All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"open list:MEMORY MAPPING" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 04:16:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aK_YO90AEgow_iQt@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aK_V4sOUOIpEhFC-@google.com>

On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 04:06:58AM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 11:43:39PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> > * Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com> [250827 23:27]:
> > > Commit 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity
> > > checks") moved the sanity check for vrm->new_addr from mremap_to() to
> > > check_mremap_params().
> > > 
> > > However, this caused a regression as vrm->new_addr is now checked even
> > > when MREMAP_FIXED and MREMAP_DONTUNMAP flags are not specified. In this
> > > case, vrm->new_addr can be garbage and create unexpected failures.
> > > 
> > > Fix this by moving the new_addr check after the vrm_implies_new_addr()
> > > guard. This ensures that the new_addr is only checked when the user has
> > > specified one explicitly.
> > > 
> > > Fixes: 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity checks")
> > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> > 
> > I assume this showed up with clang?
> 
> Right.
> 
> The specific test that broke on our end was this:
> https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/HEAD/tests/__cxa_atexit_test.cpp
> Although I'm not exactly sure how __cxa_atexit() implementation uses
> mremap() underneath.

Ok, here is the specific call to mremap() in the test:
https://android.googlesource.com/platform/bionic/+/HEAD/libc/bionic/atexit.cpp#197


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-28  4:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-28  3:26 [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28  3:43 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-28  4:06   ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28  4:16     ` Carlos Llamas [this message]
2025-08-28  5:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 14:13   ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:21   ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:22     ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 14:29       ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:31         ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:26   ` [PATCH v2] " Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:30     ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:34     ` Lorenzo Stoakes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aK_YO90AEgow_iQt@google.com \
    --to=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
    --cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.