From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Sergii Dmytruk <sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com>
Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca,
david.quigley@intel.com, lukas@wunner.de, ksinyuk@kernel.org,
rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, cedric.xing@intel.com, sameo@meta.com,
drdeeglaze@gmail.com, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
aik@amd.com, jpiotrowski@nvidia.com, qinkun@google.com,
pgonda@google.com, jic23@kernel.org, alistair.francis@wdc.com,
ankita@nvidia.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, kas@kernel.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com, elena.reshetova@intel.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com,
peter.fang@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 15/20] attestation: Prepare provider and instance core
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 09:22:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aurpges1eUwSJUBE@FV6GYCPJ69> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auOVbGYJjIQTN53z@MjU3Nj>
Thu, Oct 29, 2026 at 07:50:20PM +0100, sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 04:50:48PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
[..]
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_mr_props - Immutable MR properties.
>> + * @id: provider-unique MR ID
>> + * @name: MR name
>> + * @algorithms: ordered hash algorithms
>
>Why do these need to be sorted? Is it just to make indexing easier?
They don't. Will lift this limitation.
>
>I see that the number of algorithms is also checked on extending. Does
>it mean that a situation when not all PCR banks are extended at the same
>time is considered an invalid one? That may be a problem at least for
>DRTM which may extend only one bank even if several are active.
Great catch, I missed this usecase. Will allow extension of subset
of banks.
>
>> + * @algorithms_count: number of algorithms
>> + * @has_register_index: whether @register_index is valid
>> + * @register_index: native register index
>> + * @readable: MR can be read
>> + * @extendable: MR can be extended
>
>At least with TPMs, whether a PCR can be extended depends on locality,
>so this isn't necessarily a static property. Is this flag expected to
>always be accurate or it would be OK for a provider to declare an
>extendable MR but then deny doing it?
Okay to declare it and return some appropriate error, like -EPERM. Will
document it.
>
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_mr_props {
>> + unsigned int id;
>> + const char *name;
>> + const enum hash_algo *algorithms;
>> + size_t algorithms_count;
>> + bool has_register_index;
>> + unsigned int register_index;
>> + bool readable;
>> + bool extendable;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_evidence_supported_object - Evidence output description.
>> + * @format: evidence format name
>> + * @max_length: maximum output bytes
>> + * @binds_mrs: evidence validity depends on MR state
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_evidence_supported_object {
>> + const char *format;
>> + size_t max_length;
>> + bool binds_mrs;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_evidence_caps - Immutable evidence capabilities.
>> + * @min_challenge_length: minimum challenge bytes
>> + * @max_challenge_length: maximum challenge bytes
>> + * @max_total_output_length: maximum bytes across all objects
>> + * @objects: supported evidence objects
>> + * @objects_count: number of objects
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_evidence_caps {
>> + size_t min_challenge_length;
>> + size_t max_challenge_length;
>> + size_t max_total_output_length;
>> + const struct attestation_evidence_supported_object *objects;
>> + size_t objects_count;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_evidence_object_request - One resolved output object.
>> + * @supported_object: matching capability entry
>> + * @output: resolved output blob
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_evidence_object_request {
>> + const struct attestation_evidence_supported_object *supported_object;
>> + struct ctlv_blob *output;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_evidence_request - Validated evidence request.
>> + * @challenge: challenge bytes
>> + * @challenge_length: challenge length
>> + * @objects: requested output objects
>> + * @objects_count: number of objects
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_evidence_request {
>> + const u8 *challenge;
>> + size_t challenge_length;
>> + const struct attestation_evidence_object_request *objects;
>> + size_t objects_count;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_evidence_result - Provider evidence result.
>> + * @object_lengths: produced length for every requested object
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_evidence_result {
>> + size_t *object_lengths;
>
>No number of objects? That would make this structure more
>self-contained. Copying `objects` from the request would allow passing
>it around to handle results, but there may not be too much value in
>doing it this way.
Not really needed. This struct is only related got evidence_get cb and
it is always used alongside with struct attestation_evidence_request
which has the count. It would be redundant to have it here too.
>
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct attestation_provider - Immutable provider operations and properties.
