From: Sumit Garg via OP-TEE <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
Chen Ni <nichen@iscas.ac.cn>,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: Check return value of tee_shm_get_va()
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 10:32:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abY9WIm2z29SvJeG@sumit-xelite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44GkZ3jgJg=s+a4RnvMggCxu+mVhU=0z3BKWGkHqDKGaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:16:11PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 10:16 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 12:52:39PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > …
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> > > > @@ -393,6 +393,11 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_rpmb_frames(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > > params[0].u.memref.shm_offs);
> > > > p1 = tee_shm_get_va(params[1].u.memref.shm,
> > > > params[1].u.memref.shm_offs);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(p0) || IS_ERR(p1)) {
> > > > + arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > if (rpmb_route_frames(rdev, p0, params[0].u.memref.size, p1,
> > > > params[1].u.memref.size)) {
> > > > arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> > > …
> > >
> > > How do you think about to use an additional label for the shown
> > > error code assignment?
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v7.0-rc2#n526
> > >
> >
> > I suppose here you meant to update the label name since it's the same
> > error type used by other code paths too. So following label rename
> > should be fine I think as per coding guidelines:
> >
> > s/out/err_dev_put/
>
> Wouldn't the name err_dev_put suggest this only occurs in the error path?
>
Okay, let rather rename it to out_dev_put.
-Sumit
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
Chen Ni <nichen@iscas.ac.cn>,
op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] optee: Check return value of tee_shm_get_va()
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 10:32:16 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abY9WIm2z29SvJeG@sumit-xelite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHUa44GkZ3jgJg=s+a4RnvMggCxu+mVhU=0z3BKWGkHqDKGaSQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:16:11PM +0100, Jens Wiklander wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 10:16 AM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 06, 2026 at 12:52:39PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > …
> > > > +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/rpc.c
> > > > @@ -393,6 +393,11 @@ static void handle_rpc_func_rpmb_frames(struct tee_context *ctx,
> > > > params[0].u.memref.shm_offs);
> > > > p1 = tee_shm_get_va(params[1].u.memref.shm,
> > > > params[1].u.memref.shm_offs);
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(p0) || IS_ERR(p1)) {
> > > > + arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > if (rpmb_route_frames(rdev, p0, params[0].u.memref.size, p1,
> > > > params[1].u.memref.size)) {
> > > > arg->ret = TEEC_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> > > …
> > >
> > > How do you think about to use an additional label for the shown
> > > error code assignment?
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?h=v7.0-rc2#n526
> > >
> >
> > I suppose here you meant to update the label name since it's the same
> > error type used by other code paths too. So following label rename
> > should be fine I think as per coding guidelines:
> >
> > s/out/err_dev_put/
>
> Wouldn't the name err_dev_put suggest this only occurs in the error path?
>
Okay, let rather rename it to out_dev_put.
-Sumit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-15 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-05 8:33 [PATCH] optee: Check return value of tee_shm_get_va() Chen Ni
2026-03-06 11:52 ` Markus Elfring via OP-TEE
2026-03-06 11:52 ` Markus Elfring
2026-03-12 9:16 ` Sumit Garg via OP-TEE
2026-03-12 9:16 ` Sumit Garg
2026-03-12 11:16 ` Jens Wiklander
2026-03-15 5:02 ` Sumit Garg via OP-TEE [this message]
2026-03-15 5:02 ` Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abY9WIm2z29SvJeG@sumit-xelite \
--to=op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=jens.wiklander@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nichen@iscas.ac.cn \
--cc=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.