All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: "Sean Hefty" <sean.hefty@intel.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH 3/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:37:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada3bjhrw47.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ORSMSX4011XvpFVjCRG00000041@orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (Sean Hefty's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:28:17 -0800")

BTW, it's probably worth highlighting these parts of this patch:

First off, ip_dev_find() is exported again:

 > --- linux-2.6.git/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c	2006-01-16 10:28:29.000000000 -0800
 > +++ linux-2.6.ib/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c	2006-01-16 16:14:24.000000000 -0800
 > @@ -666,4 +666,5 @@ void __init ip_fib_init(void)
 >  }
 >  
 >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_addr_type);
 > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_dev_find);
 >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_rt_ioctl);

And then it's used here:

 > +int rdma_translate_ip(struct sockaddr *addr, struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr)
 > +{
 > +	struct net_device *dev;
 > +	u32 ip = ((struct sockaddr_in *) addr)->sin_addr.s_addr;
 > +	int ret;
 > +
 > +	dev = ip_dev_find(ip);
 > +	if (!dev)
 > +		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 > +
 > +	ret = copy_addr(dev_addr, dev, NULL);
 > +	dev_put(dev);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}

And also here to find the local device to use when connecting to a
loopback address:

 > +static int addr_resolve_local(struct sockaddr_in *src_in,
 > +			      struct sockaddr_in *dst_in,
 > +			      struct rdma_dev_addr *addr)
 > +{
 > +	struct net_device *dev;
 > +	u32 src_ip = src_in->sin_addr.s_addr;
 > +	u32 dst_ip = dst_in->sin_addr.s_addr;
 > +	int ret;
 > +
 > +	dev = ip_dev_find(dst_ip);
 > +	if (!dev)
 > +		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 > +
 > +	if (!src_ip) {
 > +		src_in->sin_family = dst_in->sin_family;
 > +		src_in->sin_addr.s_addr = dst_ip;
 > +		ret = copy_addr(addr, dev, dev->dev_addr);
 > +	} else {
 > +		ret = rdma_translate_ip((struct sockaddr *)src_in, addr);
 > +		if (!ret)
 > +			memcpy(addr->dst_dev_addr, dev->dev_addr, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
 > +	}
 > +
 > +	dev_put(dev);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}

I don't really have an opinion one way or another about this usage,
but I think it's a good idea to make sure that this stuff doesn't get
lost in all the other code, since it is (re)exporting a function that
is currently private to networking.

 - R.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: "Sean Hefty" <sean.hefty@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:37:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada3bjhrw47.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ORSMSX4011XvpFVjCRG00000041@orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (Sean Hefty's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:28:17 -0800")

BTW, it's probably worth highlighting these parts of this patch:

First off, ip_dev_find() is exported again:

 > --- linux-2.6.git/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c	2006-01-16 10:28:29.000000000 -0800
 > +++ linux-2.6.ib/net/ipv4/fib_frontend.c	2006-01-16 16:14:24.000000000 -0800
 > @@ -666,4 +666,5 @@ void __init ip_fib_init(void)
 >  }
 >  
 >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(inet_addr_type);
 > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_dev_find);
 >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_rt_ioctl);

And then it's used here:

 > +int rdma_translate_ip(struct sockaddr *addr, struct rdma_dev_addr *dev_addr)
 > +{
 > +	struct net_device *dev;
 > +	u32 ip = ((struct sockaddr_in *) addr)->sin_addr.s_addr;
 > +	int ret;
 > +
 > +	dev = ip_dev_find(ip);
 > +	if (!dev)
 > +		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 > +
 > +	ret = copy_addr(dev_addr, dev, NULL);
 > +	dev_put(dev);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}

And also here to find the local device to use when connecting to a
loopback address:

 > +static int addr_resolve_local(struct sockaddr_in *src_in,
 > +			      struct sockaddr_in *dst_in,
 > +			      struct rdma_dev_addr *addr)
 > +{
 > +	struct net_device *dev;
 > +	u32 src_ip = src_in->sin_addr.s_addr;
 > +	u32 dst_ip = dst_in->sin_addr.s_addr;
 > +	int ret;
 > +
 > +	dev = ip_dev_find(dst_ip);
 > +	if (!dev)
 > +		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
 > +
 > +	if (!src_ip) {
 > +		src_in->sin_family = dst_in->sin_family;
 > +		src_in->sin_addr.s_addr = dst_ip;
 > +		ret = copy_addr(addr, dev, dev->dev_addr);
 > +	} else {
 > +		ret = rdma_translate_ip((struct sockaddr *)src_in, addr);
 > +		if (!ret)
 > +			memcpy(addr->dst_dev_addr, dev->dev_addr, MAX_ADDR_LEN);
 > +	}
 > +
 > +	dev_put(dev);
 > +	return ret;
 > +}

I don't really have an opinion one way or another about this usage,
but I think it's a good idea to make sure that this stuff doesn't get
lost in all the other code, since it is (re)exporting a function that
is currently private to networking.

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-21 23:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-17 23:16 [PATCH 0/5] [RFC] Infiniband: connection abstraction Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:16 ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:21   ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:38   ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 23:38     ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-01-17 23:51     ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:51       ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-18  7:08     ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-18  7:08       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-01-18 20:27       ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-01-18 20:27         ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2006-01-18  2:03   ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2006-01-18  2:03     ` Grant Grundler
2006-01-18 17:46     ` [openib-general] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-18 17:46       ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-18 18:02       ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler
2006-01-18 18:02         ` Grant Grundler
2006-01-18 18:13         ` [openib-general] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-18 18:13           ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:24 ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:28 ` [PATCH 3/5] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:28   ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-21 23:37   ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2006-01-21 23:37     ` Roland Dreier
2006-01-17 23:37 ` [PATCH 4/5] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:37   ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-17 23:44   ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-18 15:43   ` [openib-general] " Roland Dreier
2006-01-18 15:43     ` Roland Dreier
2006-01-18 15:44   ` [openib-general] " Roland Dreier
2006-01-18 15:44     ` Roland Dreier
2006-01-18 18:19     ` [openib-general] " Sean Hefty
2006-01-18 18:19       ` Sean Hefty
2006-01-18 18:49       ` [openib-general] " Grant Grundler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ada3bjhrw47.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.