From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Akilesh Kailash <akailash@google.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: another way to set large folio by remembering inode number
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:02:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeAK8mFxzgMOepmZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad_HwhzlNPUEKQi6@casper.infradead.org>
On 04/15, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 04:44:04PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Please add the relevant mailing lists when adding new user interfaces.
> > >
> > > And I'm not sure hacks working around the proper large folio
> > > implementation are something that should be merged upstream.
> >
> > Cc'ed linux-api and linux-fsdevel onto the patch thread with a proposal that
> > I'm not sure it's acceptable or not.
>
> You haven't sent a proposal. This is a reply to a reply to a reply of a
> patch. There's no justification for why f2fs is so special that it
> needs this. What the hell is going on? You know this is not the way to
> get code merged into Linux.
I added two ideas in that email. Have you even tried to understand?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Akilesh Kailash <akailash@google.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: another way to set large folio by remembering inode number
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 22:02:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeAK8mFxzgMOepmZ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad_HwhzlNPUEKQi6@casper.infradead.org>
On 04/15, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 04:44:04PM +0000, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 04/14, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Please add the relevant mailing lists when adding new user interfaces.
> > >
> > > And I'm not sure hacks working around the proper large folio
> > > implementation are something that should be merged upstream.
> >
> > Cc'ed linux-api and linux-fsdevel onto the patch thread with a proposal that
> > I'm not sure it's acceptable or not.
>
> You haven't sent a proposal. This is a reply to a reply to a reply of a
> patch. There's no justification for why f2fs is so special that it
> needs this. What the hell is going on? You know this is not the way to
> get code merged into Linux.
I added two ideas in that email. Have you even tried to understand?
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-09 13:45 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: another way to set large folio by remembering inode number Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-10 1:16 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-14 8:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-14 8:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2026-04-15 16:44 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2026-04-15 16:44 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-15 17:15 ` Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-15 17:15 ` [f2fs-dev] " Matthew Wilcox
2026-04-15 22:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2026-04-15 22:02 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-15 23:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-04-15 23:49 ` [f2fs-dev] " Darrick J. Wong via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-16 1:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2026-04-16 1:19 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-15 16:41 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2026-04-15 16:41 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-17 0:58 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-17 16:54 ` Jaegeuk Kim via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-18 1:08 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
2026-04-18 1:11 ` Chao Yu via Linux-f2fs-devel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aeAK8mFxzgMOepmZ@google.com \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=akailash@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.