From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: taras.chornyi@plvision.eu, petrm@nvidia.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
taspelund@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, edumazet@google.com, jhs@mojatatu.com,
roopa@nvidia.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
saeedm@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGd+9CUBM+eWG5FR@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ed139d5-6cb9-90c7-323c-22cf916e96a0@blackwall.org>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:08:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 18/05/2023 14:33, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> > index fc17b9fd93e6..d8ab5890cbe6 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> > return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
> >
> > memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb));
> > + skb->l2_miss = 0;
> >
> > p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> > if (p->flags & BR_VLAN_TUNNEL)
>
> Overall looks good, only this part is a bit worrisome and needs some additional
> investigation because now we'll unconditionally dirty a cache line for every
> packet that is forwarded. Could you please check the effect with perf?
To eliminate it I tried the approach we discussed yesterday:
First, add the miss indication to the bridge's control block which is
zeroed for every skb entering the bridge:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index 2119729ded2b..bd5c18286a40 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb {
#endif
u8 proxyarp_replied:1;
u8 src_port_isolated:1;
+ u8 miss:1; /* FDB or MDB lookup miss */
#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING
u8 vlan_filtered:1;
#endif
And set this bit upon misses instead of skb->l2_miss:
@@ -203,6 +205,8 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_bridge_port *prev = NULL;
struct net_bridge_port *p;
+ BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1;
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &br->port_list, list) {
/* Do not flood unicast traffic to ports that turn it off, nor
* other traffic if flood off, except for traffic we originate
@@ -295,6 +299,7 @@ void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst,
allow_mode_include = false;
} else {
p = NULL;
+ BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1;
}
while (p || rp) {
Then copy it to skb->l2_miss at the very end where the cache line
containing this field is already written to:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
index 84d6dd5e5b1a..89f65564e338 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
br_switchdev_frame_set_offload_fwd_mark(skb);
+ skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss;
+
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
return 0;
Also for locally received packets:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb);
+ skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss;
+
/* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the
* packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone
* may be running packet capture.
Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work.
WDYT?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, roopa@nvidia.com, taras.chornyi@plvision.eu,
saeedm@nvidia.com, leon@kernel.org, petrm@nvidia.com,
vladimir.oltean@nxp.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
taspelund@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZGd+9CUBM+eWG5FR@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ed139d5-6cb9-90c7-323c-22cf916e96a0@blackwall.org>
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:08:47PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 18/05/2023 14:33, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> > index fc17b9fd93e6..d8ab5890cbe6 100644
> > --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> > +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> > @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ static rx_handler_result_t br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
> > return RX_HANDLER_CONSUMED;
> >
> > memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct br_input_skb_cb));
> > + skb->l2_miss = 0;
> >
> > p = br_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
> > if (p->flags & BR_VLAN_TUNNEL)
>
> Overall looks good, only this part is a bit worrisome and needs some additional
> investigation because now we'll unconditionally dirty a cache line for every
> packet that is forwarded. Could you please check the effect with perf?
To eliminate it I tried the approach we discussed yesterday:
First, add the miss indication to the bridge's control block which is
zeroed for every skb entering the bridge:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index 2119729ded2b..bd5c18286a40 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -581,6 +581,7 @@ struct br_input_skb_cb {
#endif
u8 proxyarp_replied:1;
u8 src_port_isolated:1;
+ u8 miss:1; /* FDB or MDB lookup miss */
#ifdef CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING
u8 vlan_filtered:1;
#endif
And set this bit upon misses instead of skb->l2_miss:
@@ -203,6 +205,8 @@ void br_flood(struct net_bridge *br, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct net_bridge_port *prev = NULL;
struct net_bridge_port *p;
+ BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1;
+
list_for_each_entry_rcu(p, &br->port_list, list) {
/* Do not flood unicast traffic to ports that turn it off, nor
* other traffic if flood off, except for traffic we originate
@@ -295,6 +299,7 @@ void br_multicast_flood(struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mdst,
allow_mode_include = false;
} else {
p = NULL;
+ BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss = 1;
}
while (p || rp) {
Then copy it to skb->l2_miss at the very end where the cache line
containing this field is already written to:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_forward.c b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
index 84d6dd5e5b1a..89f65564e338 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_forward.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_forward.c
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ int br_dev_queue_push_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
br_switchdev_frame_set_offload_fwd_mark(skb);
+ skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss;
+
dev_queue_xmit(skb);
return 0;
Also for locally received packets:
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
@@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb)
*/
br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb);
+ skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss;
+
/* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the
* packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone
* may be running packet capture.
Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work.
WDYT?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-19 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-18 11:33 [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add layer 2 miss indication and filtering Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss indication Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 16:08 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-18 16:08 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-19 13:51 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2023-05-19 13:51 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-19 21:52 ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-19 21:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-23 8:10 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-05-23 8:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-23 9:04 ` [Bridge] " Paolo Abeni
2023-05-23 9:04 ` Paolo Abeni
2023-05-23 11:34 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-05-23 11:34 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-23 13:03 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-23 13:03 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-23 20:29 ` [Bridge] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-23 20:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-05-21 7:34 ` [Bridge] " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-21 7:34 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2023-05-18 11:33 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 2/5] net/sched: flower: Allow matching on layer 2 miss Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-19 11:27 ` [Bridge] " Simon Horman
2023-05-19 11:27 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-18 11:33 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 3/5] flow_offload: Reject " Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-19 11:33 ` [Bridge] " Simon Horman
2023-05-19 11:33 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-19 14:10 ` [Bridge] " Ido Schimmel
2023-05-19 14:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-19 14:15 ` [Bridge] " Simon Horman
2023-05-19 14:15 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-18 11:33 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 4/5] mlxsw: spectrum_flower: Add ability to match " Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Ido Schimmel
2023-05-19 11:35 ` [Bridge] " Simon Horman
2023-05-19 11:35 ` Simon Horman
2023-05-18 11:33 ` [Bridge] [PATCH net-next 5/5] selftests: forwarding: Add layer 2 miss test cases Ido Schimmel
2023-05-18 11:33 ` Ido Schimmel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZGd+9CUBM+eWG5FR@shredder \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=taras.chornyi@plvision.eu \
--cc=taspelund@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.