From: Chinmay Rath <rathc@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, shivangu@linux.ibm.com
Cc: milesg@linux.ibm.com, harshpb@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 22/28] target/ppc: Move Fixed-Point Load/Store String instructions to decodetree.
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 14:24:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a1b01852-701d-421d-a72e-0d357f40e16b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520160728.2283628-23-rathc@linux.ibm.com>
On 5/20/26 21:37, Chinmay Rath wrote:
> From: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Move below instructions to decodetree specification :
>
> lsw{i, x},
> stsw{i, x} : X-form
>
> The changes were verified by validating that the tcg ops generated by
> those instructions remain the same, which were captured with the '-d
> in_asm,op' flag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivang Upadhyay <shivangu@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chinmay Rath <rathc@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> target/ppc/helper.h | 6 +-
> target/ppc/insn32.decode | 7 ++
> target/ppc/mem_helper.c | 6 +-
> target/ppc/translate.c | 102 --------------------
> target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/helper.h b/target/ppc/helper.h
> index dacc4e223e..50493a72a5 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/helper.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/helper.h
> @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ DEF_HELPER_1(check_tlb_flush_global, void, env)
>
> DEF_HELPER_3(lmw, void, env, tl, i32)
> DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(stmw, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, i32)
> -DEF_HELPER_4(lsw, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> -DEF_HELPER_5(lswx, void, env, tl, i32, i32, i32)
> -DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(stsw, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_4(LSW, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_5(LSWX, void, env, tl, i32, i32, i32)
> +DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_4(STSW, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, i32, i32)
> DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_3(DCBZ, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl, int)
> #ifdef TARGET_PPC64
> DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_2(DCBZL, TCG_CALL_NO_WG, void, env, tl)
> diff --git a/target/ppc/insn32.decode b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
> index f3a1f7970e..0ec9a4d5de 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/insn32.decode
> +++ b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
> @@ -527,6 +527,13 @@ CREQV 010011 ..... ..... ..... 0100100001 - @X
> CRANDC 010011 ..... ..... ..... 0010000001 - @X
> CRORC 010011 ..... ..... ..... 0110100001 - @X
>
> +# Fixed Point Move Assist Instructions
> +
> +LSWI 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 001010101 - @X
> +LSWX 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 000010101 - @X
> +STSWI 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 011010101 - @X
> +STSWX 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1 010010101 - @X
> +
> # Fixed-Point Hash Instructions
>
> HASHST 011111 ..... ..... ..... 1011010010 . @X_DW
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
> index 5d3d377261..303eec4ee5 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/mem_helper.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static void do_lsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t nb,
> env->gpr[reg] = val;
> }
>
> -void helper_lsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
> +void helper_LSW(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
> uint32_t nb, uint32_t reg)
> {
> do_lsw(env, addr, nb, reg, GETPC());
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ void helper_lsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr,
> * this is valid, but rA won't be loaded. For now, I'll follow the
> * spec...
> */
> -void helper_lswx(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t reg,
> +void helper_LSWX(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t reg,
> uint32_t ra, uint32_t rb)
> {
> if (likely(xer_bc != 0)) {
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void helper_lswx(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t reg,
> }
> }
>
> -void helper_stsw(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t nb,
> +void helper_STSW(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong addr, uint32_t nb,
> uint32_t reg)
> {
> uintptr_t raddr = GETPC();
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
> index 85bdb7deab..fc107399db 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
> @@ -2597,104 +2597,6 @@ static void gen_stmw(DisasContext *ctx)
> gen_helper_stmw(tcg_env, t0, t1);
> }
>
> -/*** Integer load and store strings ***/
> -
> -/* lswi */
> -/*
> - * PowerPC32 specification says we must generate an exception if rA is
> - * in the range of registers to be loaded. In an other hand, IBM says
> - * this is valid, but rA won't be loaded. For now, I'll follow the
> - * spec...
