* [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-13 22:33 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-10-13 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton, Zenghui Yu
DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
running NV.
Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
// DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
@@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
+ { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
EL2_REG(FAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
EL2_REG(HPFAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
--
2.34.1
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
2023-10-13 22:33 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-10-14 3:32 ` Oliver Upton
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2023-10-14 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose,
Zenghui Yu
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:33:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> running NV.
>
> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
If you intend to send this as a fix for 6.6:
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Otherwise it is on the stack of patches I'll pick up for 6.7
--
Thanks,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-14 3:32 ` Oliver Upton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2023-10-14 3:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose,
Zenghui Yu
On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:33:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> running NV.
>
> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
If you intend to send this as a fix for 6.6:
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Otherwise it is on the stack of patches I'll pick up for 6.7
--
Thanks,
Oliver
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
2023-10-14 3:32 ` Oliver Upton
@ 2023-10-17 18:50 ` Marc Zyngier
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-10-17 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Upton
Cc: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose,
Zenghui Yu
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 04:32:46 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:33:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> > UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> > running NV.
> >
> > Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> > unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> If you intend to send this as a fix for 6.6:
>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
>
> Otherwise it is on the stack of patches I'll pick up for 6.7
Thanks.
I've queued it as a fix for now, together with Miguel's NV fix
series.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-17 18:50 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-10-17 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Upton
Cc: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose,
Zenghui Yu
On Sat, 14 Oct 2023 04:32:46 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 11:33:11PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> > UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> > running NV.
> >
> > Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> > unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
> If you intend to send this as a fix for 6.6:
>
> Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
>
> Otherwise it is on the stack of patches I'll pick up for 6.7
Thanks.
I've queued it as a fix for now, together with Miguel's NV fix
series.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
2023-10-13 22:33 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-10-16 14:15 ` Miguel Luis
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Luis @ 2023-10-16 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton,
Zenghui Yu
Hi Marc,
> On 13 Oct 2023, at 22:33, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> running NV.
>
> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>
> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>
Should SDER32_EL2 be considered to this same list?
Thanks,
Miguel
> EL2_REG(FAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HPFAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-16 14:15 ` Miguel Luis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Luis @ 2023-10-16 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton,
Zenghui Yu
Hi Marc,
> On 13 Oct 2023, at 22:33, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> running NV.
>
> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>
> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>
Should SDER32_EL2 be considered to this same list?
Thanks,
Miguel
> EL2_REG(FAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HPFAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
2023-10-16 14:15 ` Miguel Luis
@ 2023-10-16 14:28 ` Marc Zyngier
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-10-16 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Luis
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton,
Zenghui Yu
On 16 October 2023 15:15:02 BST, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com> wrote:
>Hi Marc,
>
>> On 13 Oct 2023, at 22:33, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
>> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
>> running NV.
>>
>> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
>> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>>
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>>
>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>>
>> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>>
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>>
>
>Should SDER32_EL2 be considered to this same list?
>
This wouldn't make much sense.
This register is only available when running in secure mode, and KVM is firmly non-secure.
Thanks,
M.
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-16 14:28 ` Marc Zyngier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marc Zyngier @ 2023-10-16 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Miguel Luis
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton,
Zenghui Yu
On 16 October 2023 15:15:02 BST, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com> wrote:
>Hi Marc,
>
>> On 13 Oct 2023, at 22:33, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
>> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
>> running NV.
>>
>> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
>> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>>
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>>
>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>>
>> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>>
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>>
>
>Should SDER32_EL2 be considered to this same list?
>
This wouldn't make much sense.
This register is only available when running in secure mode, and KVM is firmly non-secure.
Thanks,
M.
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
2023-10-16 14:28 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-10-16 15:01 ` Miguel Luis
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Luis @ 2023-10-16 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton,
Zenghui Yu
Hi Marc,
> On 16 Oct 2023, at 14:28, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16 October 2023 15:15:02 BST, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>>> On 13 Oct 2023, at 22:33, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
>>> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
>>> running NV.
>>>
>>> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
>>> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>>> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>>> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>>> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
>>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>>>
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>>>
>>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>>>
>>> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>>> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>>
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>>> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>>>
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>>> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>>>
>>
>> Should SDER32_EL2 be considered to this same list?
>>
>
> This wouldn't make much sense.
>
> This register is only available when running in secure mode, and KVM is firmly non-secure.
>
Thanks for clarifying.
Miguel
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-16 15:01 ` Miguel Luis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Luis @ 2023-10-16 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton,
Zenghui Yu
Hi Marc,
> On 16 Oct 2023, at 14:28, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 16 October 2023 15:15:02 BST, Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@oracle.com> wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>>> On 13 Oct 2023, at 22:33, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
>>> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
>>> running NV.
>>>
>>> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
>>> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>>> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
>>> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>>> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
>>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>>>
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>>>
>>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>>>
>>> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
>>> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>>
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
>>> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>>>
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
>>> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>>> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>>> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>>>
>>
>> Should SDER32_EL2 be considered to this same list?
>>
>
> This wouldn't make much sense.
>
> This register is only available when running in secure mode, and KVM is firmly non-secure.
>
Thanks for clarifying.
Miguel
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
2023-10-13 22:33 ` Marc Zyngier
@ 2023-10-16 14:58 ` Eric Auger
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Eric Auger @ 2023-10-16 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton, Zenghui Yu
Hi Marc,
On 10/14/23 00:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> running NV.
>
> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Eric
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>
> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>
> EL2_REG(FAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HPFAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Do not let a L1 hypervisor access the *32_EL2 sysregs
@ 2023-10-16 14:58 ` Eric Auger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Eric Auger @ 2023-10-16 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc Zyngier, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, kvm
Cc: James Morse, Suzuki K Poulose, Oliver Upton, Zenghui Yu
Hi Marc,
On 10/14/23 00:33, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> DBGVCR32_EL2, DACR32_EL2, IFSR32_EL2 and FPEXC32_EL2 are required to
> UNDEF when AArch32 isn't implemented, which is definitely the case when
> running NV.
>
> Given that this is the only case where these registers can trap,
> unconditionally inject an UNDEF exception.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
Eric
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index 0afd6136e275..0071ccccaf00 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -1961,7 +1961,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> // DBGDTR[TR]X_EL0 share the same encoding
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGDTRTX_EL0), trap_raz_wi },
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DBGVCR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, DBGVCR32_EL2, 0 },
>
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_MPIDR_EL1), NULL, reset_mpidr, MPIDR_EL1 },
>
> @@ -2380,18 +2380,18 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> EL2_REG(VTTBR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(VTCR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_DACR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, DACR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(HDFGRTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HDFGWTR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(SPSR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ELR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> { SYS_DESC(SYS_SP_EL1), access_sp_el1},
>
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), NULL, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_IFSR32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_unknown, IFSR32_EL2 },
> EL2_REG(AFSR0_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(AFSR1_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(ESR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> - { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), NULL, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
> + { SYS_DESC(SYS_FPEXC32_EL2), trap_undef, reset_val, FPEXC32_EL2, 0x700 },
>
> EL2_REG(FAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
> EL2_REG(HPFAR_EL2, access_rw, reset_val, 0),
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread