Re: [PATCH mptcp-next v3 1/3] mptcp: propagate RECVERR sockopts to subflows

[Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>]

Hi David,

On 22/04/2026 23:51, David CARLIER wrote:
> On 4/22/26 10:05 AM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>   > You should drop this line, only a single SoB tag is needed.
> 
>   Ack.

(I don't know why there is an indentation in your replies, but I guess
most email readers will not interpret this properly, even lore [1]:
check your messages vs. the other ones)

https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/CA+XhMqw4xRGdJbtX02++9eS8u_bWOzbPimM1Mk_dDNed5SX94w@mail.gmail.com/T/#mf03244a0e5af6ca0fdd80dfb1bff9f2f2d769e0b

https://docs.kernel.org/process/email-clients.html

>   >> +          ret = mptcp_subflow_set_recverr(sk, ssk, rfc4884);
>   >
>   > The above looks a bit overcomplicated?!? It looks like you could
>   > leverage mptcp_setsockopt_all_sf() [...]
> 
>   Will do, rebased on Matt's sockopt_seq_inc() fix.

FYI, I sent my patch there:

https://lore.kernel.org/mptcp/20260424-mptcp-pm-sockopt-set-all-sf-v1-1-38e7023822f8@kernel.org/

I don't think you need to rebase your series on it, except if not having
this patch breaks some tests. If that's the case, feel free to add this
line in the cover-letter:

Based-on:
<20260424-mptcp-pm-sockopt-set-all-sf-v1-1-38e7023822f8@kernel.org>

See this for more details:

  https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/wiki/CI

Cheers,
Matt
-- 
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.