From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: getting bitbake-1.8.12 for the org.openembedded.dev branch?
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:06:18 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0907271103390.5449@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907270743.12287.holger+oe@freyther.de>
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> On Saturday 25 July 2009 23:43:09 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Holger Hans Peter Freyther wrote:
> > > On Saturday 25 July 2009 15:01:20 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > > > for consistency, either bitbake should be included in an OE
> > > > checkout, or it shouldn't. it shouldn't depend on which
> > > > branch you're working with. that way lies confusion.
> > >
> > > In which way do you see breakage? bin/bitbake is gone when you
> > > switch from stable to dev? So you executed the host bitbake
> > > (which you said was bitbake 1.8.10). What error happened?
> >
> > it was temporary breakage since, when i switched to the dev
> > branch, the invocation of bitbake reverted to the fedora-installed
> > package, which was 1.8.10, which was rejected as being too old for
> > the dev branch. it just took a few seconds to realize what had
> > happened.
>
> Looking at this. First of all the answers were not as friendly as
> they should have been. Second, I think you have a point that there
> is a inconsistency with stable and dev.
>
> Personally I'm not using stable so I have no idea.
>
> Marcin, Koen. Do you switch from dev to stable? How do you do that?
> Do you have two complete build trees for stable/dev?
i wasn't trying to make a big deal of this, only pointing out that
there was some definite confusion in switching from the stable branch
to the dev branch and having bitbake suddenly "stop working." i
understand how it works now, but it's possible others will trip over
that same issue.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
"Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX
========================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-25 12:15 getting bitbake-1.8.12 for the org.openembedded.dev branch? Robert P. J. Day
2009-07-25 12:52 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-07-25 13:01 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-07-25 13:42 ` Graeme Gregory
2009-07-25 14:11 ` Richard Purdie
2009-07-26 10:44 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-07-25 14:51 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-07-25 21:43 ` Robert P. J. Day
2009-07-26 9:05 ` Koen Kooi
2009-07-27 5:43 ` Holger Hans Peter Freyther
2009-07-27 8:44 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
2009-07-27 11:33 ` Koen Kooi
2009-07-27 15:06 ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2009-07-25 19:55 ` Marcin Juszkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0907271103390.5449@localhost \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.