From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2026 00:35:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aXqPLyiXrzRTKUw6@ideak-desk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128140636.3527799-14-ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:36:33PM +0530, Ankit Nautiyal wrote:
> Account for DSC slice overhead bubbles and adjust the pixel rate while
> checking the pixel rate against the max dotclock limits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c | 1 -
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h | 3 +++
> 5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 0acb3b64cf27..c1ff92367808 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1451,6 +1451,8 @@ bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
>
> bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
> int target_clock,
> + int htotal,
> + int dsc_slice_count,
> int num_joined_pipes)
> {
> int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> @@ -1458,6 +1460,12 @@ bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
>
> effective_dotclk_limit = max_dotclk * num_joined_pipes;
>
> + if (dsc_slice_count)
> + target_clock = intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(display,
> + target_clock,
> + htotal,
> + dsc_slice_count);
> +
> return target_clock <= effective_dotclk_limit;
> }
>
> @@ -1592,8 +1600,13 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> if (status != MODE_OK)
> continue;
>
> + if (!dsc)
> + dsc_slice_count = 0;
> +
> if (intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> target_clock,
> + mode->htotal,
> + dsc_slice_count,
> num_joined_pipes)) {
> status = MODE_OK;
> break;
> @@ -2827,6 +2840,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> int max_dotclk = display->cdclk.max_dotclk_freq;
> struct link_config_limits limits;
> bool dsc_needed, joiner_needs_dsc;
> + int dsc_slice_count = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> joiner_needs_dsc = intel_dp_joiner_needs_dsc(display, num_joined_pipes);
> @@ -2878,10 +2892,15 @@ intel_dp_compute_link_for_joined_pipes(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + if (pipe_config->dsc.compression_enable)
> + dsc_slice_count = intel_dsc_line_slice_count(&pipe_config->dsc.slice_config);
> +
> max_dotclk *= num_joined_pipes;
>
> if (!intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> adjusted_mode->crtc_clock,
> + adjusted_mode->crtc_htotal,
> + dsc_slice_count,
> num_joined_pipes))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> index 78fa8eaba4ac..beef480b7672 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h
> @@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ bool intel_dp_can_join(struct intel_display *display,
> int num_joined_pipes);
> bool intel_dp_dotclk_valid(struct intel_display *display,
> int target_clock,
> + int htotal,
> + int dsc_slice_count,
> int num_joined_pipes);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_DP_H__ */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> index f433a01dcfcb..bdf2f09fa03e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c
> @@ -702,6 +702,7 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> pipe_config->has_pch_encoder = false;
>
> for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> + int dsc_slice_count = 0;
>
> ret = -EINVAL;
>
> @@ -731,8 +732,12 @@ static int mst_stream_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> if (ret)
> continue;
>
> + dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_mst_dsc_get_slice_count(connector, pipe_config);
> +
> if (intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> adjusted_mode->clock,
> + adjusted_mode->htotal,
> + dsc_slice_count,
> num_joined_pipes)) {
> ret = 0;
> break;
> @@ -1531,6 +1536,7 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> }
>
> for (num_pipes = 0; num_pipes < I915_MAX_PIPES; num_pipes++) {
> + int dsc_slice_count = 0;
>
> *status = MODE_CLOCK_HIGH;
>
> @@ -1556,6 +1562,11 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
> */
> int pipe_bpp = intel_dp_dsc_compute_max_bpp(connector, U8_MAX);
>
> + dsc_slice_count = intel_dp_dsc_get_slice_count(connector,
> + mode->clock,
> + mode->hdisplay,
> + num_joined_pipes);
> +
> if (!drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate(max_link_clock))
> bw_overhead_flags |= DRM_DP_BW_OVERHEAD_FEC;
>
> @@ -1580,6 +1591,8 @@ mst_connector_mode_valid_ctx(struct drm_connector *_connector,
>
The if (!dsc) dsc_slice_count = 0; part you added for SST is missing
from here.
> if (intel_dp_dotclk_valid(display,
> mode->clock,
> + mode->htotal,
> + dsc_slice_count,
> num_joined_pipes)) {
> *status = MODE_OK;
> break;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> index 642a89270d8e..7e53201b3cb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.c
> @@ -1104,7 +1104,6 @@ void intel_vdsc_state_dump(struct drm_printer *p, int indent,
> drm_dsc_dump_config(p, indent, &crtc_state->dsc.config);
> }
>
> -static
> int intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(struct intel_display *display,
> int pixel_rate, int htotal,
> int dsc_horizontal_slices)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
> index aeb17670307b..f4d5b37293cf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_vdsc.h
> @@ -41,5 +41,8 @@ void intel_vdsc_state_dump(struct drm_printer *p, int indent,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> int intel_vdsc_min_cdclk(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> unsigned int intel_vdsc_prefill_lines(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);
> +int intel_dsc_get_pixel_rate_with_dsc_bubbles(struct intel_display *display,
> + int pixel_rate, int htotal,
> + int dsc_horizontal_slices);
>
> #endif /* __INTEL_VDSC_H__ */
> --
> 2.45.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-28 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-28 14:06 [PATCH 00/16] Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/dp: Early reject bad hdisplay in intel_dp_mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/dp: Move num_joined_pipes and related checks together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/dp: Extract helper to get the hdisplay limit Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 16:46 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 5:21 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29 5:48 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-29 9:24 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 10:01 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/dp: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:03 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the check for dotclock at the end Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 17:07 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Move the joiner dependent code together Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in mode_valid Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 21:21 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Extract helper to compute link for given joiner config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915/dp_mst: Rework pipe joiner logic in compute_config Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:06 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 22:11 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915/dp: Introduce helper to check pixel rate against dotclock limits Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:17 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-29 3:57 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915/dp: Refactor dsc_slice_count handling in intel_dp_mode_valid() Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:19 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915/dp: Account for DSC slice overhead Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 22:35 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915/dp: Add helpers for joiner candidate loops Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 23:00 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915/display: Add upper limit check for pixel clock Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:49 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 14:06 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915/display: Extend the max dotclock limit to WCL and pre PTL platforms Ankit Nautiyal
2026-01-28 20:53 ` Imre Deak
2026-01-28 15:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success for Account for DSC bubble overhead for horizontal slices (rev4) Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:02 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:03 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:19 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2026-01-28 19:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2026-01-28 20:04 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aXqPLyiXrzRTKUw6@ideak-desk.lan \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.