Re: Report on MAINTAINERS coverage

["Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 03:06:00PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 18/12/2025 14.49, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 02:37:43PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 01:45:24PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> > > > > Which unmaintained files are we still changing?  Unmaintained files
> > > > > sorted by number of commits in the past year (since v9.2.0):
> > > > > 
> > > > >      $ for i in `cat unmaintained-files`; do echo -n "$i "; git-rev-list v9.2.0.. $i | wc -l; done | awk '{ printf "%7d %s\n", $2, $1 }' | sort -rn
> > > > > 
> > > > >      107 tests/functional/meson.build
> > > > 
> > > > Opps, that's a mistake. It should of course be under the
> > > > general maint heading "Functional testing framework"
> > > 
> > > Thanks!  I can patch that.
> > > 
> > > What about the other uncovered files in tests/functional/?
> > 
> > > tests/functional/aarch64/meson.build
> > 
> > [snip many more]
> > 
> > I'd wildcard   tests/functional/*/meson.build under the
> > general maint.
> 
> Either that, or make sure the the architecture maintainers own the whole
> tests/functional/<arch> folders.

Yeah, its a 50/50 decision from my POV. Most of the content is
just a mechanical listing of test files, but there's some level
of thought in the appropriate test timeouts which might push
towards the arch maintainers owning it.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|