From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:39:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDUc1Ya/ybwjo4DC@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230410183219.191543-1-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:32:14AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Start to move the initialization of some lock from
> i915_driver_early_probe().
> No dkl function is called prior to intel_setup_outputs(), so this is
> a good place to initialize it.
I disagree. We don't want to sprinke these all over the place.
> This will also fix a warning in Xe kmd:
>
> [ 201.894839] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [ENCODER:235:DDI A/PHY A] failed to retrieve link info, disabling eDP
> [ 202.136336] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Failed to write source OUI
> [ 202.175346] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [ 202.175347] irq event stamp: 754060
> [ 202.175359] hardirqs last enabled at (754059): [<ffffffff8122cf79>] tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x59/0x80
> [ 202.180294] The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> [ 202.183774] hardirqs last disabled at (754060): [<ffffffff811a5539>] do_idle+0x99/0x230
> [ 202.192734] you didn't initialize this object before use?
> [ 202.198951] softirqs last enabled at (753948): [<ffffffff8114abae>] irq_exit_rcu+0xbe/0x130
> [ 202.206882] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [ 202.212236] softirqs last disabled at (753943): [<ffffffff8114abae>] irq_exit_rcu+0xbe/0x130
> [ 202.220592] CPU: 2 PID: 1415 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 6.3.0-rc4+zeh-xe+ #909
> [ 202.243002] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Raptor Lake Client Platform/RaptorLake-P LP5 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.3361.A14.2211151548 11/15/2022
> [ 202.255737] Call Trace:
> [ 202.258179] <TASK>
> [ 202.260275] dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0xc0
> [ 202.263922] register_lock_class+0x756/0x7d0
> [ 202.268165] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
> [ 202.271975] __lock_acquire+0x72/0x28b0
> [ 202.275786] ? debug_object_free+0xb4/0x160
> [ 202.279946] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0
> [ 202.283503] ? intel_dkl_phy_read+0x18/0x60 [xe]
> [ 202.288181] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
> [ 202.291825] ? intel_dkl_phy_read+0x18/0x60 [xe]
> [ 202.296475] intel_dkl_phy_read+0x18/0x60 [xe]
> [ 202.300949] icl_aux_power_well_enable+0x2bd/0x400 [xe]
> [ 202.306202] ? intel_display_power_grab_async_put_ref+0x75/0x120 [xe]
> [ 202.312649] intel_power_well_enable+0x1c/0x70 [xe]
> [ 202.317543] __intel_display_power_get_domain.part.0+0x4d/0x70 [xe]
> [ 202.323812] intel_display_power_get+0x43/0x70 [xe]
> [ 202.328708] intel_tc_port_init+0x199/0x2a0 [xe]
> [ 202.333363] intel_ddi_init+0x6ad/0xb00 [xe]
> [ 202.337678] intel_modeset_init_nogem+0x536/0x6d0 [xe]
> [ 202.342838] xe_display_init_noaccel+0x19/0x40 [xe]
> [ 202.347743] xe_device_probe+0x1f5/0x2a0 [xe]
> [ 202.352127] xe_pci_probe+0x28c/0x480 [xe]
> [ 202.356260] pci_device_probe+0x9d/0x150
> [ 202.360164] really_probe+0x19a/0x400
> [ 202.363809] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10
> [ 202.368226] __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x170
> [ 202.372558] driver_probe_device+0x1a/0x90
> [ 202.376632] __driver_attach+0xcd/0x1c0
> [ 202.380442] bus_for_each_dev+0x72/0xc0
> [ 202.384253] bus_add_driver+0x110/0x210
> [ 202.388063] driver_register+0x50/0x100
> [ 202.391873] ? __pfx_init_module+0x10/0x10 [xe]
> [ 202.396431] do_one_initcall+0x55/0x260
> [ 202.400245] ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
> [ 202.404058] ? kmalloc_trace+0xa0/0xb0
> [ 202.407786] do_init_module+0x45/0x1e0
> [ 202.411512] __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
> [ 202.415838] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
> [ 202.419397] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> [ 202.424409] RIP: 0033:0x7fd11291ea3d
> [ 202.427967] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c3 a3 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> [ 202.446530] RSP: 002b:00007ffffde11368 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
> [ 202.454031] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005616a617f210 RCX: 00007fd11291ea3d
> [ 202.461106] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00005616a617fe60 RDI: 000000000000000e
> [ 202.468182] RBP: 0000000000040000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002
> [ 202.475250] R10: 000000000000000e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005616a617fe60
> [ 202.482319] R13: 00005616a617f340 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005616a6180650
> [ 202.489396] </TASK>
>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 24c96f388d521..cf3a3b3afdd13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> #include "intel_display_debugfs.h"
> #include "intel_display_power.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> +#include "intel_dkl_phy.h"
> #include "intel_dmc.h"
> #include "intel_dp.h"
> #include "intel_dp_link_training.h"
> @@ -7883,6 +7884,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> + intel_dkl_phy_init(dev_priv);
> +
> if (IS_DG2(dev_priv)) {
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> index 57cc3edba0163..5bce7b5b27bc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> @@ -104,3 +104,9 @@ intel_dkl_phy_posting_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_r
>
> spin_unlock(&i915->display.dkl.phy_lock);
> }
> +
> +void
> +intel_dkl_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&i915->display.dkl.phy_lock);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h
> index 570ee36f9386f..615429b6392c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h
> @@ -20,5 +20,7 @@ void
> intel_dkl_phy_rmw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_reg reg, u32 clear, u32 set);
> void
> intel_dkl_phy_posting_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_reg reg);
> +void
> +intel_dkl_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_DKL_PHY_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 066d79c2069c4..6fe1a97cc246d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static int i915_driver_early_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.wm.wm_mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.pps.mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.hdcp.comp_mutex);
> - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->display.dkl.phy_lock);
>
> i915_memcpy_init_early(dev_priv);
> intel_runtime_pm_init_early(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> --
> 2.40.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "José Roberto de Souza" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 11:39:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDUc1Ya/ybwjo4DC@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230410183219.191543-1-jose.souza@intel.com>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:32:14AM -0700, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> Start to move the initialization of some lock from
> i915_driver_early_probe().
