From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: Faith Ekstrand <faith@gfxstrand.net>
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/sched: Don't pass user flags to drm_syncobj_find_fence()
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 03:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNGVkNiQhxVioAzP@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807234210.175968-1-faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:41:44PM -0500, Faith Ekstrand wrote:
> The flags field in drm_syncobj_find_fence() takes SYNCOBJ_WAIT flags
> from the syncobj UAPI whereas sync->flags is from the nouveau UAPI. What
> we actually want is 0 flags which tells it to just try to find the
> fence and then return without waiting.
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
> Fixes: b88baab82871 ("drm/nouveau: implement new VM_BIND uAPI")
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
> index b3b59fbec291..3424a1bf6af3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ sync_find_fence(struct nouveau_job *job,
>
> ret = drm_syncobj_find_fence(job->file_priv,
> sync->handle, point,
> - sync->flags, fence);
> + 0 /* flags */, fence);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
To: Faith Ekstrand <faith@gfxstrand.net>
Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/sched: Don't pass user flags to drm_syncobj_find_fence()
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 03:08:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZNGVkNiQhxVioAzP@cassiopeiae> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230807234210.175968-1-faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 06:41:44PM -0500, Faith Ekstrand wrote:
> The flags field in drm_syncobj_find_fence() takes SYNCOBJ_WAIT flags
> from the syncobj UAPI whereas sync->flags is from the nouveau UAPI. What
> we actually want is 0 flags which tells it to just try to find the
> fence and then return without waiting.
Good catch!
Reviewed-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Faith Ekstrand <faith.ekstrand@collabora.com>
> Fixes: b88baab82871 ("drm/nouveau: implement new VM_BIND uAPI")
> Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
> index b3b59fbec291..3424a1bf6af3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ sync_find_fence(struct nouveau_job *job,
>
> ret = drm_syncobj_find_fence(job->file_priv,
> sync->handle, point,
> - sync->flags, fence);
> + 0 /* flags */, fence);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-08 1:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-07 23:41 [Nouveau] [PATCH] drm/nouveau/sched: Don't pass user flags to drm_syncobj_find_fence() Faith Ekstrand
2023-08-07 23:41 ` Faith Ekstrand
2023-08-08 1:08 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2023-08-08 1:08 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZNGVkNiQhxVioAzP@cassiopeiae \
--to=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=faith.ekstrand@collabora.com \
--cc=faith@gfxstrand.net \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.