Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64/sysreg: More conversions to automatic generation

From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64/sysreg: More conversions to automatic generation
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 21:41:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZG/WF22mB4PiJdl4@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230419-arm64-syreg-gen-v2-0-4c6add1f6257@kernel.org>

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:36:58PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Continue working through the register defintions, converting them to
> automatic generation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Also convert OSECCR_EL1, OSDTRRX_EL1 and OSDTRTX_EL1 instead of
>   dropping them.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230419-arm64-syreg-gen-v1-0-936cd769cb9e@kernel.org
> 
> ---
> Mark Brown (7):
>       arm64/sysreg: Convert MDCCINT_EL1 to automatic register generation
>       arm64/sysreg: Convert MDSCR_EL1 to automatic register generation
>       arm64/sysreg: Standardise naming of bitfield constants in OSL[AS]R_EL1
>       arm64/sysreg: Convert OSLAR_EL1 to automatic generation
>       arm64/sysreg: Convert OSDTRRX_EL1 to automatic generation
>       arm64/sysreg: Convert OSDTRTX_EL1 to automatic generation
>       arm64/sysreg: Convert OSECCR_EL1 to automatic generation

Besides the one comment I had:

Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>

I imagine these will go through the arm64 tree right? The KVM diff is
miniscule.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver