All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Lakshmi Yadlapati <lakshmiy@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux@roeck-us.net, sumit.semwal@linaro.org,
	christian.koenig@amd.com, jdelvare@suse.com, joel@jms.id.au,
	andrew@aj.id.au, eajames@linux.ibm.com, ninad@linux.ibm.com,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus/max31785) Add minimum delay between bus accesses
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:31:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSUaDIfWmEn5edrE@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009211420.3454026-1-lakshmiy@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 693 bytes --]

Hi,

thanks for this series!

> Reference to Andrew's previous proposal:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200914122811.3295678-1-andrew@aj.id.au/

I do totally agree with Guenter's comment[1], though. This just affects
a few drivers and this patch is way too intrusive for the I2C core. The
later suggested prepare_device() callback[2] sounds better to me. I
still haven't fully understood why this all cannot be handled in the
driver's probe. Could someone give me a small summary about that?

All the best,

   Wolfram


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/e7a64983-fe1d-1ba2-b0c3-ae4a791f7a75@roeck-us.net/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/120342ec-f44a-4550-8c54-45b97db41024@www.fastmail.com/


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Lakshmi Yadlapati <lakshmiy@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, andrew@aj.id.au,
	eajames@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, christian.koenig@amd.com,
	ninad@linux.ibm.com, joel@jms.id.au, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
	sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linux@roeck-us.net,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus/max31785) Add minimum delay between bus accesses
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:31:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZSUaDIfWmEn5edrE@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009211420.3454026-1-lakshmiy@us.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 693 bytes --]

Hi,

thanks for this series!

> Reference to Andrew's previous proposal:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200914122811.3295678-1-andrew@aj.id.au/

I do totally agree with Guenter's comment[1], though. This just affects
a few drivers and this patch is way too intrusive for the I2C core. The
later suggested prepare_device() callback[2] sounds better to me. I
still haven't fully understood why this all cannot be handled in the
driver's probe. Could someone give me a small summary about that?

All the best,

   Wolfram


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/e7a64983-fe1d-1ba2-b0c3-ae4a791f7a75@roeck-us.net/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/120342ec-f44a-4550-8c54-45b97db41024@www.fastmail.com/


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-10-10  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09 21:14 [PATCH v1 0/2] [PATCH] hwmon: (pmbus/max31785) Add minimum delay between bus accesses Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-09 21:14 ` Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-09 21:14 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: smbus: Allow throttling of transfers to client devices Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-09 21:14   ` Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-12 14:18   ` Jean Delvare
2023-10-12 14:18     ` Jean Delvare
2023-10-12 15:08     ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-12 15:08       ` Jani Nikula
2023-10-09 21:14 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/max31785) Add minimum delay between bus accesses Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-09 21:14   ` Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-09 22:10 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] [PATCH] " Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-09 22:10   ` Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-10  9:31 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2023-10-10  9:31   ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-10 13:45   ` Guenter Roeck
2023-10-10 18:58     ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-10 18:58       ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-10 22:59       ` Guenter Roeck
2023-10-11  3:54         ` Andrew Jeffery
2023-10-11 16:14           ` Lakshmi Yadlapati
2023-10-11 16:27         ` Wolfram Sang
2023-10-11 16:27           ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZSUaDIfWmEn5edrE@shikoro \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@aj.id.au \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=eajames@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=lakshmiy@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=ninad@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.