All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
	suraj.kandpal@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 21:52:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZvG47MoTIBJOO4EV@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240923181336.3303940-11-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 11:43:30PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Pass the current pipe into enabled_joiner_pipes(), and let it figure out
> the proper bitmasks for us.
> 
> v2:
> -Simplify helper get_joiner_primary_pipes. (Ville)
> -Nuke get_joiner_secondary_pipes. (Ville)
> -Add more drm_WARNs and checks for final primary/secondary pipes.
> (Ville)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 85 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index c42ba377d247..f35d1e1fdb8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3706,7 +3706,14 @@ static void enabled_ultrajoiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> +static u8 get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes)
> +{
> +	primary_pipes &= GENMASK(pipe, 0);
> +
> +	return primary_pipes ? BIT(fls(primary_pipes) - 1) : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
>  				 u8 *primary_pipes, u8 *secondary_pipes)
>  {
>  	struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(&dev_priv->drm);
> @@ -3774,41 +3781,47 @@ static void enabled_joiner_pipes(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  		 expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes),
>  		 secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
>  
> -	*primary_pipes = primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | primary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> -			 primary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> -	*secondary_pipes = secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes | secondary_bigjoiner_pipes |
> -			 secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes;
> -}
> -
> -static enum pipe get_joiner_primary_pipe(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> -{
> -	if ((secondary_pipes & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
> -		return pipe;
> -
> -	/* ignore everything above our pipe */
> -	primary_pipes &= ~GENMASK(7, pipe);
> -
> -	/* highest remaining bit should be our primary pipe */
> -	return fls(primary_pipes) - 1;
> -}
> +	*primary_pipes = 0;
> +	*secondary_pipes = 0;
>  
> -static u8 get_joiner_secondary_pipes(enum pipe pipe, u8 primary_pipes, u8 secondary_pipes)
> -{
> -	enum pipe primary_pipe, next_primary_pipe;
> +	if (ultrajoiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> +		*primary_pipes = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
> +		*secondary_pipes = secondary_ultrajoiner_pipes &
> +				   expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_ultrajoiner_pipes);
                                                                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That should be '*primary_pipes'.

This branch is missing the final WARN_ON you have in the
bigjoiner uncompressed joiner branches below.

> +		return;
> +	}
>  
> -	primary_pipe = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> +	if (uncompressed_joiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> +		*primary_pipes = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> +		*secondary_pipes =
> +			secondary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes &
> +			expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(primary_uncompressed_joiner_pipes);
> +	} else if (bigjoiner_pipes & BIT(pipe)) {
> +		*primary_pipes = get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_bigjoiner_pipes);
> +		*secondary_pipes = secondary_bigjoiner_pipes &
> +				   expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(primary_bigjoiner_pipes);

Same '*primary_pipes' thing in these two.

> +	}

I would probably get rid of the if-else construct here, and just
handle each joiner type completely independently, just like ultrajoiner
above. Makes the code more regular and thus easier to reason about.

>  
> -	if ((primary_pipes & BIT(primary_pipe)) == 0)
> -		return 0;
> +	drm_WARN(display->drm,
> +		 expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes,
> +		 "Wrong bigjoiner secondary pipes for primary_pipes %#x (expected %#x, current %#x for)\n",
> +		 *primary_pipes,
> +		 expected_bigjoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes),
> +		 *secondary_pipes);
>  
> -	/* ignore our primary pipe and everything below it */
> -	primary_pipes &= ~GENMASK(primary_pipe, 0);
> -	/* make sure a high bit is set for the ffs() */
> -	primary_pipes |= BIT(7);
> -	/* lowest remaining bit should be the next primary pipe */
> -	next_primary_pipe = ffs(primary_pipes) - 1;
> +	drm_WARN(display->drm,
> +		 expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes,
> +		 "Wrong uncompressed joiner secondary pipes for primary_pipes %#x (expected %#x, current %#x for)\n",
> +		 *primary_pipes,
> +		 expected_uncompressed_joiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes),
> +		 *secondary_pipes);
>  
> -	return secondary_pipes & GENMASK(next_primary_pipe - 1, primary_pipe);
> +	drm_WARN(display->drm,
> +		 expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes) != *secondary_pipes,
> +		 "Wrong ultrajoiner secondary pipes for primary_pipes %#x (expected %#x, current %#x for)\n",
> +		 *primary_pipes,
> +		 expected_ultrajoiner_secondary_pipes(*primary_pipes),
> +		 *secondary_pipes);

I'm not quite sure what's happening here. We already bailed out for
ultrajoiner earlier.

The patch is pretty hard to read. Did you try --patience vs. not when
generating it in case one or the other makes for a more readalbe end
result?

>  }
>  
>  static u8 hsw_panel_transcoders(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> @@ -3880,10 +3893,10 @@ static u8 hsw_enabled_transcoders(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>  		enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
>  
>  	/* joiner secondary -> consider the primary pipe's transcoder as well */
> -	enabled_joiner_pipes(dev_priv, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> +	enabled_joiner_pipes(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
>  	if (secondary_pipes & BIT(crtc->pipe)) {
>  		cpu_transcoder = (enum transcoder)
> -			get_joiner_primary_pipe(crtc->pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> +			ffs(get_joiner_primary_pipe(crtc->pipe, primary_pipes)) - 1;
>  		if (transcoder_ddi_func_is_enabled(dev_priv, cpu_transcoder))
>  			enabled_transcoders |= BIT(cpu_transcoder);
>  	}
> @@ -4017,14 +4030,12 @@ static void intel_joiner_get_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	u8 primary_pipes, secondary_pipes;
>  	enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>  
> -	enabled_joiner_pipes(i915, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
> +	enabled_joiner_pipes(i915, pipe, &primary_pipes, &secondary_pipes);
>  
>  	if (((primary_pipes | secondary_pipes) & BIT(pipe)) == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> -	crtc_state->joiner_pipes =
> -		BIT(get_joiner_primary_pipe(pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes)) |
> -		get_joiner_secondary_pipes(pipe, primary_pipes, secondary_pipes);
> +	crtc_state->joiner_pipes = primary_pipes | secondary_pipes;
>  }
>  
>  static bool hsw_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> -- 
> 2.45.2

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-23 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-23 18:13 [PATCH 00/16] Ultrajoiner basic functionality series Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/display_device: Add Check HAS_DSC for bigjoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:30   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/display_debugfs: Allow force joiner only if supported Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:34   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/display: Modify debugfs for joiner to force n pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:36   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helper to compute num pipes required Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/display: Add debugfs support to avoid joiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:38   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915: Split current joiner hw state readout Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915: Add bigjoiner and uncompressed joiner hw readout sanity checks Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/display: Add macro HAS_ULTRAJOINER() Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:39   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915: Implement hw state readout and checks for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/display: Refactor enable_joiner_pipes Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:52   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/display/vdsc: Add ultrajoiner support with DSC Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:54   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Modify compressed bpp limitations for ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:32   ` Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Modify helper to get slice count " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:04   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915: Compute config and mode valid changes " Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:06   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Consider ultrajoiner for computing maxdotclock Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:08   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-23 18:13 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/intel_dp: Add support for forcing ultrajoiner Ankit Nautiyal
2024-09-23 19:09   ` Ville Syrjälä
2024-09-25 22:13 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Ultrajoiner basic functionality series (rev3) Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:13 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:26 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:29 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:30 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2024-09-25 22:59 ` ✗ CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2024-09-26  2:40 ` ✗ CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZvG47MoTIBJOO4EV@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.