All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@de.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	OF-EWG <ewg@lists.openfabrics.org>,
	LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
	OF-General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
	Alexander Schmidt <alexschm@de.ibm.com>,
	Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix suppression of port activation events
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:36:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaod0nqpx4.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811071742.51867.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:42:51 +0100")

 > A previous fix introduced a regression where port activation events were
 > dropped unconditionally if port autodetection was not enabled. Fixed.

Is this a fix to "IB/ehca: Remove reference to special QP in case of
port activation failure"?  Because if so I can roll it into that patch,
since Linus hasn't pulled it yet.

 - R.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Joachim Fenkes <fenkes@de.ibm.com>
Cc: LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	OF-General <general@lists.openfabrics.org>,
	Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>,
	OF-EWG <ewg@lists.openfabrics.org>,
	Stefan Roscher <stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com>,
	Christoph Raisch <raisch@de.ibm.com>,
	"Hoang-Nam Nguyen" <hnguyen@de.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Schmidt <alexschm@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix suppression of port activation events
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:36:23 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaod0nqpx4.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200811071742.51867.fenkes@de.ibm.com> (Joachim Fenkes's message of "Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:42:51 +0100")

 > A previous fix introduced a regression where port activation events were
 > dropped unconditionally if port autodetection was not enabled. Fixed.

Is this a fix to "IB/ehca: Remove reference to special QP in case of
port activation failure"?  Because if so I can roll it into that patch,
since Linus hasn't pulled it yet.

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-10 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-06 16:35 IB/ehca: Reject send WRs only for RESET, INIT and RTR state Joachim Fenkes
2008-06-06 16:35 ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-06-06 18:22 ` Roland Dreier
2008-06-06 18:22   ` Roland Dreier
2008-06-06 20:20 ` [ofa-general] " Dotan Barak
2008-06-06 20:20   ` Dotan Barak
2008-06-09 11:24   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Reject recv WRs if QP is in RESET state Joachim Fenkes
2008-06-09 11:24     ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-06-20 17:26     ` Roland Dreier
2008-06-20 17:26       ` Roland Dreier
2008-07-01 14:14   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Make device table externally visible Joachim Fenkes
2008-07-01 14:14     ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-07-01 17:55     ` Roland Dreier
2008-07-01 17:55       ` Roland Dreier
2008-11-07 16:42   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix suppression of port activation events Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-07 16:42     ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-10 20:36     ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2008-11-10 20:36       ` Roland Dreier
2008-11-11  9:04       ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-11  9:04         ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-21 15:37   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix lockdep failures for shca_list_lock Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-21 15:37     ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-21 16:02     ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-21 16:02       ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-21 16:18       ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix locking " Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-21 16:18         ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-21 18:28         ` Roland Dreier
2008-11-21 18:28           ` Roland Dreier
2008-11-22  3:41       ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix lockdep failures " Michael Ellerman
2008-11-25 12:58   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Change misleading error message Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-25 12:58     ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-25 23:13     ` Roland Dreier
2008-11-25 23:13       ` Roland Dreier
2008-11-26 13:44       ` Joachim Fenkes
2008-11-26 13:44         ` Joachim Fenkes
2009-06-03 14:28   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Remove superfluous bitmasks from QP control block Joachim Fenkes
2009-06-03 14:28     ` Joachim Fenkes
2009-06-03 20:26     ` Roland Dreier
2009-06-03 20:26       ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-01 11:55   ` [PATCH] IB/ehca: Fix CQE flags reporting Joachim Fenkes
2009-09-01 11:55     ` Joachim Fenkes
2009-09-01 19:55     ` Roland Dreier
2009-09-01 19:55       ` Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adaod0nqpx4.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=alexschm@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=ewg@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=fenkes@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=raisch@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=stefan.roscher@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.