All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:59:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzSHDPR7Jfoz/G8@ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com>

On 07/11/23 at 11:53am, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:35:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/10/23 at 05:14pm, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > > > still returns all CPUs.
> > > > 
> > > > That's simply broken.  Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > > > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
> > > 
> > > That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> > > 
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> > > simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
> > 
> > I don't know maxcpus on arm and ppc64 well. But maxcpus=1 or nr_cpus=1
> > are suggested parameter. Because usually nr_cpus=1 is enough to make
> > kdump kernel work well to capture vmcore. However, user is allowed to
> > specify nr_cpus=n (n>1) if they think multiple cpus are needed in kdump
> > kernel. Your hard coding of cpu number in kdump kernel may be not so
> > reasonable.
> 
> As I mentioned, for arm/ppc64, passing 'maxcpus=1' actually follows
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> 
> 'nr_cpus=N' just works fine, so not related with this topic.
> 
> After 'maxcpus=1' is passed, kernel only brings up one of cpu cores as
> online during booting, and others still can be put into online by
> userspace. Now this way causes IO timeout on some storage device which
> uses managed irq and supports multiple io queues.
> 
> Here the focus is if passing 'maxcpus=1' is valid for kdump
> kernel, that is we want to hear from our arch/kdump guys.

Yes, 'maxcpus=1' is valid and suggested on ppc64 for kdump kernel
if needed, because there's no 'nr_cpus=' support on ppc64 yet.

> 
> If yes, something needs to be fixed, such as, what this patchset is
> doing.
> 
> > 
> > Please cc kexec mailing list when posting so that people can view the
> > whole thread of discussion.
> 
> Already Cc kexe & arm/powerpc & irq list.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:59:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzSHDPR7Jfoz/G8@ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com>

On 07/11/23 at 11:53am, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:35:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/10/23 at 05:14pm, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > > > still returns all CPUs.
> > > > 
> > > > That's simply broken.  Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > > > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
> > > 
> > > That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> > > 
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> > > simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
> > 
> > I don't know maxcpus on arm and ppc64 well. But maxcpus=1 or nr_cpus=1
> > are suggested parameter. Because usually nr_cpus=1 is enough to make
> > kdump kernel work well to capture vmcore. However, user is allowed to
> > specify nr_cpus=n (n>1) if they think multiple cpus are needed in kdump
> > kernel. Your hard coding of cpu number in kdump kernel may be not so
> > reasonable.
> 
> As I mentioned, for arm/ppc64, passing 'maxcpus=1' actually follows
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> 
> 'nr_cpus=N' just works fine, so not related with this topic.
> 
> After 'maxcpus=1' is passed, kernel only brings up one of cpu cores as
> online during booting, and others still can be put into online by
> userspace. Now this way causes IO timeout on some storage device which
> uses managed irq and supports multiple io queues.
> 
> Here the focus is if passing 'maxcpus=1' is valid for kdump
> kernel, that is we want to hear from our arch/kdump guys.

Yes, 'maxcpus=1' is valid and suggested on ppc64 for kdump kernel
if needed, because there's no 'nr_cpus=' support on ppc64 yet.

> 
> If yes, something needs to be fixed, such as, what this patchset is
> doing.
> 
> > 
> > Please cc kexec mailing list when posting so that people can view the
> > whole thread of discussion.
> 
> Already Cc kexe & arm/powerpc & irq list.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:59:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzSHDPR7Jfoz/G8@ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com>

On 07/11/23 at 11:53am, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:35:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/10/23 at 05:14pm, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > > > still returns all CPUs.
> > > > 
> > > > That's simply broken.  Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > > > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
> > > 
> > > That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> > > 
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> > > simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
> > 
> > I don't know maxcpus on arm and ppc64 well. But maxcpus=1 or nr_cpus=1
> > are suggested parameter. Because usually nr_cpus=1 is enough to make
> > kdump kernel work well to capture vmcore. However, user is allowed to
> > specify nr_cpus=n (n>1) if they think multiple cpus are needed in kdump
> > kernel. Your hard coding of cpu number in kdump kernel may be not so
> > reasonable.
> 
> As I mentioned, for arm/ppc64, passing 'maxcpus=1' actually follows
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> 
> 'nr_cpus=N' just works fine, so not related with this topic.
> 
> After 'maxcpus=1' is passed, kernel only brings up one of cpu cores as
> online during booting, and others still can be put into online by
> userspace. Now this way causes IO timeout on some storage device which
> uses managed irq and supports multiple io queues.
> 
> Here the focus is if passing 'maxcpus=1' is valid for kdump
> kernel, that is we want to hear from our arch/kdump guys.