> No dkl function is called prior to intel_setup_outputs(), so this is
> a good place to initialize it.
I disagree. We don't want to sprinke these all over the place.
> This will also fix a warning in Xe kmd:
>
> [ 201.894839] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] [ENCODER:235:DDI A/PHY A] failed to retrieve link info, disabling eDP
> [ 202.136336] xe 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Failed to write source OUI
> [ 202.175346] INFO: trying to register non-static key.
> [ 202.175347] irq event stamp: 754060
> [ 202.175359] hardirqs last enabled at (754059): [<ffffffff8122cf79>] tick_nohz_idle_enter+0x59/0x80
> [ 202.180294] The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
> [ 202.183774] hardirqs last disabled at (754060): [<ffffffff811a5539>] do_idle+0x99/0x230
> [ 202.192734] you didn't initialize this object before use?
> [ 202.198951] softirqs last enabled at (753948): [<ffffffff8114abae>] irq_exit_rcu+0xbe/0x130
> [ 202.206882] turning off the locking correctness validator.
> [ 202.212236] softirqs last disabled at (753943): [<ffffffff8114abae>] irq_exit_rcu+0xbe/0x130
> [ 202.220592] CPU: 2 PID: 1415 Comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 6.3.0-rc4+zeh-xe+ #909
> [ 202.243002] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Raptor Lake Client Platform/RaptorLake-P LP5 RVP, BIOS RPLPFWI1.R00.3361.A14.2211151548 11/15/2022
> [ 202.255737] Call Trace:
> [ 202.258179] <TASK>
> [ 202.260275] dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0xc0
> [ 202.263922] register_lock_class+0x756/0x7d0
> [ 202.268165] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
> [ 202.271975] __lock_acquire+0x72/0x28b0
> [ 202.275786] ? debug_object_free+0xb4/0x160
> [ 202.279946] lock_acquire+0xd1/0x2d0
> [ 202.283503] ? intel_dkl_phy_read+0x18/0x60 [xe]
> [ 202.288181] _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40
> [ 202.291825] ? intel_dkl_phy_read+0x18/0x60 [xe]
> [ 202.296475] intel_dkl_phy_read+0x18/0x60 [xe]
> [ 202.300949] icl_aux_power_well_enable+0x2bd/0x400 [xe]
> [ 202.306202] ? intel_display_power_grab_async_put_ref+0x75/0x120 [xe]
> [ 202.312649] intel_power_well_enable+0x1c/0x70 [xe]
> [ 202.317543] __intel_display_power_get_domain.part.0+0x4d/0x70 [xe]
> [ 202.323812] intel_display_power_get+0x43/0x70 [xe]
> [ 202.328708] intel_tc_port_init+0x199/0x2a0 [xe]
> [ 202.333363] intel_ddi_init+0x6ad/0xb00 [xe]
> [ 202.337678] intel_modeset_init_nogem+0x536/0x6d0 [xe]
> [ 202.342838] xe_display_init_noaccel+0x19/0x40 [xe]
> [ 202.347743] xe_device_probe+0x1f5/0x2a0 [xe]
> [ 202.352127] xe_pci_probe+0x28c/0x480 [xe]
> [ 202.356260] pci_device_probe+0x9d/0x150
> [ 202.360164] really_probe+0x19a/0x400
> [ 202.363809] ? __pfx___driver_attach+0x10/0x10
> [ 202.368226] __driver_probe_device+0x73/0x170
> [ 202.372558] driver_probe_device+0x1a/0x90
> [ 202.376632] __driver_attach+0xcd/0x1c0
> [ 202.380442] bus_for_each_dev+0x72/0xc0
> [ 202.384253] bus_add_driver+0x110/0x210
> [ 202.388063] driver_register+0x50/0x100
> [ 202.391873] ? __pfx_init_module+0x10/0x10 [xe]
> [ 202.396431] do_one_initcall+0x55/0x260
> [ 202.400245] ? rcu_is_watching+0xd/0x40
> [ 202.404058] ? kmalloc_trace+0xa0/0xb0
> [ 202.407786] do_init_module+0x45/0x1e0
> [ 202.411512] __do_sys_finit_module+0xac/0x120
> [ 202.415838] do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
> [ 202.419397] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
> [ 202.424409] RIP: 0033:0x7fd11291ea3d
> [ 202.427967] Code: 5b 41 5c c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d c3 a3 0f 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> [ 202.446530] RSP: 002b:00007ffffde11368 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000139
> [ 202.454031] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005616a617f210 RCX: 00007fd11291ea3d
> [ 202.461106] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00005616a617fe60 RDI: 000000000000000e
> [ 202.468182] RBP: 0000000000040000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000002
> [ 202.475250] R10: 000000000000000e R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00005616a617fe60
> [ 202.482319] R13: 00005616a617f340 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00005616a6180650
> [ 202.489396] </TASK>
>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c | 1 -
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 24c96f388d521..cf3a3b3afdd13 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@
> #include "intel_display_debugfs.h"
> #include "intel_display_power.h"
> #include "intel_display_types.h"
> +#include "intel_dkl_phy.h"
> #include "intel_dmc.h"
> #include "intel_dp.h"
> #include "intel_dp_link_training.h"
> @@ -7883,6 +7884,8 @@ static void intel_setup_outputs(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> if (!HAS_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
> return;
>
> + intel_dkl_phy_init(dev_priv);
> +
> if (IS_DG2(dev_priv)) {
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_A);
