All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
	George Dunlap <gwd@xenproject.org>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
	Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	"Daniel P . Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>,
	Stewart Hildebrand <Stewart.Hildebrand@amd.com>,
	Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH v12 1/7] xen/pci: Add hypercall to support reset of pcidev
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 17:55:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqpeiWhuqPXiTeRZ@macbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240708114124.407797-2-Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>

On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 07:41:18PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> When a device has been reset on dom0 side, the Xen hypervisor
> doesn't get notification, so the cached state in vpci is all
> out of date compare with the real device state.
> 
> To solve that problem, add a new hypercall to support the reset
> of pcidev and clear the vpci state of device. So that once the
> state of device is reset on dom0 side, dom0 can call this
> hypercall to notify hypervisor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>

Thanks, just a couple of nits.

This is missing a changelog between versions, and I haven't been
following all the versions, so some of my questions might have been
answered in previous revisions.

> ---
>  xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c |  1 +
>  xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c    | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c      | 10 +++++++
>  xen/include/public/physdev.h | 16 +++++++++++
>  xen/include/xen/vpci.h       |  8 ++++++
>  5 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
> index 7fb3136f0c7c..0fab670a4871 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ long hvm_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>      case PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved:
>      case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add:
>      case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove:
> +    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_state_reset:
>      case PHYSDEVOP_dbgp_op:
>          if ( !is_hardware_domain(currd) )
>              return -ENOSYS;
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
> index 42db3e6d133c..c0f47945d955 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>  #include <xen/guest_access.h>
>  #include <xen/hypercall.h>
>  #include <xen/init.h>
> +#include <xen/vpci.h>
>  
>  #ifndef COMPAT
>  typedef long ret_t;
> @@ -67,6 +68,57 @@ ret_t pci_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
>          break;
>      }
>  
> +    case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_state_reset:
> +    {
> +        struct pci_device_state_reset dev_reset;
> +        struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +        pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> +
> +        ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +        if ( !is_pci_passthrough_enabled() )
> +            break;
> +
> +        ret = -EFAULT;
> +        if ( copy_from_guest(&dev_reset, arg, 1) != 0 )
> +            break;
> +
> +        sbdf = PCI_SBDF(dev_reset.dev.seg,
> +                        dev_reset.dev.bus,
> +                        dev_reset.dev.devfn);
> +
> +        ret = xsm_resource_setup_pci(XSM_PRIV, sbdf.sbdf);
> +        if ( ret )
> +            break;
> +
> +        pcidevs_lock();
> +        pdev = pci_get_pdev(NULL, sbdf);
> +        if ( !pdev )
> +        {
> +            pcidevs_unlock();
> +            ret = -ENODEV;
> +            break;
> +        }
> +
> +        write_lock(&pdev->domain->pci_lock);
> +        pcidevs_unlock();
> +        switch ( dev_reset.reset_type )
> +        {
> +        case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD:
> +        case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM:
> +        case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT:
> +        case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR:
> +            ret = vpci_reset_device_state(pdev, dev_reset.reset_type);
> +            break;
> +
> +        default:
> +            ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +            break;
> +        }
> +        write_unlock(&pdev->domain->pci_lock);
> +
> +        break;
> +    }
> +
>      default:
>          ret = -ENOSYS;
>          break;
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> index 1e6aa5d799b9..7e914d1eff9f 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> @@ -172,6 +172,16 @@ int vpci_assign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>      return rc;
>  }
> +
> +int vpci_reset_device_state(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +                            uint32_t reset_type)

There's probably no use in passing reset_type to
vpci_reset_device_state() if it's ignored?

> +{
> +    ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(&pdev->domain->pci_lock));
> +
> +    vpci_deassign_device(pdev);
> +    return vpci_assign_device(pdev);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __XEN__ */
>  
>  static int vpci_register_cmp(const struct vpci_register *r1,
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/physdev.h b/xen/include/public/physdev.h
> index f0c0d4727c0b..3cfde3fd2389 100644
> --- a/xen/include/public/physdev.h
> +++ b/xen/include/public/physdev.h
> @@ -296,6 +296,13 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(physdev_pci_device_add_t);
>   */
>  #define PHYSDEVOP_prepare_msix          30
>  #define PHYSDEVOP_release_msix          31
> +/*
> + * Notify the hypervisor that a PCI device has been reset, so that any
> + * internally cached state is regenerated.  Should be called after any
> + * device reset performed by the hardware domain.
> + */
> +#define PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_state_reset 32
> +
>  struct physdev_pci_device {
>      /* IN */
>      uint16_t seg;
> @@ -305,6 +312,15 @@ struct physdev_pci_device {
>  typedef struct physdev_pci_device physdev_pci_device_t;
>  DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(physdev_pci_device_t);
>  
> +struct pci_device_state_reset {
> +    physdev_pci_device_t dev;
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD 0
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM 1
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT  2
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR  3
> +    uint32_t reset_type;

This might want to be a flags field, with the low 2 bits (or maybe 3
bits to cope if more rest modes are added in the future) being used to
signal the reset type.  We can always do that later if flags need to
be added.

