From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Junhui Liu <junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] clk: correct clk_div_mask() return value for width == 32
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 11:53:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ags19ABMNAgtao-k@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514-dr1v90-cru-v5-1-34f3021aab51@pigmoral.tech>
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 05:27:17PM +0800, Junhui Liu wrote:
> The macro clk_div_mask() currently wraps to zero when width is 32 due to
> 1 << 32 being undefined behavior. This leads to incorrect mask generation
> and prevents correct retrieval of register field values for 32-bit-wide
> dividers.
>
> Although it is unlikely to exhaust all U32_MAX div, some clock IPs may rely
> on a 32-bit val entry in their div_table to match a div, so providing a
> full 32-bit mask is necessary.
>
> Fix this by using the standard GENMASK() macro. This safely resolves the
> undefined behavior on both 32-bit and 64-bit architectures, while also
> benefiting from the built-in compile-time type and bounds checking
> provided by the GENMASK() macro.
>
> Cc: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
> Cc: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junhui Liu <junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech>
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
To: Junhui Liu <junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] clk: correct clk_div_mask() return value for width == 32
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 11:53:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ags19ABMNAgtao-k@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514-dr1v90-cru-v5-1-34f3021aab51@pigmoral.tech>
On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 05:27:17PM +0800, Junhui Liu wrote:
> The macro clk_div_mask() currently wraps to zero when width is 32 due to
> 1 << 32 being undefined behavior. This leads to incorrect mask generation
> and prevents correct retrieval of register field values for 32-bit-wide
> dividers.
>
> Although it is unlikely to exhaust all U32_MAX div, some clock IPs may rely
> on a 32-bit val entry in their div_table to match a div, so providing a
> full 32-bit mask is necessary.
>
> Fix this by using the standard GENMASK() macro. This safely resolves the
> undefined behavior on both 32-bit and 64-bit architectures, while also
> benefiting from the built-in compile-time type and bounds checking
> provided by the GENMASK() macro.
>
> Cc: Troy Mitchell <troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com>
> Cc: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Junhui Liu <junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech>
Reviewed-by: Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-14 9:27 [PATCH v5 0/6] clk/reset: anlogic: add support for DR1V90 SoC Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] clk: correct clk_div_mask() return value for width == 32 Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 18:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 5:58 ` Troy Mitchell
2026-05-18 5:58 ` Troy Mitchell
2026-05-18 15:53 ` Brian Masney [this message]
2026-05-18 15:53 ` Brian Masney
2026-05-14 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] dt-bindings: clock: add Anlogic DR1V90 CRU Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] clk: anlogic: add cru support for Anlogic DR1V90 SoC Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 18:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] reset: anlogic: add support for Anlogic DR1V90 resets Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 19:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] riscv: dts: anlogic: add clocks and CRU for DR1V90 Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 19:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 3:02 ` Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add Anlogic DR1V90 CRU driver entry Junhui Liu
2026-05-14 9:27 ` Junhui Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ags19ABMNAgtao-k@redhat.com \
--to=bmasney@redhat.com \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junhui.liu@pigmoral.tech \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=troy.mitchell@linux.spacemit.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.