From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>,
George Dunlap <gwd@xenproject.org>, Julien Grall <julien@xen.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Anthony PERARD <anthony@xenproject.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Daniel P . Smith" <dpsmith@apertussolutions.com>,
"Hildebrand, Stewart" <Stewart.Hildebrand@amd.com>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [XEN PATCH v12 1/7] xen/pci: Add hypercall to support reset of pcidev
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 09:44:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqyOSrx8aHXh1OKn@macbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ca7e6a2-698d-4548-9959-fd88126c25e1@suse.com>
On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 08:25:58AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 02.08.2024 04:55, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> > On 2024/7/31 23:55, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 07:41:18PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> >>> When a device has been reset on dom0 side, the Xen hypervisor
> >>> doesn't get notification, so the cached state in vpci is all
> >>> out of date compare with the real device state.
> >>>
> >>> To solve that problem, add a new hypercall to support the reset
> >>> of pcidev and clear the vpci state of device. So that once the
> >>> state of device is reset on dom0 side, dom0 can call this
> >>> hypercall to notify hypervisor.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jiqian Chen <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Stewart Hildebrand <stewart.hildebrand@amd.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> Thanks, just a couple of nits.
> >>
> >> This is missing a changelog between versions, and I haven't been
> >> following all the versions, so some of my questions might have been
> >> answered in previous revisions.
> > Sorry, I will add changelogs here in next version.
> >
> >>
> >>> ---
> >>> xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c | 1 +
> >>> xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c | 10 +++++++
> >>> xen/include/public/physdev.h | 16 +++++++++++
> >>> xen/include/xen/vpci.h | 8 ++++++
> >>> 5 files changed, 87 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
> >>> index 7fb3136f0c7c..0fab670a4871 100644
> >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hypercall.c
> >>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ long hvm_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> >>> case PHYSDEVOP_pci_mmcfg_reserved:
> >>> case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_add:
> >>> case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_remove:
> >>> + case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_state_reset:
> >>> case PHYSDEVOP_dbgp_op:
> >>> if ( !is_hardware_domain(currd) )
> >>> return -ENOSYS;
> >>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
> >>> index 42db3e6d133c..c0f47945d955 100644
> >>> --- a/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/drivers/pci/physdev.c
> >>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> >>> #include <xen/guest_access.h>
> >>> #include <xen/hypercall.h>
> >>> #include <xen/init.h>
> >>> +#include <xen/vpci.h>
> >>>
> >>> #ifndef COMPAT
> >>> typedef long ret_t;
> >>> @@ -67,6 +68,57 @@ ret_t pci_physdev_op(int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> >>> break;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + case PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_state_reset:
> >>> + {
> >>> + struct pci_device_state_reset dev_reset;
> >>> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> >>> + pci_sbdf_t sbdf;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> + if ( !is_pci_passthrough_enabled() )
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = -EFAULT;
> >>> + if ( copy_from_guest(&dev_reset, arg, 1) != 0 )
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + sbdf = PCI_SBDF(dev_reset.dev.seg,
> >>> + dev_reset.dev.bus,
> >>> + dev_reset.dev.devfn);
> >>> +
> >>> + ret = xsm_resource_setup_pci(XSM_PRIV, sbdf.sbdf);
> >>> + if ( ret )
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + pcidevs_lock();
> >>> + pdev = pci_get_pdev(NULL, sbdf);
> >>> + if ( !pdev )
> >>> + {
> >>> + pcidevs_unlock();
> >>> + ret = -ENODEV;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> + write_lock(&pdev->domain->pci_lock);
> >>> + pcidevs_unlock();
> >>> + switch ( dev_reset.reset_type )
> >>> + {
> >>> + case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD:
> >>> + case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM:
> >>> + case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT:
> >>> + case PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR:
> >>> + ret = vpci_reset_device_state(pdev, dev_reset.reset_type);
> >>> + break;
> >>> +
> >>> + default:
> >>> + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> + write_unlock(&pdev->domain->pci_lock);
> >>> +
> >>> + break;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> default:
> >>> ret = -ENOSYS;
> >>> break;
> >>> diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> >>> index 1e6aa5d799b9..7e914d1eff9f 100644
> >>> --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> >>> +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/vpci.c
> >>> @@ -172,6 +172,16 @@ int vpci_assign_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >>>
> >>> return rc;
> >>> }
> >>> +
> >>> +int vpci_reset_device_state(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> >>> + uint32_t reset_type)
> >>
> >> There's probably no use in passing reset_type to
> >> vpci_reset_device_state() if it's ignored?
