From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: "Csordás Hunor" <csordas.hunor@gmail.com>
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Improper io_opt setting for md raid5
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 00:44:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1seiflj0m.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bdf20964-e1ee-45a9-bf24-3396e957ff67@gmail.com> ("Csordás Hunor"'s message of "Sun, 27 Jul 2025 12:50:48 +0200")
Csordás,
I basically agree with everything in your analysis.
>> Then in drivers/scsi/sd.c, inside sd_revalidate_disk() from the following coce,
>> 3785 /*
>> 3786 * Limit default to SCSI host optimal sector limit if set. There may be
>> 3787 * an impact on performance for when the size of a request exceeds this
>> 3788 * host limit.
>> 3789 */
>> 3790 lim.io_opt = sdp->host->opt_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
>> 3791 if (sd_validate_opt_xfer_size(sdkp, dev_max)) {
>> 3792 lim.io_opt = min_not_zero(lim.io_opt,
>> 3793 logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks));
>> 3794 }
>>
>> lim.io_opt of all my sata disks attached to mpt3sas HBA are all 32767 sectors,
>> because the above code block.
shost->opt_sectors was originally used to seed rw_max and not io_opt, I
think that is the appropriate thing to do.
A SCSI host driver reporting some ludicrous limit is not necessarily
representative of a "good" I/O size as far as neither disk drive, nor
the Linux I/O stack is concerned.
shost->opt_sectors should clearly set an upper bound for max_sectors.
But I don't think we should ever increase any queue limit based on what
is reported in opt_sectors.
--
Martin K. Petersen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-29 4:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 15:56 Improper io_opt setting for md raid5 Coly Li
2025-07-15 16:51 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-15 17:28 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-16 7:26 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-16 12:34 ` Coly Li
2025-07-27 10:50 ` Csordás Hunor
2025-07-28 0:39 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 0:55 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-28 2:41 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 3:08 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-28 3:49 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 7:14 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-28 7:44 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-07-28 9:02 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 4:23 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 6:25 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 22:02 ` Tony Battersby
2025-07-29 6:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-29 6:29 ` Yu Kuai
2025-07-29 22:24 ` Keith Busch
2025-07-28 10:56 ` Csordás Hunor
2025-07-29 4:08 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 3:53 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 3:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-07-29 4:44 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1seiflj0m.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=colyli@kernel.org \
--cc=csordas.hunor@gmail.com \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.