All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
	Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux.dev,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 nf-next 1/3] netfilter: utils: nf_checksum(_partial) correct data!=networkheader
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2025 23:09:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aLyjIuGj7BAEAO8B@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250708151209.2006140-2-ericwouds@gmail.com>

Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the conntrack hook it may not always be the case that:
> skb_network_header(skb) == skb->data.
> 
> This is problematic when L4 function nf_conntrack_handle_packet()
> is accessing L3 data. This function uses thoff and ip_hdr()
> to finds it's data. But it also calculates the checksum.
> nf_checksum() and nf_checksum_partial() both use lower skb-checksum
> functions that are based on using skb->data.
> 
> When skb_network_header(skb) != skb->data, adjust accordingly,
> so that the checksum is calculated correctly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@gmail.com>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/utils.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/utils.c b/net/netfilter/utils.c
> index 008419db815a..9ba822983bc0 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/utils.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/utils.c
> @@ -124,16 +124,20 @@ __sum16 nf_checksum(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int hook,
>  		    unsigned int dataoff, u8 protocol,
>  		    unsigned short family)
>  {
> +	unsigned int nhpull = skb_network_header(skb) - skb->data;

skb_network_offset() ?

And can you add a comment that tells why there is a need
for pull/push pair despite the dataoff - nhpull argument?

> +	DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_pointer_if_linear(skb, nhpull, 0));

maybe if (DEBUG_NET_WARN ...
	return 0 ?

> @@ -143,18 +147,22 @@ __sum16 nf_checksum_partial(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int hook,
>  			    unsigned int dataoff, unsigned int len,
>  			    u8 protocol, unsigned short family)
>  {
> +	unsigned int nhpull = skb_network_header(skb) - skb->data;
>  	__sum16 csum = 0;
> +	DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE(!skb_pointer_if_linear(skb, nhpull, 0));
> +	__skb_pull(skb, nhpull);

Same here, but no need to copy the comment from nf_checksum, its enough
to say something like "see nf_checksum()".

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-06 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08 15:12 [PATCH v14 nf-next 0/3] conntrack: bridge: add double vlan, pppoe and pppoe-in-q Eric Woudstra
2025-07-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v14 nf-next 1/3] netfilter: utils: nf_checksum(_partial) correct data!=networkheader Eric Woudstra
2025-09-06 21:09   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-07-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v14 nf-next 2/3] netfilter: bridge: Add conntrack double vlan and pppoe Eric Woudstra
2025-07-08 22:00   ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-06 21:11   ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-09  9:17     ` Eric Woudstra
2025-07-08 15:12 ` [PATCH v14 nf-next 3/3] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge " Eric Woudstra
2025-07-08 22:02   ` Florian Westphal
2025-07-11 12:55     ` Eric Woudstra
2025-07-11 14:14       ` Florian Westphal
2025-07-12 10:08         ` Eric Woudstra
2025-07-12 10:50           ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-02  8:48         ` Eric Woudstra
2025-09-02 13:18           ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-06 12:26             ` Eric Woudstra
2025-09-06 21:14   ` Florian Westphal
2025-09-09  9:21     ` Eric Woudstra
2025-09-09 14:26       ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aLyjIuGj7BAEAO8B@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=ericwouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.