All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Rick wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Adjust read mask and write
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:23:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFV8_k4vne-m3Rzh@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d52fce68-d01e-4b92-825f-f7408df2ca18@arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 03:19:06PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2025-06-13 6:04 pm, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > Section 17.6.10 of the RK3399 TRM "PCIe PIPE PHY registers Description"
> > defines asynchronous strobe TEST_WRITE which should be enabled then
> > disabled and seems to have been copy-pasted as of current. Adjust it.
> 
> FWIW that's a bit hard to make sense of, given that it bears no relation 
> whatsoever to the naming used in the code :/
> 
> (Not least because the mapping of register fields to phy signals here is 
> really a property of GRF_SOC_CON8 rather than the phy itself)

Hi Robin,

will adjust for a better commit message, thank you.

> 
> > While at it, adjust read mask which should be the same as write mask.
> 
> Which write mask? Certainly not PHY_CFG_WR_MASK... However as this 
> definition is unused since 64cdc0360811 ("phy: rockchip-pcie: remove 
> unused phy_rd_cfg function"), I don't see much point in touching it 
> other than to remove it entirely. If it is the case that only the 
> address field is significant for whatever a "read" operation actually 
> means, well then that's just another job for ADDR_MASK (which I guess is 
> what the open-coded business with PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK is actually doing...)

Oh, I already had agreed on Bjorn's suggestion to drop PHY_CFG_RD_MASK
for good from code, but I appreciate your input too.

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

> 
> Thanks,
> Robin.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > index 48bcc7d2b33b..35d2523ee776 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
> >   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT    1
> >   #define PHY_CFG_DATA_MASK     0xf
> >   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK     0x3f
> > -#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3ff
> > +#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3f
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_ENABLE     1
> > -#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    1
> > +#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    0
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_SHIFT      0
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_MASK       1
> >   #define PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK      0x10
> 


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Rick wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Adjust read mask and write
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:23:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFV8_k4vne-m3Rzh@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d52fce68-d01e-4b92-825f-f7408df2ca18@arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 03:19:06PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2025-06-13 6:04 pm, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > Section 17.6.10 of the RK3399 TRM "PCIe PIPE PHY registers Description"
> > defines asynchronous strobe TEST_WRITE which should be enabled then
> > disabled and seems to have been copy-pasted as of current. Adjust it.
> 
> FWIW that's a bit hard to make sense of, given that it bears no relation 
> whatsoever to the naming used in the code :/
> 
> (Not least because the mapping of register fields to phy signals here is 
> really a property of GRF_SOC_CON8 rather than the phy itself)

Hi Robin,

will adjust for a better commit message, thank you.

> 
> > While at it, adjust read mask which should be the same as write mask.
> 
> Which write mask? Certainly not PHY_CFG_WR_MASK... However as this 
> definition is unused since 64cdc0360811 ("phy: rockchip-pcie: remove 
> unused phy_rd_cfg function"), I don't see much point in touching it 
> other than to remove it entirely. If it is the case that only the 
> address field is significant for whatever a "read" operation actually 
> means, well then that's just another job for ADDR_MASK (which I guess is 
> what the open-coded business with PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK is actually doing...)

Oh, I already had agreed on Bjorn's suggestion to drop PHY_CFG_RD_MASK
for good from code, but I appreciate your input too.

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

> 
> Thanks,
> Robin.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > index 48bcc7d2b33b..35d2523ee776 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
> >   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT    1
> >   #define PHY_CFG_DATA_MASK     0xf
> >   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK     0x3f
> > -#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3ff
> > +#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3f
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_ENABLE     1
> > -#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    1
> > +#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    0
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_SHIFT      0
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_MASK       1
> >   #define PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK      0x10
> 

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	"Shawn Lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Vinod Koul" <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	"Kishon Vijay Abraham I" <kishon@kernel.org>,
	"Rick wertenbroek" <rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Adjust read mask and write
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 12:23:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFV8_k4vne-m3Rzh@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d52fce68-d01e-4b92-825f-f7408df2ca18@arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 03:19:06PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2025-06-13 6:04 pm, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> > Section 17.6.10 of the RK3399 TRM "PCIe PIPE PHY registers Description"
> > defines asynchronous strobe TEST_WRITE which should be enabled then
> > disabled and seems to have been copy-pasted as of current. Adjust it.
> 
> FWIW that's a bit hard to make sense of, given that it bears no relation 
> whatsoever to the naming used in the code :/
> 
> (Not least because the mapping of register fields to phy signals here is 
> really a property of GRF_SOC_CON8 rather than the phy itself)

Hi Robin,

will adjust for a better commit message, thank you.

> 
> > While at it, adjust read mask which should be the same as write mask.
> 
> Which write mask? Certainly not PHY_CFG_WR_MASK... However as this 
> definition is unused since 64cdc0360811 ("phy: rockchip-pcie: remove 
> unused phy_rd_cfg function"), I don't see much point in touching it 
> other than to remove it entirely. If it is the case that only the 
> address field is significant for whatever a "read" operation actually 
> means, well then that's just another job for ADDR_MASK (which I guess is 
> what the open-coded business with PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK is actually doing...)

Oh, I already had agreed on Bjorn's suggestion to drop PHY_CFG_RD_MASK
for good from code, but I appreciate your input too.

Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento

> 
> Thanks,
> Robin.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > index 48bcc7d2b33b..35d2523ee776 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/rockchip/phy-rockchip-pcie.c
> > @@ -30,9 +30,9 @@
> >   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_SHIFT    1
> >   #define PHY_CFG_DATA_MASK     0xf
> >   #define PHY_CFG_ADDR_MASK     0x3f
> > -#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3ff
> > +#define PHY_CFG_RD_MASK       0x3f
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_ENABLE     1
> > -#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    1
> > +#define PHY_CFG_WR_DISABLE    0
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_SHIFT      0
> >   #define PHY_CFG_WR_MASK       1
> >   #define PHY_CFG_PLL_LOCK      0x10
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-20 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-13 17:03 [RFC PATCH v5 0/4] PCI: rockchip: Improve driver quality Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03 ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: rockchip: Use standard PCIe defines Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 2/4] PCI: rockchip: Set Target Link Speed before retraining Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 18:06   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 18:06     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 18:06     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:33   ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:33     ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:33     ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:43     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:43       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:43       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03 ` [RFC PATCH v5 3/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Enable all four lanes Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:03   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:04   ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:04     ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:04     ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:26     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:26       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:26       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:47       ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:47         ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 12:47         ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 13:00         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 13:00           ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 13:00           ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:50       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:50         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 12:50         ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:04 ` [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] phy: rockchip-pcie: Adjust read mask and write Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:04   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-13 17:04   ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 14:19   ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 14:19     ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 14:19     ` Robin Murphy
2025-06-20 15:23     ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
2025-06-20 15:23       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 15:23       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 18:35     ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 18:35       ` Geraldo Nascimento
2025-06-20 18:35       ` Geraldo Nascimento

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFV8_k4vne-m3Rzh@geday \
    --to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.wertenbroek@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.