* gnupg vs gpgme @ 2013-04-22 7:34 Hans Beckérus 2013-04-22 7:47 ` Anders Darander 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Hans Beckérus @ 2013-04-22 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: yocto@yoctoproject.org Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can tell gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need for any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? Hans ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: gnupg vs gpgme 2013-04-22 7:34 gnupg vs gpgme Hans Beckérus @ 2013-04-22 7:47 ` Anders Darander 2013-04-22 7:58 ` Hans Beckérus 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Anders Darander @ 2013-04-22 7:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans Beckérus, yocto@yoctoproject.org Hi, "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: >Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can tell >gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need for >any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. Cheers, Anders >Hans >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >yocto@yoctoproject.org >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB Tel: +46 702 44 84 36 Laxholmstorget 3 Email: anders@chargestorm.se 602 21 Norrköping Web: www.chargestorm.se Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: gnupg vs gpgme 2013-04-22 7:47 ` Anders Darander @ 2013-04-22 7:58 ` Hans Beckérus 2013-04-22 8:04 ` Anders Darander 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Hans Beckérus @ 2013-04-22 7:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anders Darander; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: > Hi, > > "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can tell >>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need for >>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? > > Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. > Ah. Yes, now I see it. I think my mistake was that I searched for gpg not gnupg :( My bad. Is there anything that should make me consider 1.4.7 before 2.x? I am looking for something as lean as possible since there are very limited resources on the target system. Also, 1.4.13 seems to be considered current stable. I guess OE is lagging behind somewhat on this package? Hans On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: > Hi, > > "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: > >>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can tell >>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need for >>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? > > Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. > > Cheers, > Anders > >>Hans >>_______________________________________________ >>yocto mailing list >>yocto@yoctoproject.org >>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > -- > Anders Darander > ChargeStorm AB Tel: +46 702 44 84 36 > Laxholmstorget 3 Email: anders@chargestorm.se > 602 21 Norrköping Web: www.chargestorm.se > > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: gnupg vs gpgme 2013-04-22 7:58 ` Hans Beckérus @ 2013-04-22 8:04 ` Anders Darander 2013-04-22 8:09 ` Hans Beckérus 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Anders Darander @ 2013-04-22 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Hans Beckérus; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: >On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander ><anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can >tell >>>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need >for >>>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? >> >> Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in >OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. >> > >Ah. Yes, now I see it. I think my mistake was that I searched for gpg >not gnupg :( My bad. >Is there anything that should make me consider 1.4.7 before 2.x? I am >looking for something as lean as possible since there are very limited >resources on the target system. Also, 1.4.13 seems to be considered >current stable. I guess OE is lagging behind somewhat on this package? > Well, 1.4.7 was the last release under GPLv2, which is the primary reason for keeping it. 2.0 19 is what you'll get when requesting gnupg from the build system, unless you either prefer the old version or declare that you don't want GPLv3 in your images. Cheers, Anders -- Anders Darander ChargeStorm AB Tel: +46 702 44 84 36 Laxholmstorget 3 Email: anders@chargestorm.se 602 21 Norrköping Web: www.chargestorm.se Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: gnupg vs gpgme 2013-04-22 8:04 ` Anders Darander @ 2013-04-22 8:09 ` Hans Beckérus 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Hans Beckérus @ 2013-04-22 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Anders Darander; +Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: > > > "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander >><anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can >>tell >>>>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>>>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need >>for >>>>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>>>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>>>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? >>> >>> Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in >>OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. >>> >> >>Ah. Yes, now I see it. I think my mistake was that I searched for gpg >>not gnupg :( My bad. >>Is there anything that should make me consider 1.4.7 before 2.x? I am >>looking for something as lean as possible since there are very limited >>resources on the target system. Also, 1.4.13 seems to be considered >>current stable. I guess OE is lagging behind somewhat on this package? >> > > Well, 1.4.7 was the last release under GPLv2, which is the primary reason for keeping it. 2.0 19 is what you'll get when >requesting gnupg from the build system, unless you either prefer the old version or declare that you don't want GPLv3 in >your images. Ok I see. Thanks. GPLv2 vs GPLv3 is not an issue in my case. More important is which version adds the lesser footprint. My guess is that 1.4.x is what I am looking for. But I will try and build both to see which suits the best. Hans On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Anders Darander <anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: > > > "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Anders Darander >><anders@chargestorm.se> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> "Hans Beckérus" <hans.beckerus@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Hello. I wish to bring in gnupg to our system but from what I can >>tell >>>>gnupg is not part of Yocto nor OpenEmbedded. However, gpgme is. Is >>>>gpgme to consider a complete replacement for gnupg? I have no need >>for >>>>any gpg application libraries, but need the ability to sign and >>>>perhaps encrypt/decrypt information. Is an option here to bring in >>>>gnupg 1.4.13 myself or is this not something you should recommend? >>> >>> Well there are recipes for gnupg versions 1.4.7 and 2.0.19 in >>OE-Core, and this in Yocto. See meta/recipes-support. >>> >> >>Ah. Yes, now I see it. I think my mistake was that I searched for gpg >>not gnupg :( My bad. >>Is there anything that should make me consider 1.4.7 before 2.x? I am >>looking for something as lean as possible since there are very limited >>resources on the target system. Also, 1.4.13 seems to be considered >>current stable. I guess OE is lagging behind somewhat on this package? >> > > Well, 1.4.7 was the last release under GPLv2, which is the primary reason for keeping it. 2.0 19 is what you'll get when requesting gnupg from the build system, unless you either prefer the old version or declare that you don't want GPLv3 in your images. > > Cheers, > Anders > > -- > Anders Darander > ChargeStorm AB Tel: +46 702 44 84 36 > Laxholmstorget 3 Email: anders@chargestorm.se > 602 21 Norrköping Web: www.chargestorm.se > > Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-04-22 8:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-04-22 7:34 gnupg vs gpgme Hans Beckérus 2013-04-22 7:47 ` Anders Darander 2013-04-22 7:58 ` Hans Beckérus 2013-04-22 8:04 ` Anders Darander 2013-04-22 8:09 ` Hans Beckérus
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.