> - */
> -static void gen_lswi(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> - TCGv t0;
> - TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> - int nb = NB(ctx->opcode);
> - int start = rD(ctx->opcode);
> - int ra = rA(ctx->opcode);
> - int nr;
> -
> - if (ctx->le_mode) {
> - gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> - return;
> - }
> - if (nb == 0) {
> - nb = 32;
> - }
> - nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nb, 4);
> - if (unlikely(lsw_reg_in_range(start, nr, ra))) {
> - gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_LSWX);
> - return;
> - }
> - gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> - t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> - gen_addr_register(ctx, t0);
> - t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> - t2 = tcg_constant_i32(start);
> - gen_helper_lsw(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> -}
> -
> -/* lswx */
> -static void gen_lswx(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> - TCGv t0;
> - TCGv_i32 t1, t2, t3;
> -
> - if (ctx->le_mode) {
> - gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> - return;
> - }
> - gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> - t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> - gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, t0);
> - t1 = tcg_constant_i32(rD(ctx->opcode));
> - t2 = tcg_constant_i32(rA(ctx->opcode));
> - t3 = tcg_constant_i32(rB(ctx->opcode));
> - gen_helper_lswx(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2, t3);
> -}
> -
> -/* stswi */
> -static void gen_stswi(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> - TCGv t0;
> - TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> - int nb = NB(ctx->opcode);
> -
> - if (ctx->le_mode) {
> - gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> - return;
> - }
> - gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> - t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> - gen_addr_register(ctx, t0);
> - if (nb == 0) {
> - nb = 32;
> - }
> - t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> - t2 = tcg_constant_i32(rS(ctx->opcode));
> - gen_helper_stsw(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> -}
> -
> -/* stswx */
> -static void gen_stswx(DisasContext *ctx)
> -{
> - TCGv t0;
> - TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> -
> - if (ctx->le_mode) {
> - gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> - return;
> - }
> - gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> - t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> - gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, t0);
> - t1 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> - tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, cpu_xer);
> - tcg_gen_andi_i32(t1, t1, 0x7F);
> - t2 = tcg_constant_i32(rS(ctx->opcode));
> - gen_helper_stsw(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> -}
>
> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> static inline void gen_check_tlb_flush(DisasContext *ctx, bool global)
> @@ -4940,10 +4842,6 @@ GEN_HANDLER_E(dform39, 0x39, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA205),
> GEN_HANDLER_E(dform3D, 0x3D, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA205),
> GEN_HANDLER(lmw, 0x2E, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_INTEGER),
> GEN_HANDLER(stmw, 0x2F, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_INTEGER),
> -GEN_HANDLER(lswi, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x12, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
> -GEN_HANDLER(lswx, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x10, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
> -GEN_HANDLER(stswi, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x16, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
> -GEN_HANDLER(stswx, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x14, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
Looks like you have missed adding those ^ PPC_STRING flag checks in the
new trans_XXX() handlers.
Regards,
Chinmay
> /* ISA v3.0 changed the extended opcode from 62 to 30 */
> GEN_HANDLER(rfi, 0x13, 0x12, 0x01, 0x03FF8001, PPC_FLOW),
> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
> index 26b308e435..76b1011fad 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
> @@ -585,6 +585,109 @@ TRANS(CRANDC, cr_logic_common, tcg_gen_andc_i32);
> TRANS(CREQV, cr_logic_common, tcg_gen_eqv_i32);
> TRANS(CRORC, cr_logic_common, tcg_gen_orc_i32);
>
> +
> +/*** Integer load and store strings ***/
> +
> +/* lswi */
> +static bool trans_LSWI(DisasContext *ctx, arg_LSWI *a)
> +{
> + TCGv t0;
> + TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> + int nb = a->rb;
> + int start = a->rt;
> + int ra = a->ra;
> + int nr;
> +
> + if (ctx->le_mode) {
> + gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> + return true;
> + }
> + if (nb == 0) {
> + nb = 32;
> + }
> + nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(nb, 4);
> + if (unlikely(lsw_reg_in_range(start, nr, ra))) {
> + gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_LSWX);
> + return true;
> + }
> + gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> + t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> + gen_addr_register(ctx, t0);
> + t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> + t2 = tcg_constant_i32(start);
> + gen_helper_LSW(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* lswx */
> +static bool trans_LSWX(DisasContext *ctx, arg_LSWX *a)
> +{
> + TCGv t0;
> + TCGv_i32 t1, t2, t3;
> +
> + if (ctx->le_mode) {
> + gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> + t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> + gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, t0);
> + t1 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rt);
> + t2 = tcg_constant_i32(a->ra);
> + t3 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rb);
> + gen_helper_LSWX(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2, t3);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* stswi */
> +static bool trans_STSWI(DisasContext *ctx, arg_STSWI *a)
> +{
> + TCGv t0;
> + TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> + int nb = a->rb;
> +
> + if (ctx->le_mode) {
> + gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> + return true;
> + }
> + gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> + t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> + gen_addr_register(ctx, t0);
> + if (nb == 0) {
> + nb = 32;
> + }
> + t1 = tcg_constant_i32(nb);
> + t2 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rt);
