Re: getting bitbake-1.8.12 for the org.openembedded.dev branch?

["Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>]

On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:

> On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:01:20 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> >   for consistency, either bitbake should be included in an OE
> > checkout, or it shouldn't.  it shouldn't depend on which branch
> > you're working with.  that way lies confusion.
>
> In which way do you see breakage? bin/bitbake is gone when you
> switch from stable to dev? So you executed the host bitbake (which
> you said was bitbake 1.8.10). What error happened?

  it was temporary breakage since, when i switched to the dev branch,
the invocation of bitbake reverted to the fedora-installed package,
which was 1.8.10, which was rejected as being too old for the dev
branch.  it just took a few seconds to realize what had happened.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

        Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
"Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com:          http://cli.gs/WG6WYX
========================================================================