All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>,
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:11:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXqJfeucaR8yUnnw@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aXqIWDXsP2AQ2tBd@ideak-desk.lan>

On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 12:06:16AM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:36:30PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> > Similar to the DP SST, refactor `mst_stream_compute_config()` to iterate
> > over joiner candidates and select the minimal joiner configuration that
> > satisfies the mode requirements. This prepares the logic for future changes
> > that will consider DSC slice overhead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > index 29ac7b2e1e9c..7a83af89ef03 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> > @@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  	const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode =
> >  		&pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> >  	int num_joined_pipes;
> > +	int num_pipes;
> >  	int ret = 0;
> >  
> >  	if (pipe_config->fec_enable &&
> > @@ -700,17 +701,45 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> >  	pipe_config->output_format = INTEL_OUTPUT_FORMAT_RGB;
> >  	pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
> >  
> > -	num_joined_pipes = intel_dp_num_joined_pipes(intel_dp, connector,

intel_dp_num_joined_pipes() is unused after this, so it can be removed.

> > -						     adjusted_mode->crtc_hdisplay,
> > -						     adjusted_mode->crtc_clock);
> > +	for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> > +		int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> >  
> > -	if (num_joined_pipes > 1)
> > -		pipe_config->joiner_pipes = GENMASK(crtc->pipe + num_joined_pipes - 1, crtc->pipe);
> > +		ret = -EINVAL;
> 
> I suppose in case no valid configuration is found the error code
> propagated from this function should be either the error code returned
> by the last mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes() call (which
> should also handle the adjusted_mode->clock <= max_dotclk check
> internally) for the last valid joined-pipe it was called, or -EINVAL if
> there wasn't any valid joined-pipe candidate (and so
> mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes() was never called). The above
> ret = -EINVAL could overwrite ret which was set by the last call of
> mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(). To avoid that I'd init ret =
> -EINVAL before the loop.
> 
> > +
> > +		if (num_pipes == 0) {
> > +			if (!connector->force_joined_pipes)
> > +				continue;
> > +			num_joined_pipes = connector->force_joined_pipes;
> > +		} else {
> > +			num_joined_pipes = num_pipes;
> > +		}
> 
> I'd simplify the above as mentioned in earlier patches.
> 
> > +
> > +		if (!intel_dp_can_join(display, num_joined_pipes))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (adjusted_mode->hdisplay >
> > +		    num_joined_pipes * intel_dp_max_hdisplay_per_pipe(display))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		if (num_joined_pipes > 1)
> > +			pipe_config->joiner_pipes = GENMASK(crtc->pipe + num_joined_pipes - 1,
> > +							    crtc->pipe);
> > +
> > +		ret = mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(encoder,
> > +							       pipe_config,
> > +							       conn_state,
> > +							       num_joined_pipes);
> > +		if (ret)
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
> > +
> > +		if (adjusted_mode->clock <= max_dotclk) {
> > +			ret = 0;
> 
> ret stays 0 if adjusted_mode->clock > max_dotclk (and num_pipes ==
> I915_MAX_PIPES - 1). Also, this max_dotclk check should be moved to
> mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes() and checked for both non-dsc
> and dsc (falling back to dsc if needed), similarly to the SST case.
> 
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >  
> > -	ret = mst_stream_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(encoder,
> > -						       pipe_config,
> > -						       conn_state,
> > -						       num_joined_pipes);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.45.2
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-28 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-28 14:06 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 16:46   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29  5:21     ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29  5:48       ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29  9:24         ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 10:01           ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:03   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:07   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 21:21   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:06   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 22:11     ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:17   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29  3:57   ` kernel test robot
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:19   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:35   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 23:00   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:49   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL and pre PTL platforms Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:53   ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 15:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:19 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-01-28 20:04 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-01-29 17:11 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 17:11 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-29 20:01   ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aXqJfeucaR8yUnnw@ideak-desk.lan \
    --to=imre.deak@intel.com \
    --cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.