> + gen_helper_STSW(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +/* stswx */
> +static bool trans_STSWX(DisasContext *ctx, arg_STSWX *a)
> +{
> + TCGv t0;
> + TCGv_i32 t1, t2;
> +
> + if (ctx->le_mode) {
> + gen_align_no_le(ctx);
> + return true;
> + }
> + gen_set_access_type(ctx, ACCESS_INT);
> + t0 = tcg_temp_new();
> + gen_addr_reg_index(ctx, t0);
> + t1 = tcg_temp_new_i32();
> + tcg_gen_trunc_tl_i32(t1, cpu_xer);
> + tcg_gen_andi_i32(t1, t1, 0x7F);
> + t2 = tcg_constant_i32(a->rt);
> + gen_helper_STSW(tcg_env, t0, t1, t2);
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static bool do_add_D(DisasContext *ctx, arg_D *a, bool add_ca, bool compute_ca,
> bool compute_ov, bool compute_rc0)
> {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 16:07 [RFC PATCH 00/28] target/ppc: Moving instructions to decodetree specification Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 01/28] target/ppc: Migrate extswsli to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 02/28] target/ppc: Migrate atomic loads " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 8:45 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 03/28] target/ppc: Convert cache instructions " Chinmay Rath
2026-06-01 16:06 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-06-30 14:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-06-30 15:17 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-08 12:11 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 04/28] target/ppc: Move vector merge " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:46 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 05/28] target/ppc: Move vector pack " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:47 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 06/28] target/ppc: Move st{b, h, w, d, q}cx " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:49 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 07/28] target/ppc: convert slw, srw instruction via decode spec Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 08/28] target/ppc: convert sraw[i] " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 09/28] target/ppc : Convert mcrf to decode tree Chinmay Rath
2026-06-12 8:38 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 10/28] target/ppc: Move fixed-point Shift insns to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 11/28] target/ppc: Move fixed-point byte-reversal store " Chinmay Rath
2026-06-12 15:16 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-08 8:41 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-07-06 16:21 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-08 8:42 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 12/28] target/ppc: Move GPR atomic load/store instructions " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:55 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 13/28] target/ppc: Move isync instruction " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:57 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 14/28] target/ppc: Convert b{a, l, la} to decode tree Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:58 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 15/28] target/ppc: move various conditional branch insns to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 17:20 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 16/28] target/ppc: Fix TRANS* macro variadic arguments handling Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 17/28] target/ppc: Move wait instruction to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 18/28] target/ppc: Move sleep & friends " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 17:48 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-07 5:09 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 19/28] target/ppc: Refactor sleep and its variants to use a common helper Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 20/28] target/ppc: Move Condition Register access instructions to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 21/28] target/ppc: Move Condition Register logical " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 22/28] target/ppc: Move Fixed-Point Load/Store String " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 8:54 ` Chinmay Rath [this message]
2026-07-06 14:01 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-06 18:09 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-07 10:36 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-08 7:41 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-08 8:46 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 23/28] target/ppc: Move VMX integer arithmetic and BCD " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 15:22 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 10:41 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 24/28] target/ppc: Move rlwimi, rlwinm " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 25/28] target/ppc: Move lmw, stmw " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 26/28] target/ppc: Move mfmsr, mtmsr[d] " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 27/28] target/ppc: Move byte-reverse " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 28/28] target/ppc: Move system call and rfi " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-22 8:29 ` [RFC PATCH 00/28] target/ppc: Moving instructions to decodetree specification Vishal Chourasia
2026-05-28 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2] target/ppc: Move system call and rfi instructions to decodetree Vishal Chourasia
2026-07-06 10:14 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-13 22:01 ` Vishal Chourasia
2026-07-13 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Vishal Chourasia
2026-05-28 11:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/28] target/ppc: Moving instructions to decodetree specification Vishal Chourasia
2026-06-03 11:39 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-06-03 14:10 ` Miles Glenn
2026-06-04 10:29 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-06-11 19:18 ` Miles Glenn
2026-06-30 5:42 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-08 11:30 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-06-03 14:30 ` Richard Henderson
2026-06-04 10:27 ` Chinmay Rath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a1b01852-701d-421d-a72e-0d357f40e16b@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rathc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=milesg@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=shivangu@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.