Yes, 'maxcpus=1' is valid and suggested on ppc64 for kdump kernel
if needed, because there's no 'nr_cpus=' support on ppc64 yet.

> 
> If yes, something needs to be fixed, such as, what this patchset is
> doing.
> 
> > 
> > Please cc kexec mailing list when posting so that people can view the
> > whole thread of discussion.
> 
> Already Cc kexe & arm/powerpc & irq list.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Wen Xiong <wenxiong@linux.ibm.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 14:59:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZKzSHDPR7Jfoz/G8@ovpn-8-26.pek2.redhat.com>

On 07/11/23 at 11:53am, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Baoquan,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:35:50AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 07/10/23 at 05:14pm, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 08:41:09AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 10:02:59AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > Take blk-mq's knowledge into account for calculating io queues.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Fix wrong queue mapping in case of kdump kernel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed to kdump command line, see
> > > > > `Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst`, so num_possible_cpus()
> > > > > still returns all CPUs.
> > > > 
> > > > That's simply broken.  Please fix the arch code to make sure
> > > > it does not return a bogus num_possible_cpus value for these
> > > 
> > > That is documented in Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> > > 
> > > On arm and ppc64, 'maxcpus=1' is passed for kdump kernel, and "maxcpu=1"
> > > simply keep one of CPU cores as online, and others as offline.
> > 
> > I don't know maxcpus on arm and ppc64 well. But maxcpus=1 or nr_cpus=1
> > are suggested parameter. Because usually nr_cpus=1 is enough to make
> > kdump kernel work well to capture vmcore. However, user is allowed to
> > specify nr_cpus=n (n>1) if they think multiple cpus are needed in kdump
> > kernel. Your hard coding of cpu number in kdump kernel may be not so
> > reasonable.
> 
> As I mentioned, for arm/ppc64, passing 'maxcpus=1' actually follows
> Documentation/admin-guide/kdump/kdump.rst.
> 
> 'nr_cpus=N' just works fine, so not related with this topic.
> 
> After 'maxcpus=1' is passed, kernel only brings up one of cpu cores as
> online during booting, and others still can be put into online by
> userspace. Now this way causes IO timeout on some storage device which
> uses managed irq and supports multiple io queues.
> 
> Here the focus is if passing 'maxcpus=1' is valid for kdump
> kernel, that is we want to hear from our arch/kdump guys.

Yes, 'maxcpus=1' is valid and suggested on ppc64 for kdump kernel
if needed, because there's no 'nr_cpus=' support on ppc64 yet.

> 
> If yes, something needs to be fixed, such as, what this patchset is
> doing.
> 
> > 
> > Please cc kexec mailing list when posting so that people can view the
> > whole thread of discussion.
> 
> Already Cc kexe & arm/powerpc & irq list.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Ming
> 


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11  7:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-08  2:02 [PATCH 0/2] blk-mq & nvme-pci: fix io failure in kdump kernel Ming Lei
2023-07-08  2:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] blk-mq: add blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() Ming Lei
2023-07-08  2:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme-pci: use blk_mq_max_nr_hw_queues() to calculate io queues Ming Lei
2023-07-10  6:41   ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-07-10  9:14     ` Ming Lei
2023-07-10  9:14       ` Ming Lei
2023-07-10  9:14       ` Ming Lei
2023-07-10  9:14       ` Ming Lei
2023-07-10 16:51       ` Keith Busch
2023-07-10 16:51         ` Keith Busch
2023-07-10 16:51         ` Keith Busch
2023-07-10 16:51         ` Keith Busch
2023-07-11  1:33         ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  1:33           ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  1:33           ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  1:33           ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  3:35       ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  3:35         ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  3:35         ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  3:35         ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  3:53         ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  3:53           ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  3:53           ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  3:53           ` Ming Lei
2023-07-11  6:59           ` Baoquan He [this message]
2023-07-11  6:59             ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  6:59             ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  6:59             ` Baoquan He
2023-07-11  3:55       ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  3:55         ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  3:55         ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  3:55         ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  4:05       ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  4:05         ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  4:05         ` Pingfan Liu
2023-07-11  4:05         ` Pingfan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZKz912KyFQ7q9qwL@MiWiFi-R3L-srv \
    --to=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wenxiong@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.