From: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:MEMORY MAPPING" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:29:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLBn4vb0Pmwoqt51@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b58449cc-022b-497a-97f2-c91776d133dc@lucifer.local>
On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 03:22:54PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 04:21:05PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 8/28/25 07:38, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 03:26:52AM +0000, Carlos Llamas wrote:
> > >> Commit 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity
> > >> checks") moved the sanity check for vrm->new_addr from mremap_to() to
> > >> check_mremap_params().
> > >>
> > >> However, this caused a regression as vrm->new_addr is now checked even
> > >> when MREMAP_FIXED and MREMAP_DONTUNMAP flags are not specified. In this
> > >> case, vrm->new_addr can be garbage and create unexpected failures.
> > >
> > > Yikes, sorry my mistake.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Fix this by moving the new_addr check after the vrm_implies_new_addr()
> > >> guard. This ensures that the new_addr is only checked when the user has
> > >> specified one explicitly.
> > >>
> > >> Fixes: 3215eaceca87 ("mm/mremap: refactor initial parameter sanity checks")
> > >> Signed-off-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> > >
> > > You need a Cc: Stable.
> >
> > No need as the commit being fixed is from 6.17-rc1?
> > But it's better to use "[PATCH mm-hotfixes]" to make sure it goes to 6.17
> > and not the next merge window.
> >
>
> Ah haha really? I'm losing track of my patches.
>
> Yeah sure as per Vlasta then Carlos :)
Oops, sorry my v2 raced with this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-28 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-28 3:26 [PATCH] mm/mremap: fix regression in vrm->new_addr check Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 3:43 ` Liam R. Howlett
2025-08-28 4:06 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 4:16 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 5:38 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 14:13 ` Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:21 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-08-28 14:29 ` Carlos Llamas [this message]
2025-08-28 14:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Carlos Llamas
2025-08-28 14:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-08-28 14:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aLBn4vb0Pmwoqt51@google.com \
--to=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.