Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/i915/gt/selftests: Use drm_* prints in aggregated gt selftests

[Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>]

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, Sep 03, 2026 at 12:39:10PM +0000, Krzysztof Karas wrote:
> Hi Andi,
> 
> On 2026-08-28 at 18:18:35 +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 10:03:35AM +0000, Krzysztof Karas wrote:
> > > Move away from generic pr prints to device context aware drm
> > > versions.
> > > 
> > > Assisted-by: GitHub-Copilot:claude-opus-5
> > 
> > what a ride!
> > 
> > While reviewing everything I was thinking whether it would make
> > sense to add an i915_err() like xe and gt.
> The idea makes sense, the question is when to introduce this
> macro. I have the v4 pretty much ready to send, apart from a few
> minor issues I have to fix, but I am not against modifying it to
> accomodate i915_* family of prints.
> If we agreed on this, then we'd have this new macro ready when
> we'd be replacing pr_* prints in other parts of the driver.
> 
> I think it would be worth to keep the series in the oven for a
> few more days, especially when it is not that critical of a
> change. What do you think?

yes, i915_* can come later, of course, it's out of the scope of
this series.

Andi