Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property

From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with fsl,pins property
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:54:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zl3LKRE-PT3u1AX7@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DU0PR04MB941718F15619A907C15AA18588F02@DU0PR04MB9417.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:36:27AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Linus, Sudeep, Cristian,
> 
> > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: scmi: support i.MX95 OEM extensions with
> > fsl,pins property
> 
> Sorry if this is an early ping to you. Just wanna this not blocking i.MX95
> upstream support.
>

I would say yes as this was posted bang in the middle of the merge window.
So it is possible for people to miss this if they are busy otherwise.

I wouldn't have responded in general or if someone is new to the Linux
kernel development. But you are no new to kernel development.

In general I also have a suggestion for you. Avoid churning the dependent
patch series if the base set of patches are not yet reviewed or agreed upon.
I was super confused with the amount of different concurrent but dependent
patch series you had for this whole i.MX SCMI pinmux support. I had ignored
and not responded in the past but thought it would be good to respond in
this thread.

--
Regards,
Sudeep