Re: Report on MAINTAINERS coverage

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 02:37:43PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 01:45:24PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >> Which unmaintained files are we still changing?  Unmaintained files
> >> sorted by number of commits in the past year (since v9.2.0):
> >> 
> >>     $ for i in `cat unmaintained-files`; do echo -n "$i "; git-rev-list v9.2.0.. $i | wc -l; done | awk '{ printf "%7d %s\n", $2, $1 }' | sort -rn
> >> 
> >>     107 tests/functional/meson.build
> >
> > Opps, that's a mistake. It should of course be under the
> > general maint heading "Functional testing framework"
> 
> Thanks!  I can patch that.
> 
> What about the other uncovered files in tests/functional/?

> tests/functional/aarch64/meson.build

[snip many more]

I'd wildcard   tests/functional/*/meson.build under the
general maint.

> tests/functional/acpi-bits/bits-config/bits-cfg.txt
> tests/functional/acpi-bits/bits-tests/smbios.py2
> tests/functional/acpi-bits/bits-tests/smilatency.py2
> tests/functional/acpi-bits/bits-tests/testacpi.py2
> tests/functional/acpi-bits/bits-tests/testcpuid.py2

I expected those to already be covered by:

  ACPI/FUNCTIONAL/BIOSBITS
  M: Ani Sinha <anisinha@redhat.com>
  M: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
  S: Supported
  F: tests/functional/acpi-bits/*
  F: tests/functional/x86_64/test_acpi_bits.py
  F: docs/devel/testing/acpi-bits.rst

but I guess tests/functional/acpi-bits/*  doesn't recurse
into subdirs ?

> tests/functional/arm/test_max78000fthr.py

Added by Thomas but not sure what maintainers category it should go
under.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|