Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: scmi: add blocklist

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: scmi: add blocklist
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:46:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl3JPF1rF2JOal8I@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240521-pinctrl-scmi-imx95-v1-2-9a1175d735fd@nxp.com>

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 02:25:58PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> 
> i.MX95 will have its own pinctrl scmi driver, so need block
> pinctrl-scmi driver for i.MX95, otherwise there will be two pinctrl
> devices for a single scmi protocol@19.
>

I am not happy with NXP's we will use SCMI but in our own custom way.
So take one last change to crib about it and hence reluctantly,

Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep