* [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42
@ 2026-06-25 6:26 Charlie Jenkins
2026-06-25 6:41 ` Atish Patra
2026-06-25 12:13 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Charlie Jenkins @ 2026-06-25 6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Weiwei Li,
Daniel Henrique Barboza, Liu Zhiwei, Chao Liu, Atish Patra,
qemu-riscv, Charlie Jenkins
When a non-vendor CPU is used, report the archid as 42 which has been
allocated for QEMU in the riscv isa manual [1]. This can help software
check if it is running in QEMU.
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/marchid.md
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
---
This series was original proposed by Palmer Dabbelt [1] with a follow up
by Daniel Henrique Barboza. This patch implement's Daniel's suggestion.
When booting with a non-vendor CPU such as with the qemu arg "-cpu rv64"
marchid will now be reported as 42.
> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu rv64
processor : 0
hart : 0
isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
mmu : sv57
mvendorid : 0x0
marchid : 0x2a
mimpid : 0x0
hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
When booting with a vendor CPU like veyron-v1, the proper marchid will
still appear.
> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu veyron-v1
processor : 0
hart : 0
isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
mmu : sv48
mvendorid : 0x61f
marchid : 0x8000000000010000
mimpid : 0x111
hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131182430.20174-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
---
target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index fa497e5e8a..59d63f82c2 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
#endif
/* RISC-V CPU definitions */
+#define RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID 0
+#define RISCV_CPU_MARCHID 42
+#define RISCV_CPU_MIMPID 0
static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVG, RVB, 0};
@@ -1198,6 +1201,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
}
#endif
+ if (!riscv_cpu_is_vendor(obj)) {
+ RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mvendorid = RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID;
+ RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.marchid = RISCV_CPU_MARCHID;
+ RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mimpid = RISCV_CPU_MIMPID;
+ }
+
accel_cpu_instance_init(CPU(obj));
}
---
base-commit: b83371668192a705b878e909c5ae9c1233cbd5fb
change-id: 20260624-marchid-80d176b873d8
Best regards,
--
- Charlie
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42
2026-06-25 6:26 [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42 Charlie Jenkins
@ 2026-06-25 6:41 ` Atish Patra
2026-06-25 12:13 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Atish Patra @ 2026-06-25 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charlie Jenkins, qemu-devel
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Weiwei Li,
Daniel Henrique Barboza, Liu Zhiwei, Chao Liu, qemu-riscv
On 6/24/26 11:26 PM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> When a non-vendor CPU is used, report the archid as 42 which has been
> allocated for QEMU in the riscv isa manual [1]. This can help software
> check if it is running in QEMU.
>
> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/marchid.md
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
> ---
> This series was original proposed by Palmer Dabbelt [1] with a follow up
> by Daniel Henrique Barboza. This patch implement's Daniel's suggestion.
>
> When booting with a non-vendor CPU such as with the qemu arg "-cpu rv64"
> marchid will now be reported as 42.
>
>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu rv64
> processor : 0
> hart : 0
> isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
> mmu : sv57
> mvendorid : 0x0
> marchid : 0x2a
> mimpid : 0x0
> hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
>
> When booting with a vendor CPU like veyron-v1, the proper marchid will
> still appear.
>
>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu veyron-v1
> processor : 0
> hart : 0
> isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
> mmu : sv48
> mvendorid : 0x61f
> marchid : 0x8000000000010000
> mimpid : 0x111
> hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131182430.20174-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index fa497e5e8a..59d63f82c2 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> #endif
>
> /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
> +#define RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID 0
> +#define RISCV_CPU_MARCHID 42
> +#define RISCV_CPU_MIMPID 0
> static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
> const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
> RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVG, RVB, 0};
> @@ -1198,6 +1201,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> }
> #endif
>
> + if (!riscv_cpu_is_vendor(obj)) {
> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mvendorid = RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID;
> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.marchid = RISCV_CPU_MARCHID;
> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mimpid = RISCV_CPU_MIMPID;
> + }
> +
> accel_cpu_instance_init(CPU(obj));
> }
>
Thanks for sending the patch.
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@linux.dev>
> ---
> base-commit: b83371668192a705b878e909c5ae9c1233cbd5fb
> change-id: 20260624-marchid-80d176b873d8
>
> Best regards,
> --
> - Charlie
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42
2026-06-25 6:26 [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42 Charlie Jenkins
2026-06-25 6:41 ` Atish Patra
@ 2026-06-25 12:13 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-06-25 15:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2026-06-25 12:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Charlie Jenkins, qemu-devel
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Weiwei Li, Liu Zhiwei, Chao Liu,
Atish Patra, qemu-riscv
Hi,
On 6/25/2026 3:26 AM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> When a non-vendor CPU is used, report the archid as 42 which has been
> allocated for QEMU in the riscv isa manual [1]. This can help software
> check if it is running in QEMU.
>
> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/marchid.md
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
> ---
> This series was original proposed by Palmer Dabbelt [1] with a follow up
> by Daniel Henrique Barboza. This patch implement's Daniel's suggestion.
>
> When booting with a non-vendor CPU such as with the qemu arg "-cpu rv64"
> marchid will now be reported as 42.
>
>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu rv64
>
> processor : 0
> hart : 0
> isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
> mmu : sv57
> mvendorid : 0x0
> marchid : 0x2a
> mimpid : 0x0
> hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
>
> When booting with a vendor CPU like veyron-v1, the proper marchid will
> still appear.
>
>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu veyron-v1
>
> processor : 0
> hart : 0
> isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
> mmu : sv48
> mvendorid : 0x61f
> marchid : 0x8000000000010000
> mimpid : 0x111
> hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131182430.20174-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/
Thanks for linking the discussion. I have but a vague memory of it and the link
helped.
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index fa497e5e8a..59d63f82c2 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> #endif
>
> /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
> +#define RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID 0
> +#define RISCV_CPU_MARCHID 42
> +#define RISCV_CPU_MIMPID 0
> static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
> const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
> RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVG, RVB, 0};
> @@ -1198,6 +1201,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> }
> #endif
>
> + if (!riscv_cpu_is_vendor(obj)) {
> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mvendorid = RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID;
> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.marchid = RISCV_CPU_MARCHID;
> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mimpid = RISCV_CPU_MIMPID;
> + }
> +
Two things:
- we have a 'cpu' pointer at the start so you can use cpu->cfg... instead;
- the "cpu_is_vendor" check shouldn't be needed. Whatever is set as default during
cpu_init() must be overwritten by CPUDef settings done in each DEFINE_RISCV_CPU()
macro.
This happens at this point:
env->misa_ext_mask = env->misa_ext = mcc->def->misa_ext;
riscv_cpu_cfg_merge(&cpu->cfg, &mcc->def->cfg); <================
Therefore we can remove the "cpu_is_vendor" check and just assign the default QEMU IDs
as long as we do it before cpu_cfg_merge(e.g. right after "cpu->cfg.max_satp_mode = -1;").
If we do that we'll ensure that all CPUs will carry the RVI archid 42 unless told otherwise
by the CPU definition.
Yes, this will end up changing the IDs for vendor CPUs that don't set their own IDs. This is
fine - if the CPU doesn't bother setting its own ID this means that the CPU is perfectly
fine with whatever default ID QEMU will provide.
Thanks,
Daniel
> accel_cpu_instance_init(CPU(obj));
> }
>
>
> ---
> base-commit: b83371668192a705b878e909c5ae9c1233cbd5fb
> change-id: 20260624-marchid-80d176b873d8
>
> Best regards,
> --
> - Charlie
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42
2026-06-25 12:13 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2026-06-25 15:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-06-25 16:29 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2026-06-25 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza, Charlie Jenkins, qemu-devel
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Weiwei Li, Liu Zhiwei, Chao Liu,
Atish Patra, qemu-riscv
Hi,
On 25/6/26 14:13, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 6/25/2026 3:26 AM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
>> When a non-vendor CPU is used, report the archid as 42 which has been
>> allocated for QEMU in the riscv isa manual [1]. This can help software
>> check if it is running in QEMU.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/marchid.md
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> This series was original proposed by Palmer Dabbelt [1] with a follow up
>> by Daniel Henrique Barboza. This patch implement's Daniel's suggestion.
>>
>> When booting with a non-vendor CPU such as with the qemu arg "-cpu rv64"
>> marchid will now be reported as 42.
>>
>>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu rv64
>>
>> processor : 0
>> hart : 0
>> isa :
>> rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
>> mmu : sv57
>> mvendorid : 0x0
>> marchid : 0x2a
>> mimpid : 0x0
>> hart isa :
>> rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
>>
>> When booting with a vendor CPU like veyron-v1, the proper marchid will
>> still appear.
>>
>>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu veyron-v1
>>
>> processor : 0
>> hart : 0
>> isa :
>> rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
>> mmu : sv48
>> mvendorid : 0x61f
>> marchid : 0x8000000000010000
>> mimpid : 0x111
>> hart isa :
>> rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131182430.20174-1-
>> palmer@rivosinc.com/
>
> Thanks for linking the discussion. I have but a vague memory of it and
> the link
> helped.
>
>
>> ---
>> target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> index fa497e5e8a..59d63f82c2 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
>> #endif
>> /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
>> +#define RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID 0
>> +#define RISCV_CPU_MARCHID 42
Worth adding a comment (possibly linking to the previous URL)
making explicit this is an assigned number and not the answer
for the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything.
>> +#define RISCV_CPU_MIMPID 0
>> static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
>> const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
>> RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVG, RVB, 0};
>> @@ -1198,6 +1201,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>> }
>> #endif
>> + if (!riscv_cpu_is_vendor(obj)) {
>> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mvendorid = RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID;
>> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.marchid = RISCV_CPU_MARCHID;
>> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mimpid = RISCV_CPU_MIMPID;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Two things:
>
> - we have a 'cpu' pointer at the start so you can use cpu->cfg... instead;
Yep, cleaner.
>
> - the "cpu_is_vendor" check shouldn't be needed. Whatever is set as
> default during
> cpu_init() must be overwritten by CPUDef settings done in each
> DEFINE_RISCV_CPU()
> macro.
>
> This happens at this point:
>
>
> env->misa_ext_mask = env->misa_ext = mcc->def->misa_ext;
> riscv_cpu_cfg_merge(&cpu->cfg, &mcc->def->cfg); <================
>
> Therefore we can remove the "cpu_is_vendor" check and just assign the
> default QEMU IDs
> as long as we do it before cpu_cfg_merge(e.g. right after "cpu-
> >cfg.max_satp_mode = -1;").
> If we do that we'll ensure that all CPUs will carry the RVI archid 42
> unless told otherwise
> by the CPU definition.
>
> Yes, this will end up changing the IDs for vendor CPUs that don't set
> their own IDs. This is
> fine - if the CPU doesn't bother setting its own ID this means that the
> CPU is perfectly
> fine with whatever default ID QEMU will provide.
Should we check for unset marchid and warn or even not accept config
with this field unset?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>
>
>> accel_cpu_instance_init(CPU(obj));
>> }
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: b83371668192a705b878e909c5ae9c1233cbd5fb
>> change-id: 20260624-marchid-80d176b873d8
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> - Charlie
>>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42
2026-06-25 15:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2026-06-25 16:29 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-06-26 5:07 ` Charlie Jenkins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Henrique Barboza @ 2026-06-25 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, Charlie Jenkins, qemu-devel
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt, Alistair Francis, Weiwei Li, Liu Zhiwei, Chao Liu,
Atish Patra, qemu-riscv
On 6/25/2026 12:10 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25/6/26 14:13, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 6/25/2026 3:26 AM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
>>> When a non-vendor CPU is used, report the archid as 42 which has been
>>> allocated for QEMU in the riscv isa manual [1]. This can help software
>>> check if it is running in QEMU.
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/marchid.md
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> This series was original proposed by Palmer Dabbelt [1] with a follow up
>>> by Daniel Henrique Barboza. This patch implement's Daniel's suggestion.
>>>
>>> When booting with a non-vendor CPU such as with the qemu arg "-cpu rv64"
>>> marchid will now be reported as 42.
>>>
>>>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu rv64
>>>
>>> processor : 0
>>> hart : 0
>>> isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
>>> mmu : sv57
>>> mvendorid : 0x0
>>> marchid : 0x2a
>>> mimpid : 0x0
>>> hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
>>>
>>> When booting with a vendor CPU like veyron-v1, the proper marchid will
>>> still appear.
>>>
>>>> qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu veyron-v1
>>>
>>> processor : 0
>>> hart : 0
>>> isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
>>> mmu : sv48
>>> mvendorid : 0x61f
>>> marchid : 0x8000000000010000
>>> mimpid : 0x111
>>> hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131182430.20174-1- palmer@rivosinc.com/
>>
>> Thanks for linking the discussion. I have but a vague memory of it and the link
>> helped.
>>
>>
>>> ---
>>> target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>> index fa497e5e8a..59d63f82c2 100644
>>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
>>> #endif
>>> /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
>>> +#define RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID 0
>>> +#define RISCV_CPU_MARCHID 42
>
> Worth adding a comment (possibly linking to the previous URL)
> making explicit this is an assigned number and not the answer
> for the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything.
Don't forget to thank for all the fish!
>
>>> +#define RISCV_CPU_MIMPID 0
>>> static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
>>> const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
>>> RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVG, RVB, 0};
>>> @@ -1198,6 +1201,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>> + if (!riscv_cpu_is_vendor(obj)) {
>>> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mvendorid = RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID;
>>> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.marchid = RISCV_CPU_MARCHID;
>>> + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mimpid = RISCV_CPU_MIMPID;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> Two things:
>>
>> - we have a 'cpu' pointer at the start so you can use cpu->cfg... instead;
>
> Yep, cleaner.
>
>>
>> - the "cpu_is_vendor" check shouldn't be needed. Whatever is set as default during
>> cpu_init() must be overwritten by CPUDef settings done in each DEFINE_RISCV_CPU()
>> macro.
>>
>> This happens at this point:
>>
>>
>> env->misa_ext_mask = env->misa_ext = mcc->def->misa_ext;
>> riscv_cpu_cfg_merge(&cpu->cfg, &mcc->def->cfg); <================
>>
>> Therefore we can remove the "cpu_is_vendor" check and just assign the default QEMU IDs
>> as long as we do it before cpu_cfg_merge(e.g. right after "cpu- >cfg.max_satp_mode = -1;").
>> If we do that we'll ensure that all CPUs will carry the RVI archid 42 unless told otherwise
>> by the CPU definition.
>>
>> Yes, this will end up changing the IDs for vendor CPUs that don't set their own IDs. This is
>> fine - if the CPU doesn't bother setting its own ID this means that the CPU is perfectly
>> fine with whatever default ID QEMU will provide.
>
> Should we check for unset marchid and warn or even not accept config
> with this field unset?
Hmmm maybe we can adopt a new policy where new CPUs must have an explicit
ID set, even if zero, to be clear that the CPU doesn't care about the
field. But I wouldn't bother about existing vendor CPUs that doesn't set
mvendorid TBH ... people will most likely complain about existing CPUs
throwing warnings that they weren't throwing before.
Cheers,
Daniel
>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>> accel_cpu_instance_init(CPU(obj));
>>> }
>>>
>>> ---
>>> base-commit: b83371668192a705b878e909c5ae9c1233cbd5fb
>>> change-id: 20260624-marchid-80d176b873d8
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> --
>>> - Charlie
>>>
>>
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42
2026-06-25 16:29 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
@ 2026-06-26 5:07 ` Charlie Jenkins
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Charlie Jenkins @ 2026-06-26 5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, qemu-devel, Palmer Dabbelt,
Alistair Francis, Weiwei Li, Liu Zhiwei, Chao Liu, Atish Patra,
qemu-riscv
On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 01:29:37PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
>
>
> On 6/25/2026 12:10 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 25/6/26 14:13, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 6/25/2026 3:26 AM, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > > > When a non-vendor CPU is used, report the archid as 42 which has been
> > > > allocated for QEMU in the riscv isa manual [1]. This can help software
> > > > check if it is running in QEMU.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/marchid.md
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > This series was original proposed by Palmer Dabbelt [1] with a follow up
> > > > by Daniel Henrique Barboza. This patch implement's Daniel's suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > When booting with a non-vendor CPU such as with the qemu arg "-cpu rv64"
> > > > marchid will now be reported as 42.
> > > >
> > > > > qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu rv64
> > > >
> > > > processor : 0
> > > > hart : 0
> > > > isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
> > > > mmu : sv57
> > > > mvendorid : 0x0
> > > > marchid : 0x2a
> > > > mimpid : 0x0
> > > > hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicbop_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihintntl_zihintpause_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zawrs_zfa_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_sstc_svadu_svvptc
> > > >
> > > > When booting with a vendor CPU like veyron-v1, the proper marchid will
> > > > still appear.
> > > >
> > > > > qemu-system-riscv64 ... -cpu veyron-v1
> > > >
> > > > processor : 0
> > > > hart : 0
> > > > isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
> > > > mmu : sv48
> > > > mvendorid : 0x61f
> > > > marchid : 0x8000000000010000
> > > > mimpid : 0x111
> > > > hart isa : rv64imafdch_zicbom_zicboz_ziccrse_zicntr_zicsr_zifencei_zihpm_zaamo_zalrsc_zca_zcd_zba_zbb_zbc_zbs_smaia_smstateen_ssaia_sscofpmf_sstc_svinval_svnapot_svpbmt
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240131182430.20174-1- palmer@rivosinc.com/
> > >
> > > Thanks for linking the discussion. I have but a vague memory of it and the link
> > > helped.
> > >
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > target/riscv/cpu.c | 9 +++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > index fa497e5e8a..59d63f82c2 100644
> > > > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@
> > > > #endif
> > > > /* RISC-V CPU definitions */
> > > > +#define RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID 0
> > > > +#define RISCV_CPU_MARCHID 42
> >
> > Worth adding a comment (possibly linking to the previous URL)
> > making explicit this is an assigned number and not the answer
> > for the ultimate question of life, the universe, and everything.
>
> Don't forget to thank for all the fish!
Haha yeah. I'll link the riscv-isa-manual entry for it.
>
> >
> > > > +#define RISCV_CPU_MIMPID 0
> > > > static const char riscv_single_letter_exts[] = "IEMAFDQCBPVH";
> > > > const uint32_t misa_bits[] = {RVI, RVE, RVM, RVA, RVF, RVD, RVV,
> > > > RVC, RVS, RVU, RVH, RVG, RVB, 0};
> > > > @@ -1198,6 +1201,12 @@ static void riscv_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> > > > }
> > > > #endif
> > > > + if (!riscv_cpu_is_vendor(obj)) {
> > > > + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mvendorid = RISCV_CPU_MVENDORID;
> > > > + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.marchid = RISCV_CPU_MARCHID;
> > > > + RISCV_CPU(obj)->cfg.mimpid = RISCV_CPU_MIMPID;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Two things:
> > >
> > > - we have a 'cpu' pointer at the start so you can use cpu->cfg... instead;
> >
> > Yep, cleaner.
> >
> > >
> > > - the "cpu_is_vendor" check shouldn't be needed. Whatever is set as default during
> > > cpu_init() must be overwritten by CPUDef settings done in each DEFINE_RISCV_CPU()
> > > macro.
> > >
> > > This happens at this point:
> > >
> > >
> > > env->misa_ext_mask = env->misa_ext = mcc->def->misa_ext;
> > > riscv_cpu_cfg_merge(&cpu->cfg, &mcc->def->cfg); <================
> > >
> > > Therefore we can remove the "cpu_is_vendor" check and just assign the default QEMU IDs
> > > as long as we do it before cpu_cfg_merge(e.g. right after "cpu- >cfg.max_satp_mode = -1;").
> > > If we do that we'll ensure that all CPUs will carry the RVI archid 42 unless told otherwise
> > > by the CPU definition.
Oh, much better :)
> > >
> > > Yes, this will end up changing the IDs for vendor CPUs that don't set their own IDs. This is
> > > fine - if the CPU doesn't bother setting its own ID this means that the CPU is perfectly
> > > fine with whatever default ID QEMU will provide.> >
> > Should we check for unset marchid and warn or even not accept config
> > with this field unset?
>
> Hmmm maybe we can adopt a new policy where new CPUs must have an explicit
> ID set, even if zero, to be clear that the CPU doesn't care about the
> field. But I wouldn't bother about existing vendor CPUs that doesn't set
> mvendorid TBH ... people will most likely complain about existing CPUs
> throwing warnings that they weren't throwing before.
>
I agree, it probably won't be an issue for any existing vendor CPUs to
fall back to the new value, but it would make sense to expect new ones
to set the values explicitly.
- Charlie
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > >
> > > > accel_cpu_instance_init(CPU(obj));
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > base-commit: b83371668192a705b878e909c5ae9c1233cbd5fb
> > > > change-id: 20260624-marchid-80d176b873d8
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > --
> > > > - Charlie
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-26 5:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-25 6:26 [PATCH] target/riscv: Report QEMU CPU archid as 42 Charlie Jenkins
2026-06-25 6:41 ` Atish Patra
2026-06-25 12:13 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-06-25 15:10 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2026-06-25 16:29 ` Daniel Henrique Barboza
2026-06-26 5:07 ` Charlie Jenkins
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.