Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] workqueue: Show all busy workers in stall diagnostics

[Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>]

On Tue 2026-06-16 05:44:12, Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello Petr,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 02:38:11PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Thu 2026-06-11 07:50:04, Breno Leitao wrote:
> > >
> > > Unfortunately I didn't get the other pr_info(), because of console settings,
> > > but, I can say the following from this issue and previous code:
> > > 
> > > 1) in show_cpu_pool_hog, found_running variable is set to false.
> > > 2) hash_for_each() never found any running task
> > > 3) The following code was trigger and was very helpful:
> > > 
> > >          if (!found_running)
> > >                 trigger_single_cpu_backtrace(cpu);
> > 
> > Great. So, the extra complexity was worth it. Should I clean it and
> > send a proper patch? Or would you like to do so?
> 
> I am happy to do so. I had a chat with tejun yesterday, and I got the
> impression he is OK with this patch as well.

Great!

> > Also I wonder whether it would make sense to revert the commit
> > 8823eaef45da7f ("workqueue: Show all busy workers in stall
> > diagnostics").
> 
> This patch undo that change already. Would you like to see a full revert
> or, are you OK with this patch reverting that behaviour? Maybe with
> a fixes: tag?

I do not mind how exactly it is done. Reworking the behavior is
perfectly fine. And the fixes tag would make sense when it was
not a full revert.

Best Regards,
Petr