Seeing as reset_type has no impact on the hypercall, I would like to
ask for some reasoning for it's presence to be added to the commit
message, otherwise it feels like pointless code churn.

> +};
> +
>  #define PHYSDEVOP_DBGP_RESET_PREPARE    1
>  #define PHYSDEVOP_DBGP_RESET_DONE       2
>  
> diff --git a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> index da8d0f41e6f4..6be812dbc04a 100644
> --- a/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xen/vpci.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ int __must_check vpci_assign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
>  
>  /* Remove all handlers and free vpci related structures. */
>  void vpci_deassign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev);
> +int __must_check vpci_reset_device_state(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +                                         uint32_t reset_type);
>  
>  /* Add/remove a register handler. */
>  int __must_check vpci_add_register_mask(struct vpci *vpci,
> @@ -282,6 +284,12 @@ static inline int vpci_assign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>  static inline void vpci_deassign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
>  
> +static inline int __must_check vpci_reset_device_state(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> +                                                       uint32_t reset_type)
> +{
> +    return 0;
> +}
> +

Maybe it turns out to be more complicated than the current approach,
but vpci_reset_device_state() could be an static inline function in
vpci.h defined regardless of whether CONFIG_HAS_VPCI is selected or
not, as the underlying functions vpci_{de}assign_device() are always
defined.

Thanks, Roger.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-31 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-08 11:41 [XEN PATCH v12 0/7] Support device passthrough when dom0 is PVH on Xen Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 1/7] xen/pci: Add hypercall to support reset of pcidev Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 14:56   ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-09  2:47     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-09  6:01       ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 15:55   ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2024-07-31 15:58     ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 16:13       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-01  6:49         ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02  2:56           ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  2:55     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  6:25       ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02  7:41         ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  7:43           ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02  7:44         ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 2/7] x86/pvh: Allow (un)map_pirq when dom0 is PVH Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 14:58   ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-22 21:37   ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-07-30 13:09   ` Andrew Cooper
2024-07-31  1:47     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-31  8:31     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-31  8:42       ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31  7:50   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31  7:58     ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31  8:24       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31  8:40         ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31  8:51           ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31  9:02             ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31  9:37               ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31  9:55                 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 11:29                   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 11:39                     ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 13:03                       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02  2:37                         ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  8:11                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02  8:17                             ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  8:35                               ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02  8:40                                 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  9:17                                   ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02  9:37                             ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31  8:39     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 3/7] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0 Jiqian Chen
2024-07-10  8:01   ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-11  7:58   ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-22 21:38   ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 4/7] x86/domctl: Add hypercall to set the access of x86 gsi Jiqian Chen
2024-07-09 13:08   ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-26  6:55     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-22 22:10   ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-07-26  6:53     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-26 20:16       ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-08-01 11:06   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-01 11:36     ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-01 12:41       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-01 13:11         ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02  3:10     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  6:27       ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02  7:44         ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  7:59       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02  8:08   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02  8:23     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02  9:40     ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 12:05       ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 5/7] tools/libxc: Allow gsi be mapped into a free pirq Jiqian Chen
2024-07-09 13:26   ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-10  7:55     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-01 12:55     ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [RFC XEN PATCH v12 6/7] tools: Add new function to get gsi from dev Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 13:27   ` Anthony PERARD
2024-07-09  3:35     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-29 16:30       ` Anthony PERARD
2024-08-01 13:01   ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02  3:13     ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [RFC XEN PATCH v12 7/7] tools: Add new function to do PIRQ (un)map on PVH dom0 Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 14:57   ` Anthony PERARD
2024-07-09  6:18     ` Chen, Jiqian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZqpeiWhuqPXiTeRZ@macbook \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=Jiqian.Chen@amd.com \
    --cc=Stewart.Hildebrand@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=anthony@xenproject.org \
    --cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
    --cc=gwd@xenproject.org \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=julien@xen.org \
    --cc=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.