> intel_ddi_init(dev_priv, PORT_B);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> index 57cc3edba0163..5bce7b5b27bc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.c
> @@ -104,3 +104,9 @@ intel_dkl_phy_posting_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_r
>
> spin_unlock(&i915->display.dkl.phy_lock);
> }
> +
> +void
> +intel_dkl_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + spin_lock_init(&i915->display.dkl.phy_lock);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h
> index 570ee36f9386f..615429b6392c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dkl_phy.h
> @@ -20,5 +20,7 @@ void
> intel_dkl_phy_rmw(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_reg reg, u32 clear, u32 set);
> void
> intel_dkl_phy_posting_read(struct drm_i915_private *i915, struct intel_dkl_phy_reg reg);
> +void
> +intel_dkl_phy_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_DKL_PHY_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> index 066d79c2069c4..6fe1a97cc246d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_driver.c
> @@ -224,7 +224,6 @@ static int i915_driver_early_probe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.wm.wm_mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.pps.mutex);
> mutex_init(&dev_priv->display.hdcp.comp_mutex);
> - spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->display.dkl.phy_lock);
>
> i915_memcpy_init_early(dev_priv);
> intel_runtime_pm_init_early(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> --
> 2.40.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-11 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 18:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/6] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-xe] " José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/6] drm/i915: Only initialize dlk phy lock in display 12 and newer José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-xe] " José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-11 8:38 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-11 8:38 ` [Intel-xe] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 3/6] fixup! drm/i915/display: Remaining changes to make xe compile José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 4/6] TEMPORARY: drm/xe/display: Enable modular fia in TGL José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 5/6] drm/xe/display: Disable PSR HW tracking by default in all display versions José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 18:32 ` [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 6/6] drm/xe: Enable Raptorlake-P José Roberto de Souza
2023-04-10 19:02 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for series starting with [v3,1/6] drm/i915: Initialize dkl_phy spin lock from display code path Patchwork
2023-04-10 19:03 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.KUnit: " Patchwork
2023-04-10 19:07 ` [Intel-xe] ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2023-04-10 19:29 ` [Intel-xe] ○ CI.BAT: info " Patchwork
2023-04-11 8:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] [PATCH v3 1/6] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 8:32 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 8:33 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 8:33 ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 13:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2023-04-11 13:24 ` Souza, Jose
2023-04-11 8:39 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-04-11 8:39 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-11 8:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 8:51 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 9:12 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-11 9:12 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-11 9:14 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 9:14 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-11 14:51 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-11 14:51 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Rodrigo Vivi
2023-04-11 19:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-11 19:59 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-11 20:07 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Souza, Jose
2023-04-11 20:07 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2023-04-11 21:20 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-11 21:20 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Lucas De Marchi
2023-04-12 17:13 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Souza, Jose
2023-04-12 17:13 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Souza, Jose
2023-04-13 8:22 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-13 8:22 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-13 9:49 ` [Intel-gfx] [Intel-xe] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-13 9:49 ` [Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZDUc1Ya/ybwjo4DC@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.