From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"Przemek Kitszel" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/16] idpf: fix Rx descriptor ready check barrier in splitq
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8rHp046ELv2wrac@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305162132.1106080-6-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 05:21:21PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> No idea what the current barrier position was meant for. At that point,
> nothing is read from the descriptor, only the pointer to the actual one
> is fetched.
> The correct barrier usage here is after the generation check, so that
> only the first qword is read if the descriptor is not yet ready and we
> need to stop polling. Debatable on coherent DMA as the Rx descriptor
> size is <= cacheline size, but anyway, the current barrier position
> only makes the codegen worse.
Makes sense:
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
But you know the process... :P fixes should go to -net.
>
> Fixes: 3a8845af66ed ("idpf: add RX splitq napi poll support")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index 6254806c2072..c15833928ea1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -3232,18 +3232,14 @@ static int idpf_rx_splitq_clean(struct idpf_rx_queue *rxq, int budget)
> /* get the Rx desc from Rx queue based on 'next_to_clean' */
> rx_desc = &rxq->rx[ntc].flex_adv_nic_3_wb;
>
> - /* This memory barrier is needed to keep us from reading
> - * any other fields out of the rx_desc
> - */
> - dma_rmb();
> -
> /* if the descriptor isn't done, no work yet to do */
> gen_id = le16_get_bits(rx_desc->pktlen_gen_bufq_id,
> VIRTCHNL2_RX_FLEX_DESC_ADV_GEN_M);
> -
> if (idpf_queue_has(GEN_CHK, rxq) != gen_id)
> break;
>
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> rxdid = FIELD_GET(VIRTCHNL2_RX_FLEX_DESC_ADV_RXDID_M,
> rx_desc->rxdid_ucast);
> if (rxdid != VIRTCHNL2_RXDID_2_FLEX_SPLITQ) {
> --
> 2.48.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@intel.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"Przemek Kitszel" <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next 05/16] idpf: fix Rx descriptor ready check barrier in splitq
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 11:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8rHp046ELv2wrac@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250305162132.1106080-6-aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 05:21:21PM +0100, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> No idea what the current barrier position was meant for. At that point,
> nothing is read from the descriptor, only the pointer to the actual one
> is fetched.
> The correct barrier usage here is after the generation check, so that
> only the first qword is read if the descriptor is not yet ready and we
> need to stop polling. Debatable on coherent DMA as the Rx descriptor
> size is <= cacheline size, but anyway, the current barrier position
> only makes the codegen worse.
Makes sense:
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
But you know the process... :P fixes should go to -net.
>
> Fixes: 3a8845af66ed ("idpf: add RX splitq napi poll support")
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> index 6254806c2072..c15833928ea1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_txrx.c
> @@ -3232,18 +3232,14 @@ static int idpf_rx_splitq_clean(struct idpf_rx_queue *rxq, int budget)
> /* get the Rx desc from Rx queue based on 'next_to_clean' */
> rx_desc = &rxq->rx[ntc].flex_adv_nic_3_wb;
>
> - /* This memory barrier is needed to keep us from reading
> - * any other fields out of the rx_desc
> - */
> - dma_rmb();
> -
> /* if the descriptor isn't done, no work yet to do */
> gen_id = le16_get_bits(rx_desc->pktlen_gen_bufq_id,
> VIRTCHNL2_RX_FLEX_DESC_ADV_GEN_M);
> -
> if (idpf_queue_has(GEN_CHK, rxq) != gen_id)
> break;
>
> + dma_rmb();
> +
> rxdid = FIELD_GET(VIRTCHNL2_RX_FLEX_DESC_ADV_RXDID_M,
> rx_desc->rxdid_ucast);
> if (rxdid != VIRTCHNL2_RXDID_2_FLEX_SPLITQ) {
> --
> 2.48.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-05 16:21 [PATCH net-next 00/16] idpf: add XDP support Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 01/16] libeth: convert to netmem Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-06 0:13 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-06 0:13 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Mina Almasry
2025-03-11 17:22 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 17:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 17:43 ` Mina Almasry
2025-03-11 17:43 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Mina Almasry
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 02/16] libeth: support native XDP and register memory model Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 03/16] libeth: add a couple of XDP helpers (libeth_xdp) Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 14:05 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-11 14:05 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-17 15:26 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-17 15:26 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-19 16:19 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-19 16:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-01 13:11 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-01 13:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:38 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:22 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:51 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 04/16] libeth: add XSk helpers Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:15 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 10:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:03 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-12 17:03 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 05/16] idpf: fix Rx descriptor ready check barrier in splitq Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:17 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2025-03-07 10:17 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:10 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-12 17:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 06/16] idpf: a use saner limit for default number of queues to allocate Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:32 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 10:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:22 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-12 17:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 07/16] idpf: link NAPIs to queues Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-03-07 10:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Eric Dumazet
2025-03-12 17:16 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-12 17:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-18 17:10 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-18 17:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 10:51 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 10:51 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-12 17:25 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-12 17:25 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 08/16] idpf: make complq cleaning dependent on scheduling mode Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 11:11 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 11:11 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-13 16:16 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-13 16:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 09/16] idpf: remove SW marker handling from NAPI Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 11:42 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 11:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-13 16:50 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-13 16:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 10/16] idpf: add support for nointerrupt queues Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 12:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 12:10 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-13 16:19 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-13 16:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 11/16] idpf: prepare structures to support XDP Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 1:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-07 1:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-12 14:00 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 13:27 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 13:27 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-17 14:50 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-17 14:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-19 16:29 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-19 16:29 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 13:42 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 12/16] idpf: implement XDP_SETUP_PROG in ndo_bpf for splitq Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-07 14:16 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-07 14:16 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-17 14:58 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-17 14:58 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-19 16:23 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-19 16:23 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 13/16] idpf: use generic functions to build xdp_buff and skb Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 14/16] idpf: add support for XDP on Rx Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 15:50 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-11 15:50 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 13:28 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 15:53 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 15:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 15/16] idpf: add support for .ndo_xdp_xmit() Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 16:08 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-03-11 16:08 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2025-04-08 13:31 ` Alexander Lobakin
2025-04-08 13:31 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [PATCH net-next 16/16] idpf: add XDP RSS hash hint Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-05 16:21 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 15:28 ` [PATCH net-next 00/16] idpf: add XDP support Alexander Lobakin
2025-03-11 15:28 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8rHp046ELv2wrac@boxer \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kubiak@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.