From: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
To: Coly Li <colyli@kernel.org>
Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Improper io_opt setting for md raid5
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:51:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHaHLKp7-RrYUeJW@kbusch-mbp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ywsfp3lqnijgig6yrlv2ztxram6ohf5z4yfeebswjkvp2dzisd@f5ikoyo3sfq5>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 11:56:57PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> 240 if (dma_dev->dma_mask) {
> 241 shost->opt_sectors = min_t(unsigned int, shost->max_sectors,
> 242 dma_opt_mapping_size(dma_dev) >> SECTOR_SHIFT);
> 243 }
Just comparing how NVMe uses dma_opt_mapping_size(), that return is used
to limit its "max_sectors" rather than opt_sectors, so this different
usages seems odd to me. But there doesn't appear to be anything else
setting shost->opt_sectors either.
> Then in drivers/scsi/sd.c, inside sd_revalidate_disk() from the following coce,
> 3785 /*
> 3786 * Limit default to SCSI host optimal sector limit if set. There may be
> 3787 * an impact on performance for when the size of a request exceeds this
> 3788 * host limit.
> 3789 */
> 3790 lim.io_opt = sdp->host->opt_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
Checking where "opt_sectors" was introduced, 608128d391fa5c9 says it was
to provide the host optimal sectors, but the io_opt limit is supposed to
be the device's. Seems to be a mistmatch in usage here, as "opt_sectors"
should only be the upper limit for "io_opt" rather than the starting
value.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 15:56 Improper io_opt setting for md raid5 Coly Li
2025-07-15 16:51 ` Keith Busch [this message]
2025-07-15 17:28 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-16 7:26 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-16 12:34 ` Coly Li
2025-07-27 10:50 ` Csordás Hunor
2025-07-28 0:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 0:55 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-28 2:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 3:08 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-28 3:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 7:14 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-28 7:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 9:02 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 4:23 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 6:25 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 22:02 ` Tony Battersby
2025-07-29 6:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-29 6:29 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 22:24 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-28 10:56 ` Csordás Hunor
2025-07-29 4:08 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 3:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 3:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 4:44 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHaHLKp7-RrYUeJW@kbusch-mbp \
--to=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.