From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Cc: <cristian.marussi@arm.com>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<quic_asartor@quicinc.com>, <quic_lingutla@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix freq/power truncation in the perf protocol
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:05:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWh6cuApg-sRbA2s@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:27:47PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Fix frequency and power truncation seen in the performance protocol by
> casting it with the correct type.
>
While I always remembered to handle this when reviewing the spec, seem to
have forgotten when it came to handling in the implementation :(. Thanks
for spotting this.
However I don't like the ugly type casting. I think we can do better. Also
looking at the code around the recently added level index mode, I think we
can simplify things like below patch.
Cristian,
What do you think ?
Regards,
Sudeep
-->8
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index a648521e04a3..2e828b29efab 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -268,13 +268,14 @@ scmi_perf_domain_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
dom_info->sustained_perf_level =
le32_to_cpu(attr->sustained_perf_level);
if (!dom_info->sustained_freq_khz ||
- !dom_info->sustained_perf_level)
+ !dom_info->sustained_perf_level ||
+ dom_info->level_indexing_mode)
/* CPUFreq converts to kHz, hence default 1000 */
dom_info->mult_factor = 1000;
else
dom_info->mult_factor =
- (dom_info->sustained_freq_khz * 1000) /
- dom_info->sustained_perf_level;
+ (dom_info->sustained_freq_khz * 1000UL)
+ / dom_info->sustained_perf_level;
strscpy(dom_info->info.name, attr->name,
SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE);
}
@@ -804,9 +805,10 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_device_opps_add(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
for (idx = 0; idx < dom->opp_count; idx++) {
if (!dom->level_indexing_mode)
- freq = dom->opp[idx].perf * dom->mult_factor;
+ freq = dom->opp[idx].perf;
else
- freq = dom->opp[idx].indicative_freq * 1000;
+ freq = dom->opp[idx].indicative_freq;
+ freq *= dom->mult_factor;
data.level = dom->opp[idx].perf;
data.freq = freq;
@@ -879,7 +881,7 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_freq_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
return ret;
if (!dom->level_indexing_mode) {
- *freq = level * dom->mult_factor;
+ *freq = level;
} else {
struct scmi_opp *opp;
@@ -887,8 +889,9 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_freq_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
if (!opp)
return -EIO;
- *freq = opp->indicative_freq * 1000;
+ *freq = opp->indicative_freq;
}
+ freq *= dom->mult_factor;
return ret;
}
@@ -908,9 +911,10 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_est_power_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
for (opp = dom->opp, idx = 0; idx < dom->opp_count; idx++, opp++) {
if (!dom->level_indexing_mode)
- opp_freq = opp->perf * dom->mult_factor;
+ opp_freq = opp->perf;
else
- opp_freq = opp->indicative_freq * 1000;
+ opp_freq = opp->indicative_freq;
+ opp_freq *= dom->mult_factor;
if (opp_freq < *freq)
continue;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Sibi Sankar <quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
Cc: <cristian.marussi@arm.com>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<quic_asartor@quicinc.com>, <quic_lingutla@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix freq/power truncation in the perf protocol
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 12:05:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZWh6cuApg-sRbA2s@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231129065748.19871-3-quic_sibis@quicinc.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 12:27:47PM +0530, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Fix frequency and power truncation seen in the performance protocol by
> casting it with the correct type.
>
While I always remembered to handle this when reviewing the spec, seem to
have forgotten when it came to handling in the implementation :(. Thanks
for spotting this.
However I don't like the ugly type casting. I think we can do better. Also
looking at the code around the recently added level index mode, I think we
can simplify things like below patch.
Cristian,
What do you think ?
Regards,
Sudeep
-->8
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
index a648521e04a3..2e828b29efab 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
@@ -268,13 +268,14 @@ scmi_perf_domain_attributes_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
dom_info->sustained_perf_level =
le32_to_cpu(attr->sustained_perf_level);
if (!dom_info->sustained_freq_khz ||
- !dom_info->sustained_perf_level)
+ !dom_info->sustained_perf_level ||
+ dom_info->level_indexing_mode)
/* CPUFreq converts to kHz, hence default 1000 */
dom_info->mult_factor = 1000;
else
dom_info->mult_factor =
- (dom_info->sustained_freq_khz * 1000) /
- dom_info->sustained_perf_level;
+ (dom_info->sustained_freq_khz * 1000UL)
+ / dom_info->sustained_perf_level;
strscpy(dom_info->info.name, attr->name,
SCMI_SHORT_NAME_MAX_SIZE);
}
@@ -804,9 +805,10 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_device_opps_add(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
for (idx = 0; idx < dom->opp_count; idx++) {
if (!dom->level_indexing_mode)
- freq = dom->opp[idx].perf * dom->mult_factor;
+ freq = dom->opp[idx].perf;
else
- freq = dom->opp[idx].indicative_freq * 1000;
+ freq = dom->opp[idx].indicative_freq;
+ freq *= dom->mult_factor;
data.level = dom->opp[idx].perf;
data.freq = freq;
@@ -879,7 +881,7 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_freq_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
return ret;
if (!dom->level_indexing_mode) {
- *freq = level * dom->mult_factor;
+ *freq = level;
} else {
struct scmi_opp *opp;
@@ -887,8 +889,9 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_freq_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph, u32 domain,
if (!opp)
return -EIO;
- *freq = opp->indicative_freq * 1000;
+ *freq = opp->indicative_freq;
}
+ freq *= dom->mult_factor;
return ret;
}
@@ -908,9 +911,10 @@ static int scmi_dvfs_est_power_get(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
for (opp = dom->opp, idx = 0; idx < dom->opp_count; idx++, opp++) {
if (!dom->level_indexing_mode)
- opp_freq = opp->perf * dom->mult_factor;
+ opp_freq = opp->perf;
else
- opp_freq = opp->indicative_freq * 1000;
+ opp_freq = opp->indicative_freq;
+ opp_freq *= dom->mult_factor;
if (opp_freq < *freq)
continue;
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-30 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-29 6:57 [PATCH 0/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Miscellaneous fixes and opp count increase Sibi Sankar
2023-11-29 6:57 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-29 6:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix null pointer dereference during fastchannel init Sibi Sankar
2023-11-29 6:57 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-30 12:36 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 12:36 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-29 6:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix freq/power truncation in the perf protocol Sibi Sankar
2023-11-29 6:57 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-30 12:05 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2023-11-30 12:05 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-30 12:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 12:49 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 13:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-30 13:56 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-30 16:25 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 16:25 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 19:32 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-30 19:32 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-30 20:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-30 20:14 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-30 19:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-30 19:51 ` Sudeep Holla
2023-11-29 6:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Increase the maximum opp count Sibi Sankar
2023-11-29 6:57 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-30 13:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 13:00 ` Cristian Marussi
2023-11-30 19:16 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-11-30 19:16 ` Sibi Sankar
2023-12-04 13:55 ` (subset) [PATCH 0/3] firmware: arm_scmi: Miscellaneous fixes and opp count increase Sudeep Holla
2023-12-04 13:55 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZWh6cuApg-sRbA2s@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_asartor@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_lingutla@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_mdtipton@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_sibis@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.