From: Alejandro Colomar <alx+linux-hardening@kernel.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/19] string: Add strprefix()
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2026 20:00:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avitCbGKfZgrfh3e@devuan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32e7bdb5b8a4a522566b00763ba13974733290dd.camel@perches.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2290 bytes --]
Hi Joe,
> Date: 2026-11-14 10:24:26-0800
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>
> On Sat, 2026-11-14 at 17:59 +0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> > > A negative of this is that it implies the return should
> > > always be tested even though it can be known that the
> > > return is effectively bool.
> >
> > I'm not sure I follow. The attribute is about the arguments, not the
> > return value. Perhaps I don't understand what you mean by "this".
>
> 'this' is the return of the strprefix function itself.
>
> It returns either a const char * or a char * or NULL.
>
> Because it can return NULL, then the return value
> could/should be tested.
Yes, it must be tested, when not used as a boolean.
The usual replacement of
s += str_has_prefix(s, prefix);
would be
s = strprefix(s, prefix) ?: s;
The boolean use remains trivial:
- return strstarts(name, ".init") ||
- strstarts(name, ".ARM.extab.init") ||
- strstarts(name, ".ARM.exidx.init");
+ return strprefix(name, ".init") ||
+ strprefix(name, ".ARM.extab.init") ||
+ strprefix(name, ".ARM.exidx.init");
and
- if (!str_has_prefix(p, "console=") && !strstr(p, " console=")) {
+ if (!strprefix(p, "console=") && !strstr(p, " console=")) {
The non-boolean use would look like this (actual diffs from the patch
set):
- prefix_len = str_has_prefix(name, PDSC_FW_COMPONENT_PREFIX);
- if (prefix_len)
- name += prefix_len;
+ name = strprefix(name, PDSC_FW_COMPONENT_PREFIX) ?: name;
(the old code, actually, didn't need that test, and could have been
simply 'name += str_has_prefix(name, PDSC_FW_COMPONENT_PREFIX);')
and
- len = str_has_prefix(*str, "brl,");
- if (len) {
+ p = strprefix(*str, "brl,");
+ if (p) {
*brl_options = "";
- *str += len;
+ *str = p;
return 0;
}
and
cmp = strstrip(option);
- len = str_has_prefix(cmp, "no");
- if (len)
+ p = strprefix(cmp, "no");
+ if (p) {
neg = 1;
-
- cmp += len;
+ cmp = p;
+ }
Have a lovely night!
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-14 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-14 15:21 [PATCH v6 00/19] Add strprefix() and fix a bug with it Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/19] string: Add streq() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 02/19] string: Add strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:28 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 17:03 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 18:35 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:53 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 16:59 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 18:24 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 19:00 ` Alejandro Colomar [this message]
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 03/19] string: Document corner-case misbehavior in str_has_prefix() for empty prefix Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 04/19] device property: Fix fwnode_name_eq() for empty node names Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 05/19] stddef: Add const_cast() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 06/19] string: Add [C]QChar_of() and QVoid_of() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 07/19] string: Make strprefix() const-qualifier-generic Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 08/19] perf map: Use bool for return type instead of int Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:22 ` [PATCH v6 09/19] string: Make strstarts() a legacy alias for strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 15:51 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 17:52 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 10/19] platform/x86: hp-bioscfg: Rename local variable Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 16:04 ` Joe Perches
2026-11-14 17:08 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 11/19] treewide: s/strstarts/strprefix/g Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 12/19] string: Remove strstarts() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 15:45 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 13/19] s390/test_unwind: Use bool for booleans Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 14/19] treewide: Replace boolean uses of str_has_prefix() by strprefix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 15/19] treewide: Replace some " Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-14 15:47 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:23 ` [PATCH v6 16/19] string: Add strsuffix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 17/19] string: Make strends() a legacy alias for strsuffix() Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 18/19] treewide: s/\<strends\>/strsuffix/g Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-14 15:24 ` [PATCH v6 19/19] string: Remove strends() Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avitCbGKfZgrfh3e@devuan \
--to=alx+linux-hardening@kernel.org \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saravanak@kernel.org \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.