From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:03:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuRiTxDN7+UO42H+@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830095147.3538047-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> The new TEE remoteproc driver is used to manage remote firmware in a
> secure, trusted context. The 'st,stm32mp1-m4-tee' compatibility is
> introduced to delegate the loading of the firmware to the trusted
> execution context. In such cases, the firmware should be signed and
> adhere to the image format defined by the TEE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 79c638936163..400a7a93b1c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc_tee.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> @@ -257,6 +258,19 @@ static int stm32_rproc_release(struct rproc *rproc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int stm32_rproc_tee_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(rproc);
> +
> + err = tee_rproc_stop(rproc);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return stm32_rproc_release(rproc);
> +}
> +
> static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> @@ -693,8 +707,20 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> };
>
> +static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_tee_ops = {
> + .prepare = stm32_rproc_prepare,
> + .start = tee_rproc_start,
> + .stop = stm32_rproc_tee_stop,
> + .kick = stm32_rproc_kick,
> + .load = tee_rproc_load_fw,
> + .parse_fw = tee_rproc_parse_fw,
> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id stm32_rproc_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4" },
> + { .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_rproc_match);
> @@ -853,17 +879,42 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct tee_rproc *trproc = NULL;
> struct rproc *rproc;
> unsigned int state;
> + u32 proc_id;
> int ret;
>
> ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
> - if (!rproc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
> + /*
> + * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
> + * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
> + */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
> + if (!rproc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + trproc = tee_rproc_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
> + if (IS_ERR(trproc)) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(trproc),
> + "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(trproc);
> + }
> + } else {
> + rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
> + if (!rproc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> ddata = rproc->priv;
>
> @@ -915,6 +966,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> }
> + if (trproc)
if (rproc->tee_interface)
I am done reviewing this set.
> + tee_rproc_unregister(trproc);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -935,6 +989,9 @@ static void stm32_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> }
> + if (rproc->tee_interface)
> + tee_rproc_unregister(rproc->tee_interface);
> +
> }
>
> static int stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
To: op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2024 10:03:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZuRiTxDN7+UO42H+@p14s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240830095147.3538047-8-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4316 bytes --]
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 11:51:47AM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> The new TEE remoteproc driver is used to manage remote firmware in a
> secure, trusted context. The 'st,stm32mp1-m4-tee' compatibility is
> introduced to delegate the loading of the firmware to the trusted
> execution context. In such cases, the firmware should be signed and
> adhere to the image format defined by the TEE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 79c638936163..400a7a93b1c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> #include <linux/pm_wakeirq.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> +#include <linux/remoteproc_tee.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> @@ -257,6 +258,19 @@ static int stm32_rproc_release(struct rproc *rproc)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int stm32_rproc_tee_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(rproc);
> +
> + err = tee_rproc_stop(rproc);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + return stm32_rproc_release(rproc);
> +}
> +
> static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> @@ -693,8 +707,20 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
> .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> };
>
> +static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_tee_ops = {
> + .prepare = stm32_rproc_prepare,
> + .start = tee_rproc_start,
> + .stop = stm32_rproc_tee_stop,
> + .kick = stm32_rproc_kick,
> + .load = tee_rproc_load_fw,
> + .parse_fw = tee_rproc_parse_fw,
> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = tee_rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id stm32_rproc_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4" },
> + { .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" },
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_rproc_match);
> @@ -853,17 +879,42 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
> struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + struct tee_rproc *trproc = NULL;
> struct rproc *rproc;
> unsigned int state;
> + u32 proc_id;
> int ret;
>
> ret = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
> - if (!rproc)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
> + /*
> + * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
> + * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
> + */
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "st,proc-id", &proc_id);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "failed to read st,rproc-id property\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_tee_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
> + if (!rproc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + trproc = tee_rproc_register(dev, rproc, proc_id);
> + if (IS_ERR(trproc)) {
> + dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(trproc),
> + "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(trproc);
> + }
> + } else {
> + rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
> + if (!rproc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> ddata = rproc->priv;
>
> @@ -915,6 +966,9 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> }
> + if (trproc)
if (rproc->tee_interface)
I am done reviewing this set.
> + tee_rproc_unregister(trproc);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -935,6 +989,9 @@ static void stm32_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(dev);
> device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
> }
> + if (rproc->tee_interface)
> + tee_rproc_unregister(rproc->tee_interface);
> +
> }
>
> static int stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-13 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-30 9:51 [PATCH v9 0/7] Introduction of a remoteproc tee to load signed firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] remoteproc: core: Introduce rproc_pa_to_va helper Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] remoteproc: Add TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-09-11 15:17 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-11 15:17 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-11 15:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-11 15:25 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-13 16:01 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-13 16:01 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] remoteproc: core: Refactor resource table cleanup into rproc_release_fw Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-09-11 15:20 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-11 15:20 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] remoteproc: core: Add TEE interface support for firmware release Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-31 16:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-08-31 16:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-09-02 7:18 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-02 7:18 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-11 15:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-11 15:56 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-12 15:26 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-12 15:26 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-17 16:56 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-17 16:56 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-23 14:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-23 14:53 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-18 14:43 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-18 14:43 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-23 15:13 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-23 15:13 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-26 3:51 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-09-26 3:51 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-09-27 10:01 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-27 10:01 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add compatibility for TEE support Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] remoteproc: stm32: Create sub-functions to request shutdown and release Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-09-12 15:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-12 15:41 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-08-30 9:51 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-08-30 9:51 ` Arnaud Pouliquen
2024-09-13 16:03 ` Mathieu Poirier [this message]
2024-09-13 16:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2024-09-16 14:08 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
2024-09-16 14:08 ` Arnaud POULIQUEN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZuRiTxDN7+UO42H+@p14s \
--to=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.