therefore, only trigger the Rx interrupts in case of real allocation
> failures. Introduce a new flag for signaling that condition.
>
> Follow the same logic as in commit 8dcf2c212078 ("igc: Get rid of spurious
> interrupts").
>
> [1] - https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git/commit/?id=3be507547e6177e5c808544bd6a2efa2c7f1d436
>
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I am not an igb expert (nor do I have such a device), but after
reading the source a bit this seems reasonable.
I suppose perhaps a better direction in the future would be to
convert the driver to the page pool, but in the meantime the
proposed change seems reasonable.
Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-10 9:19 [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 9:19 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 9:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 1/3] igb: Link IRQs to NAPI instances Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 9:19 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 18:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Joe Damato
2025-02-10 18:25 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-10 22:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Joe Damato
2025-02-10 22:22 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-10 9:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/3] igb: Link queues " Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 9:19 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 18:47 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Joe Damato
2025-02-10 18:47 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-11 7:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-11 7:51 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 9:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 3/3] igb: Get rid of spurious interrupts Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 9:19 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 18:58 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2025-02-10 18:58 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-10 20:14 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Gerhard Engleder
2025-02-10 20:14 ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-02-11 7:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-11 7:51 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 19:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up Joe Damato
2025-02-10 19:49 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-11 3:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Joe Damato
2025-02-11 3:15 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-11 14:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-11 14:44 ` Kurt Kanzenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6pMPhn5Igl212kd@LQ3V64L9R2 \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.