>> + * @evidence_get: produce requested evidence
>> + * @mr_read: read one MR
>> + * @mr_extend: extend one MR
>> + * @evidence_caps: evidence capabilities, or NULL
>> + * @mrs: fixed MR properties
>> + * @mrs_count: number of fixed MRs
>> + */
>> +struct attestation_provider {
>> + int (*evidence_get)(struct attestation *att,
>> + const struct attestation_evidence_request *request,
>> + struct attestation_evidence_result *result);
>> + int (*mr_read)(struct attestation *att, unsigned int mr_id,
>> + struct attestation_digest_set *values);
>> + int (*mr_extend)(struct attestation *att, unsigned int mr_id,
>> + const struct attestation_digest_set *values);
>> + const struct attestation_evidence_caps *evidence_caps;
>> + const struct attestation_mr_props *mrs;
>> + size_t mrs_count;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#endif /* _LINUX_ATTESTATION_H */
>> --
>> 2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 195+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-15 14:50 [PATCH RFC 00/20] attestation: Add a common subsystem and TDX support Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 01/20] ctlv: Add the schema language and generator Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 22:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 13:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-27 8:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 02/20] ctlv: Add the UAPI wire format and family API Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 12:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 23:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-20 23:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 13:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 18:55 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-27 8:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-27 14:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-27 14:48 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-27 15:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-27 15:55 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 03/20] ctlv: Add the root family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 12:28 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 14:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 23:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-21 16:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 04/20] Documentation: ctlv: Add userspace ABI Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 14:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 0:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 9:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-23 19:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-29 18:53 ` Sergii Dmytruk
2026-11-03 10:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 05/20] ctlv: Prepare message input handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 0:43 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 8:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 18:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-27 10:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 06/20] ctlv: Prepare blob descriptor validation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 07/20] ctlv: Prepare schema validation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 08/20] ctlv: Prepare message output handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-02 19:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 09/20] ctlv: Prepare VA blob handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 10/20] ctlv: Prepare event queue support Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 1:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 9:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-26 14:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-27 12:38 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-11-02 12:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 11/20] ctlv: Prepare runtime introspection Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-26 14:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 16:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-30 9:40 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-27 10:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 9:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-11-03 1:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-03 9:29 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-11-04 17:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 12/20] ctlv: Add device and operation dispatch Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 1:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-10-22 9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 18:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 12:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-23 14:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-26 13:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-27 13:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 13/20] Documentation: ctlv: Describe how to write a family Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 14:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 14:49 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 16:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 16:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 8:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 19:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 13:01 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 14/20] attestation: Add the base family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-29 10:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-29 18:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-29 19:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 15:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-30 15:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-11-04 17:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 15/20] attestation: Prepare provider and instance core Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-19 23:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 13:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-29 18:50 ` Sergii Dmytruk
2026-11-04 8:22 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 16/20] attestation: Prepare measurement register journal Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 17/20] attestation: Add CTLV operation handling Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 19:11 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-11-04 19:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 18/20] tdx-guest: Expose the native attestation service API Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 14:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-27 10:03 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 19/20] attestation: Add the TDX family specification and generated files Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 14:50 ` [PATCH RFC 20/20] attestation: Add the TDX family implementation Jiri Pirko
2026-10-15 15:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-22 22:07 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-10-23 14:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 19:40 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-10-23 22:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-02 19:02 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-11-03 0:58 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 18:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-23 19:41 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2026-10-16 23:43 ` [PATCH RFC 00/20] attestation: Add a common subsystem and TDX support Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-17 18:16 ` Dionna Glaze
2026-10-17 19:06 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 19:08 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 19:22 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 20:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-17 21:14 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 20:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-17 20:55 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-17 23:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-18 23:53 ` Dionna Glaze
2026-10-19 12:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-19 16:10 ` Dionna Glaze
2026-10-19 22:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 8:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-21 14:12 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-21 14:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 19:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-22 10:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 11:24 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-22 18:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-22 19:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-22 19:40 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 12:26 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 13:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 14:07 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 19:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-22 19:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 19:52 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-22 20:43 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-20 9:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-20 13:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-20 14:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 15:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-20 16:11 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-20 16:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 12:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-21 13:18 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-21 13:50 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-21 13:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 14:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-10-21 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-21 12:48 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-21 13:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-19 12:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-10-19 23:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-20 12:49 ` James Bottomley
2026-10-20 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-22 10:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-22 15:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-22 16:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 8:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-23 11:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-23 14:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 15:28 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-10-23 15:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-23 19:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-11-03 8:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-27 18:43 ` Dave Jiang
2026-10-27 19:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-27 23:09 ` Dave Jiang
2026-10-27 23:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-28 19:16 ` Dave Jiang
2026-10-29 14:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-29 9:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-29 9:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-29 10:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2026-10-29 7:37 ` Nikolay Borisov
2026-10-29 14:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-10-29 18:43 ` Sergii Dmytruk
2026-11-03 10:10 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aurpges1eUwSJUBE@FV6GYCPJ69 \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=ankita@nvidia.com \
--cc=cedric.xing@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.quigley@intel.com \
--cc=drdeeglaze@gmail.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=jpiotrowski@nvidia.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=ksinyuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=peter.fang@intel.com \
--cc=pgonda@google.com \
--cc=qinkun@google.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=sameo@meta.com \
--cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sergii.dmytruk@3mdeb.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.