> >>
> >>> +{
> >>> + ASSERT(rw_is_write_locked(&pdev->domain->pci_lock));
> >>> +
> >>> + vpci_deassign_device(pdev);
> >>> + return vpci_assign_device(pdev);
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> #endif /* __XEN__ */
> >>>
> >>> static int vpci_register_cmp(const struct vpci_register *r1,
> >>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/physdev.h b/xen/include/public/physdev.h
> >>> index f0c0d4727c0b..3cfde3fd2389 100644
> >>> --- a/xen/include/public/physdev.h
> >>> +++ b/xen/include/public/physdev.h
> >>> @@ -296,6 +296,13 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(physdev_pci_device_add_t);
> >>> */
> >>> #define PHYSDEVOP_prepare_msix 30
> >>> #define PHYSDEVOP_release_msix 31
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Notify the hypervisor that a PCI device has been reset, so that any
> >>> + * internally cached state is regenerated. Should be called after any
> >>> + * device reset performed by the hardware domain.
> >>> + */
> >>> +#define PHYSDEVOP_pci_device_state_reset 32
> >>> +
> >>> struct physdev_pci_device {
> >>> /* IN */
> >>> uint16_t seg;
> >>> @@ -305,6 +312,15 @@ struct physdev_pci_device {
> >>> typedef struct physdev_pci_device physdev_pci_device_t;
> >>> DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(physdev_pci_device_t);
> >>>
> >>> +struct pci_device_state_reset {
> >>> + physdev_pci_device_t dev;
> >>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD 0
> >>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM 1
> >>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT 2
> >>> +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR 3
> >>> + uint32_t reset_type;
> >>
> >> This might want to be a flags field, with the low 2 bits (or maybe 3
> >> bits to cope if more rest modes are added in the future) being used to
> >> signal the reset type. We can always do that later if flags need to
> >> be added.
> > Do you mean this?
> > +struct pci_device_state_reset {
> > + physdev_pci_device_t dev;
> > +#define _PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD 0
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD (1U<<_PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_COLD)
> > +#define _PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM 1
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM (1U<<_PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_WARM)
> > +#define _PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT 2
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT (1U<<_PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_HOT)
> > +#define _PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR 3
> > +#define PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR (1U<<_PCI_DEVICE_STATE_RESET_FLR)
> > + uint32_t reset_type;
> > +};
>
> That's four bits, not two. I'm pretty sure Roger meant to keep the enum-
> like #define-s, but additionally define a 2-bit mask constant (0x3). I
> don't think it needs to be three bits right away - we can decide what to
> do there when any of the higher bits are to be assigned a meaning.
Indeed, what I was requesting is just a cosmetic change, it doesn't
result in the values on the enum changing at all.
The field however should be better named "flags" or something more
generic so in the future it can accommodate other flags not related to
the reset type.
Thanks, Roger.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-08 11:41 [XEN PATCH v12 0/7] Support device passthrough when dom0 is PVH on Xen Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 1/7] xen/pci: Add hypercall to support reset of pcidev Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 14:56 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-09 2:47 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-09 6:01 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 15:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 15:58 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 16:13 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-01 6:49 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 2:56 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 2:55 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 6:25 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 7:41 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 7:43 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 7:44 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 2/7] x86/pvh: Allow (un)map_pirq when dom0 is PVH Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 14:58 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-22 21:37 ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-07-30 13:09 ` Andrew Cooper
2024-07-31 1:47 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-31 8:31 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-31 8:42 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 7:50 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 7:58 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 8:24 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 8:40 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 8:51 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 9:02 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 9:37 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 9:55 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 11:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-31 11:39 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 13:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02 2:37 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 8:11 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02 8:17 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 8:35 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02 8:40 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 9:17 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 9:37 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-31 8:39 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 3/7] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0 Jiqian Chen
2024-07-10 8:01 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-11 7:58 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-22 21:38 ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 4/7] x86/domctl: Add hypercall to set the access of x86 gsi Jiqian Chen
2024-07-09 13:08 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-26 6:55 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-22 22:10 ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-07-26 6:53 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-26 20:16 ` Stefano Stabellini
2024-08-01 11:06 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-01 11:36 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-01 12:41 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-01 13:11 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 3:10 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 6:27 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 7:44 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 7:59 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02 8:08 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02 8:23 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-02 9:40 ` Jan Beulich
2024-08-02 12:05 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [XEN PATCH v12 5/7] tools/libxc: Allow gsi be mapped into a free pirq Jiqian Chen
2024-07-09 13:26 ` Jan Beulich
2024-07-10 7:55 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-08-01 12:55 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [RFC XEN PATCH v12 6/7] tools: Add new function to get gsi from dev Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 13:27 ` Anthony PERARD
2024-07-09 3:35 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-29 16:30 ` Anthony PERARD
2024-08-01 13:01 ` Roger Pau Monné
2024-08-02 3:13 ` Chen, Jiqian
2024-07-08 11:41 ` [RFC XEN PATCH v12 7/7] tools: Add new function to do PIRQ (un)map on PVH dom0 Jiqian Chen
2024-07-08 14:57 ` Anthony PERARD
2024-07-09 6:18 ` Chen, Jiqian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZqyOSrx8aHXh1OKn@macbook \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=Jiqian.Chen@amd.com \
--cc=Ray.Huang@amd.com \
--cc=Stewart.Hildebrand@amd.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=anthony@xenproject.org \
--cc=dpsmith@apertussolutions.com \
--cc=gwd@xenproject.org \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.